Abstract:Current contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and non‐contrast‐enhanced balanced steady‐state free precession (bSSFP) MRA cause susceptibility artifacts from metallic devices in assessing endovascular visceral‐artery interventions. The aims of this study are to investigate and compare image quality (IQ) and susceptibility artifacts of three‐dimensional (3D) ultrashort echo time (UTE) time‐spatial labeling inversion pulse (Time‐SLIP) with those of 3D bSSFP Time‐SLIP and to assess denoising deep learning reconstruction (dDLR) for the improvement of the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) in 3D UTE with sparse sampling in phantoms and human subjects. This is a prospective type of study. Pulsatile glycerin‐water flow phantom with platinum‐tungsten‐alloy coil, stainless‐steel, nitinol, and cobalt‐alloy stents were used. Ten healthy volunteers (seven males) and three patients (two males) were included in this study. 3D UTE Time‐SLIP and 3D bSSFP Time‐SLIP at 3T were used. The phantom‐based study compared the signal‐intensity ratio of the device levels (SRdevice) and distal segments (SRdistal) to the proximal segments. The volunteer‐based study measured SNR, contrast ratio (CR), and IQ. The patient study evaluated local artifacts from metallic devices. Statistical tests included paired t‐tests, Wilcoxon‐signed rank tests, and Kruskal–Wallis tests. In the phantom‐based study, SRdevice was small with UTE Time‐SLIP, except the stainless‐steel stent. SRdistal was greater (49.1%–90.4%) on bSSFP images than UTE images (−11.1% to 9.6%). Among volunteers, dDLR in UTE images improved SNR (p < 0.05) and IQ (p < 0.05), but CR was unaffected. UTE Time‐SLIP showed inferior SNR and IQ than bSSFP Time‐SLIP in images with and without dDLR (p < 0.05 for each). However, among patients, UTE Time‐SLIP showed reduced metal artifacts compared to bSSFP Time‐SLIP. Irrespective of the lower SNR and IQ of 3D UTE Time‐SLIP than those of 3D bSSFP Time‐SLIP, the former appeared to better depict flow after stenting or coiling. This indicates the potential of 3D UTE Time‐SLIP to provide suitable diagnostic images of target vessels. dDLR improved SNR with reducing artifacts related to radial sampling, while maintaining the contrast. Level of Evidence2. Technical Efficacy Stage2.

Comparison of utility of deep learning reconstruction on 3D MRCPs obtained with three different k-space data acquisitions in patients with IPMN

Parallel Imaging and Convolutional Neural Network Combined Fast MR Image Reconstruction: Applications in Low-Latency Accelerated Real-Time Imaging.

Application of deep learning reconstruction in abdominal magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for image quality improvement and acquisition time reduction

Effects of Deep Learning Reconstruction Technique in High-Resolution Non-contrast Magnetic Resonance Coronary Angiography at a 3-Tesla Machine

Deep learning reconstruction for the evaluation of neuroforaminal stenosis using 1.5T cervical spine MRI: comparison with 3T MRI without deep learning reconstruction

Effect of deep learning-based reconstruction on high-resolution three-dimensional T2-weighted fast asymmetric spin-echo imaging in the preoperative evaluation of cerebellopontine angle tumors

Diagnostic performance of deep learning-based reconstruction algorithm in 3D MR neurography

Usefulness of pituitary high-resolution 3D MRI with deep-learning-based reconstruction for perioperative evaluation of pituitary adenomas

Deep Learning-based Accelerated MR Cholangiopancreatography without Fully-sampled Data

Optimizing High-Resolution MR Angiography: The Synergistic Effects of 3D Wheel Sampling and Deep Learning–Based Reconstruction

Faster acquisition of magnetic resonance imaging sequences of the knee via deep learning reconstruction: A volunteer study

Value of 3-T MR imaging in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm with a concomitant invasive carcinoma

Comparison Between Amide Proton Transfer Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using 3-Dimensional Acquisition and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Characterization of Prostate Cancer: A Preliminary Study

Ultrashort echo time time‐spatial labeling inversion pulse magnetic resonance angiography with denoising deep learning reconstruction for the assessment of abdominal visceral arteries

Magnetic resonance imaging short protocols for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) surveillance: The time has come

Deep Learning Reconstruction for DWIs by EPI and FASE Sequences for Head and Neck Tumors

Comparison of model-based versus deep learning-based image reconstruction for thin-slice T2-weighted spin-echo prostate MRI

Comparison of Parallel Mri Reconstruction Methods for Accelerated 3d Fast Spin-Echo Imaging

Deep learning-based reconstruction of highly accelerated 3D MRI

Applicability of deep learning-based reconstruction trained by brain and knee 3T MRI to lumbar 1.5T MRI

Super-resolution Deep Learning Reconstruction for 3D Brain MR Imaging: Improvement of Cranial Nerve Depiction and Interobserver Agreement in Evaluations of Neurovascular Conflict