Abstract:Purpose In the online environment, consumers increasingly feel vulnerable due to firms' expanding capabilities of collecting and using their data in an unsanctioned manner. Drawing from gossip theory, this research focuses on two key suppressors of consumer vulnerability: transparency and control. Previous studies conceptualize transparency and control from rationalistic approaches that overlook individual experiences and present a unidimensional conceptualization. This research aims to understand how individuals interpret transparency and control concerning privacy vulnerability in the online environment. Additionally, it explores strategic approaches to communicating the value of transparency and control. Design/methodology/approach An interpretivism paradigm and phenomenology were adopted in the research design. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 41 participants, including consumers and experts, and analyzed through thematic analysis. Findings The findings identify key conceptual dimensions of transparency and control by adapting justice theory. They also reveal that firms can communicate assurance, functional, technical and social values of transparency and control to address consumer vulnerability. Originality/value This research makes the following contributions to the data privacy literature. The findings exhibit multidimensional and comprehensive conceptualizations of transparency and control, including user, firm and information perspectives. Additionally, the conceptual framework combines empirical insights from both experiencers and observers to offer an understanding of how transparency and control serve as justice mechanisms to effectively tackle the issue of unsanctioned transmission of personal information and subsequently address vulnerability. Lastly, the findings provide strategic approaches to communicating the value of transparency and control.

When Does Information Transparency Reduce Downside of Personalization? Role of Need for Cognition and Perceived Control

Tracking technologies in eHealth: Revisiting the personalization-privacy paradox through the transparency-control framework

Beyond the Personalization–Privacy Paradox: Privacy Valuation, Transparency Features, and Service Personalization

Losing privacy versus losing choice: How consumers react to different costs of personalization

The Bulletproof Glass Effect: Unintended Consequences of Privacy Notices

Online Anthropomorphism and Consumers’ Privacy Concern: Moderating Roles of Need for Interaction and Social Exclusion

A construal level theory approach to privacy protection: The conjoint impact of benefits and risks of information disclosure

Why Am I Seeing This Ad? The Effect of Ad Transparency on Ad Effectiveness

Personalizing Smart Home Privacy Protection With Individuals' Regulatory Focus: Would You Preserve or Enhance Your Information Privacy?

Antecedents of Consumers’ Privacy Protection Behavior and Intention to Disclose Personal Information: Mediating Role of Personal Information Transparency

The Influence of Transparency in Personalized Recommendation Ads on Consumer Privacy Concerns and Purchase Intentions

Transformative privacy calculus: Conceptualizing the personalization‐privacy paradox on social media

Juxtaposing the persuasion knowledge model and privacy paradox: An experimental look at advertising personalization, public policy and public understanding

The Power and Pitfalls of Transparent Privacy Policies in Social Networking Service Platforms

Consumers' Perceived Privacy Violations in Online Advertising

Regaining Trust: Impact of Transparent User Interface Design on Acceptance of Camera-Based In-Car Health Monitoring Systems

Consumer vulnerability: understanding transparency and control in the online environment

How Much Information?: Effects of Transparency on Trust in an Algorithmic Interface

The Impact of Cloaking Digital Footprints on User Privacy and Personalization

Examining the inconsistent effect of privacy control on privacy concerns in e-commerce services: The moderating role of privacy experience and risk propensity

Online Privacy Heuristics that Predict Information Disclosure