Personalizing Smart Home Privacy Protection With Individuals' Regulatory Focus: Would You Preserve or Enhance Your Information Privacy?

Reza Ghaiumy Anaraky,Yao Li,Hichang Cho,Danny Yuxing Huang,Kaileigh A. Byrne,Bart Knijnenburg,Oded Nov
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642640
2024-02-28
Abstract:In this study, we explore the effectiveness of persuasive messages endorsing the adoption of a privacy protection technology (IoT Inspector) tailored to individuals' regulatory focus (promotion or prevention). We explore if and how regulatory fit (i.e., tuning the goal-pursuit mechanism to individuals' internal regulatory focus) can increase persuasion and adoption. We conducted a between-subject experiment (N = 236) presenting participants with the IoT Inspector in gain ("Privacy Enhancing Technology" -- PET) or loss ("Privacy Preserving Technology" -- PPT) framing. Results show that the effect of regulatory fit on adoption is mediated by trust and privacy calculus processes: prevention-focused users who read the PPT message trust the tool more. Furthermore, privacy calculus favors using the tool when promotion-focused individuals read the PET message. We discuss the contribution of understanding the cognitive mechanisms behind regulatory fit in privacy decision-making to support privacy protection.
Human-Computer Interaction
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper discusses how to improve the adoption rate of privacy protection in smart homes through personalized information, especially focusing on individual regulatory concerns (promotion or prevention). The study demonstrates through experiments that regulatory fit (i.e., adjusting the goal pursuit mechanism to match individual internal regulatory concerns) can increase persuasion and adoption rates. The experimental subjects were divided into two groups, one group receiving information about "Privacy Enhancement Technology" (PET) framework and the other group receiving information about "Privacy Protection Technology" (PPT) framework. The results indicate that regulatory fit influences adoption behavior through trust and the privacy calculus process: users with prevention concerns have higher trust in the tool when they see PPT information, while users with promotion concerns are more inclined to use the tool when they see PET information. The study further discusses the importance of understanding the cognitive mechanisms of regulatory fit in privacy decision-making to support privacy protection. This research has theoretical and practical significance for understanding how to design effective privacy protection strategies based on different user characteristics.