Abstract:The preparation of a financial report is an obligation for an industry both on a small, medium and large scale. Then another obligation is an assessment of the fairness of a financial report, where the assessment is carried out by an external party, namely the Public Accounting Firm (KAP). KAP as an external party or third party is employed by a company and becomes a liaison between the agent and the principal. Therefore, with this situation, there is an agency theory, which will cause agency costs for a company that uses its services. In providing an audit service in financial statements, an auditor who works at KAP needs to provide the best quality for the implementation of the audit carried out. This study presents factors such as audit fees, audit tenure and professional dues that will have an influence on audit quality. This research was conducted by distributing questionnaires to auditors at KAP in Java. Based on the results of research conducted, it is stated that the audit fee variable has no effect on the quality of the audit produced by the auditor, in other words, the audit fee given cannot predict the audit result that will be given. The second hypothesis states that the number of auditor engagements with clients (audit tenure) has a significant negative effect on the quality of the audit produced by the auditor. This means that the longer the audit time between the client and the auditor, for example more than three years, it will have a negative impact on the quality of the resulting audit due to weak independence. The third hypothesis gives the result that Due Professional Care has a significant and positive effect on audit quality, which means that the prudential principle of an auditor in obtaining evidence will provide better audit quality.

The effect of application of standard audit hour on audit quality under external audit law – Evidence from Korea

Perceived Audit Quality, State Ownership, and Stock Price Delay: Evidence from China

Does Audit Partner Workload Compression Affect Audit Quality?

Does Engagement Partners’ Effort Affect Audit Quality? With a Focus on the Effects of Internal Control System

The Effect of Auditing on Promoting Exports: Evidence from Private Firms in Emerging Markets

THE RELATION BETWEEN ENGAGEMENT QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW HOURS AND AUDITOR CHANGES: EVIDENCE FROM SOUTH KOREA

The Effect of Audit Quality on the Level of ESG: Accounting Audit and Sustainability Management

The effects of audit engagement partner ownership on audit engagements: evidence from Korea

The effects of accounting comparability, income smoothing and engagement partners on audit risk

Environmental Responsibility, Social Responsibility, and Governance from the Perspective of Auditors

Time to Revisit Audit Committee Activity: Evidence from Audit Adjustments

Auditor tenure, investor protection and accounting quality: international evidence

The Effect of Reporting Key Audit Matters on Audit Fees and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from Hong Kong

Big N Audit Quality Effect: New Evidence on Audit Hours and Audit Adjustments

Internal Control Managers’ Accounting Experiences on Audit Quality—Focus on ESG

Consequences of the implementation of expanded audit reports with key audit matters (KAMs) on audit quality

Economic policy uncertainty, audit quality, and earnings manipulation

The effect of individual auditor quality on audit outcomes: opening the black box of audit quality

Economic Consequences Of IFRS Adoption In Korea: A Literature Review

PENGARUH FEE AUDIT, AUDIT TENURE DAN DUE PROFESSIONAL CARE TERHADAP KUALITAS HASIL AUDIT

Time budget pressure on audit quality with audit structure, independence, and audit supervision as moderating variable