Identification of Candida auris by Use of the Updated Vitek 2 Yeast Identification System, Version 8.01: a Multilaboratory Evaluation Study

Georges Ambaraghassi,Philippe J Dufresne,Simon F Dufresne,Émilie Vallières,José F Muñoz,Christina A Cuomo,Elizabeth L Berkow,Shawn R Lockhart,Me-Linh Luong,Philippe J. Dufresne,Simon F. Dufresne,José F. Muñoz,Christina A. Cuomo,Elizabeth L. Berkow,Shawn R. Lockhart
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00884-19
2019-11-26
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Abstract:Candida auris is an emerging multidrug-resistant yeast that has been systematically incorrectly identified by phenotypic methods in clinical microbiology laboratories. The Vitek 2 automated identification system (bioMérieux) recently included C. auris in its database (version 8.01). We evaluated the performance of the Vitek 2 YST ID card to identify C. auris and related species. A panel of 44 isolates of Candida species ( C. auris , n = 35; Candida haemulonii , n = 5; Candida duobushaemulonii , n = 4) were tested by three different hospital-based microbiology laboratories. Among 35 isolates of C. auris , Vitek 2 yielded correct identification in an average of 52% of tested samples. Low-discrimination (LD) results with an inability to distinguish between C. auris , C. duobushaemulonii , and Candida famata were obtained in an average of 27% of samples. Incorrect identification results were obtained in an average of 21% of samples, the majority (91%) of which were reported as C. duobushaemulonii and the remaining 9% of which were reported as Candida lusitaniae /C. duobushaemulonii. The proportion of correct identification was not statistically different across different centers ( P = 0.78). Stratification by genetic clades demonstrated that 100% ( n = 8) of the strains of the South American clade were correctly identified compared to 7% ( n = 10) and 0% ( n = 4) from the African and East Asian clades, respectively. None of the non- auris Candida strains ( n = 9) were incorrectly identified as C. auris . Our results show that the Vitek 2 (version 8.01) yeast identification system has a limited ability to correctly identify C. auris . These data suggest that an identification result for C. duobushaemulonii should warrant further testing to rule out C. auris . The overall performance of the Vitek 2 seems to differ according to C. auris genetic clade, with the South American isolates yielding the most accurate results.
microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?