High rates of misidentification of uncommon Candida species causing bloodstream infections using conventional phenotypic methods

Yu-Shan Huang,Fu-Der Wang,Yee-Chun Chen,Yu-Tsung Huang,Min-Han Hsieh,Ing-Moi Hii,Yu-Lin Lee,Mao-Wang Ho,Chun-Eng Liu,Yen-Hsu Chen,Wei-Lun Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2020.11.002
IF: 3.871
2021-05-01
Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background</h3><p>Candidemia caused by uncommon <em>Candida</em> species is increasing and misidentification may compromise optimal antifungal therapy. This multicenter study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of species-level identification of uncommon <em>Candida</em>.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>Uncommon causative species of candidemia identified in routine laboratories using CHROMagar, API-32C and VITEK-2 Yeast ID system were collected from July 2011 to June 2014. These isolates were further identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) system and sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer and 28S rRNA gene. Susceptibility of the isolates was determined.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>Of 85 isolates evaluated, <em>Candida guilliermondii</em> (n = 36) was the most common, followed by <em>Candid sake</em> (n = 7) and <em>Candida famata</em> (n = 4). Using DNA-sequencing analysis as standard, none of <em>C. sake</em> and <em>C. famata</em> was correct, while VITEK MS correctly identified 10 of the 11 isolates. With the exclusion of one unspecified <em>Candida</em> by DNA-sequencing methods, the accuracy of conventional methods and VITEK MS was 64.3% and 86.9%, respectively (p = 0.001). Eight isolates were confirmed to be yeasts other than <em>Candida.</em> Compared with other <em>Candida</em> species, <em>C. guilliermondii</em> showed elevated minimal inhibitory concentration of echinocandins.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3><p>Misidentification of uncommon <em>Candida</em> species was common using the conventional methods, especially for <em>C. sake</em> and <em>C. famata</em>. MALDI-TOF MS assisted by DNA-sequencing methods should be considered.</p>
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?