Abstract:Abstract Purpose We present a systematic review of the literature concerning major aspects of science mapping to serve two primary purposes: First, to demonstrate the use of a science mapping approach to perform the review so that researchers may apply the procedure to the review of a scientific domain of their own interest, and second, to identify major areas of research activities concerning science mapping, intellectual milestones in the development of key specialties, evolutionary stages of major specialties involved, and the dynamics of transitions from one specialty to another. Design/methodology/approach We first introduce a theoretical framework of the evolution of a scientific specialty. Then we demonstrate a generic search strategy that can be used to construct a representative dataset of bibliographic records of a domain of research. Next, progressively synthesized co-citation networks are constructed and visualized to aid visual analytic studies of the domain’s structural and dynamic patterns and trends. Finally, trajectories of citations made by particular types of authors and articles are presented to illustrate the predictive potential of the analytic approach. Findings The evolution of the science mapping research involves the development of a number of interrelated specialties. Four major specialties are discussed in detail in terms of four evolutionary stages: conceptualization, tool construction, application, and codification. Underlying connections between major specialties are also explored. The predictive analysis demonstrates citations trajectories of potentially transformative contributions. Research limitations The systematic review is primarily guided by citation patterns in the dataset retrieved from the literature. The scope of the data is limited by the source of the retrieval, i.e. the Web of Science, and the composite query used. An iterative query refinement is possible if one would like to improve the data quality, although the current approach serves our purpose adequately. More in-depth analyses of each specialty would be more revealing by incorporating additional methods such as citation context analysis and studies of other aspects of scholarly publications. Practical implications The underlying analytic process of science mapping serves many practical needs, notably bibliometric mapping, knowledge domain visualization, and visualization of scientific literature. In order to master such a complex process of science mapping, researchers often need to develop a diverse set of skills and knowledge that may span multiple disciplines. The approach demonstrated in this article provides a generic method for conducting a systematic review. Originality/value Incorporating the evolutionary stages of a specialty into the visual analytic study of a research domain is innovative. It provides a systematic methodology for researchers to achieve a good understanding of how scientific fields evolve, to recognize potentially insightful patterns from visually encoded signs, and to synthesize various information so as to capture the state of the art of the domain.

Mapping as critical qualitative research methodology

Framing Experience: Concept Maps, Mind Maps, and Data Collection in Qualitative Research

Navigating the terrain: a typology of mapping in journalism studies

Mapping as the Congnitive Method of Contemporary Urban Space

Analysing the conceptual evolution of qualitative marketing research through science mapping analysis

What qualitative systems mapping is and what it could be: integrating and visualizing diverse knowledge of complex problems

Mapping spatial cultures: contributions of space syntax to research in the urban history of the nineteenth-century city

The application of the qualitative GIS in space-time research

Concept Mapping as a Learning Tool in Higher Education: A Critical Analysis of Recent Reviews

Mixed Research Design in Cartography: A Combination of Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches

Identifying critical thinking skills used by experts versus novices to construct argument maps in a computer-aided mapping tool

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH METHODS

The Application of Qualitative Research Method in Urban Socio-Spatial Structure Research

A Map Is More Than Just a Graph: Geospatial Educational Research and the Importance of Historical Context

Deep mapping in geography education: learning about a distant place and people in a summer school as a 'committed outlier'

Advancing the methodology of mapping reviews: A scoping review

Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Preparing Researchers to Conduct Interdisciplinary, Multi-method Qualitative Research

SUBJECTIVE MAPPING METHODOLOGIES FOR INCORPORATING SPATIAL VARIATION IN RESEARCH ON SOCIAL CAPITAL AND SENSE OF PLACE

The Map As an Object of Service Design

Qualitative Representation and Reasoning in Cognitive Maps: A Survey from Spatial Cognition Perspective