Prolonged impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-harm hospitalizations in France: A nationwide retrospective observational study

F. JOLLANT,A. ROUSSOT,E. CORRUBLE,JC CHAUVET-GELINIER,B. FALISSARD,Y. MIKAELOFF,C. QUANTIN

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.26

2022-06-14

European Psychiatry

Abstract://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0924933822000268/resource/name/firstPage-S0924933822000268a.jpg

psychiatry

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Association Between COVID-19 and Self-Harm: Nationwide Retrospective Ecological Spatiotemporal Study in Metropolitan France

Maëlle Baillet,Marielle Wathelet,Antoine Lamer,Camille Frévent,Thomas Fovet,Fabien D'Hondt,Charles-Edouard Notredame,Guillaume Vaiva,Michael Génin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/52759

2024-08-29

JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Abstract:Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has not been associated with increases in suicidal behaviour at the national, regional, or county level. However, previous studies were not conducted on a finer scale or adjusted for ecological factors. Objective: Our objective was to assess the fine-scale spatiotemporal association between self-harm and COVID-19 hospitalizations, while considering ecological factors. Methods: Using the French national hospital discharge database, we extracted data on hospitalizations of patients aged over 10 years old for self-harm (from 2019 to 2021) or for COVID-19 (from 2020 to 2021) in metropolitan France. We first calculated monthly standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for COVID-19 between March 2020 and December 2021, using a Besag, York, and Mollié spatiotemporal model. Next, we entered the SIRs into an ecological regression, in order to test the association between hospital admissions for self-harm and those for COVID-19. Lastly, we adjusted for ecological variables with time lags of 0 to 6 months. Results: Compared with a smoothed SIR of ≤1, smoothed SIRs from 1 to 3, from 3 to 4 and greater than 4 for COVID-19 hospital admissions were associated with a subsequent increase in hospital admissions for self-harm, with a time lag of 2 to 4 months, 4 months, and 6 months, respectively. Conclusions: A high SIR for hospital admissions for COVID-19 was a risk factor for hospital admission for self-harm some months after the epidemic peaks. This finding emphasizes the importance of monitoring and seeking to prevent suicide attempts outside the epidemic peak periods.

public, environmental & occupational health
Hospitalization for SARS-CoV-2 and the risk of self-harm readmission: a French nationwide retrospective cohort study

Jean-Christophe Chauvet-Gelinier,Jonathan Cottenet,Fabrice Jollant,Catherine Quantin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s2045796024000568

2024-11-18

Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences

Abstract:Aims The impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection on the risk of self-harming behaviours warrants further investigation. Here, we hypothesized that people with a history of hospitalization for self-harm may be particularly at risk of readmission in case of SARS-CoV-2 hospitalization. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis based on the French national hospitalization database. We identified all patients hospitalized for deliberate self-harm (10th edition of the International Classification of Diseases codes X60–X84) between March 2020 and March 2021. To study the effect of SARS-CoV-2 hospitalization on the risk of readmission for self-harm at 1-year of the inclusion, we performed a multivariable Fine and Gray model considering hospital death as a competing event. Results A total of 61,782 individuals were hospitalized for self-harm. During the 1-year follow-up, 9,403 (15.22%) were readmitted for self-harm. Between inclusion and self-harm readmission or the end of follow-up, 1,214 (1.96% of the study cohort) were hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 (mean age 60 years, 52.9% women) while 60,568 were not (mean age 45 years, 57% women). Multivariate models revealed that the factors independently associated with self-harm readmission were: hospitalization with SARS-CoV-2 (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 3.04 [2.73–3.37]), psychiatric disorders (aHR = 1.61 [1.53–1.69]), self-harm history (aHR = 2.00 [1.88–2.04]), intensive care and age above 80. Conclusions In hospitalized people with a personal history of self-harm, infection with SARS-CoV-2 increased the risk of readmission of self-harm, with an effect that seemed to add to the effect of a history of mental disorders, with an equally significant magnitude. Infection may be a significantly stressful condition that precipitates self-harming acts in vulnerable individuals. Clinicians should pay particular attention to the emergence of suicidal ideation in these patients in the aftermath of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

psychiatry
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Self-Harm Attempts Observed in a Hospital Emergency Department

Elena Fernández-Martínez,Andrea Barros-Martínez,María Cristina Martínez-Fernández,Marta Quiñones-Pérez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12030385

2024-02-03

Health Care

Abstract:Suicide is a significant public health concern, with one million lives lost to it every year. Suicidal ideation and attempts are markers of high risk. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative psychological impact on the population. This study aims to describe and analyze the clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of patients who have received medical attention for self-harm attempts in a hospital emergency department, comparing the period before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. This is a descriptive, retrospective study that collected data from medical records of patients who received care for self-harm attempts in the emergency department. The data included cases from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2022. In total, 529 cases of self-harm attempts were identified, of which 62.8% were female. The number of post-pandemic self-harm attempts significantly increased compared to the period before the pandemic. The most used method for self-harm was medication ingestion. This study revealed that over one-third of the participants had previously attempted suicide. Most self-harm attempts were made by women in the 10–20 or 41–50 age groups, with a history of psychiatric illness and multiple medications. The study results also highlighted an increase in self-harm attempts during the COVID-19 pandemic.

health care sciences & services,health policy & services
Pediatric Hospitalizations and ED Visits Related to Mental Health Conditions and Self-Harm

Zaba Valtuille,Vincent Trebossen,Naim Ouldali,Aurélie Bourmaud,Coralie Gandré,Camille Aupiais,Sandrine Katsahian,Richard Delorme,Hugo Peyre,Florentia Kaguelidou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.41874

2024-10-30

JAMA Network Open

Abstract:This cross-sectional study examines rates of hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits related to mental health and self-harm among children aged 6 to 17 years in France before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

medicine, general & internal
Self-Harm Presentations to Hospital Trauma Centre Emergency Departments during the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Madeleine Gordon,Navitha Jayakumar,Clare Atzema,Daphne Korczak,Sidney Kennedy,Ayal Schaffer,Benjamin Goldstein,Beverley A. Orser,Doreen Yee,Lisa Fiksenbaum,Liz Choi,Andrea Phillips,Amanda McFarlan,Margaret Kreller,Corey Freedman,Brandy Tanenbaum,Dorothy McDowall,Amanda Ceniti,Mark Sinyor

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2024.115892

IF: 11.3

2024-04-08

Psychiatry Research

Abstract:The COVID-19 pandemic raised concerns regarding increased suicide-related behaviours. We compared characteristics and counts of Emergency Department (ED) presentations for self-harm, an important suicide-related outcome, during versus prior to the pandemic's first year. We included patients presenting with self-harm to the ED of two trauma centres in Toronto, Canada. Time series models compared intra-pandemic (March 2020-February 2021) presentation counts to predictions from pre-pandemic data. The self-harm proportion of ED presentations was compared between the intra-pandemic period and preceding three years. A retrospective chart review of eligible patients seen from March 2019-February 2021 compared pre- vs. intra-pandemic patient and injury characteristics. While monthly intra-pandemic self-harm counts were largely within expected ranges, the self-harm proportion of total presentations increased. Being widowed (OR=9.46; 95%CI=1.10-81.08), employment/financial stressors (OR=1.65, 95%CI=1.06-2.58), job loss (OR=3.83; 95%CI=1.36-10.76), and chest-stabbing self-harm (OR=2.50; 95%CI=1.16-5.39) were associated with intra-pandemic presentations. Intra-pandemic self-harm was also associated with Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission (OR=2.18, 95%CI=1.41-3.38). In summary, while the number of self-harm presentations to these trauma centres did not increase during the early pandemic, their proportion was increased. The association of intra-pandemic self-harm with variables indicating medically severe injury, economic stressors, and being widowed may inform future suicide- and self-harm prevention strategies.

psychiatry
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on presentations to health services following self-harm: systematic review

Sarah Steeg,Ann John,David J. Gunnell,Nav Kapur,Dana Dekel,Lena Schmidt,Duleeka Knipe,Ella Arensman,Keith Hawton,Julian P. T. Higgins,Emily Eyles,Catherine Macleod-Hall,Luke A. McGuiness,Roger T. Webb

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2022.79

2022-07-13

The British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract:Background Evidence on the impact of the pandemic on healthcare presentations for self-harm has accumulated rapidly. However, existing reviews do not include studies published beyond 2020. Aims To systematically review evidence on presentations to health services following self-harm during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method A comprehensive search of databases (WHO COVID-19 database; Medline; medRxiv; Scopus; PsyRxiv; SocArXiv; bioRxiv; COVID-19 Open Research Dataset, PubMed) was conducted. Studies published from 1 January 2020 to 7 September 2021 were included. Study quality was assessed with a critical appraisal tool. Results Fifty-one studies were included: 57% (29/51) were rated as 'low' quality, 31% (16/51) as 'moderate' and 12% (6/51) as 'high-moderate'. Most evidence (84%, 43/51) was from high-income countries. A total of 47% (24/51) of studies reported reductions in presentation frequency, including all six rated as high-moderate quality, which reported reductions of 17–56%. Settings treating higher lethality self-harm were overrepresented among studies reporting increased demand. Two of the three higher-quality studies including study observation months from 2021 reported reductions in self-harm presentations. Evidence from 2021 suggests increased numbers of presentations among adolescents, particularly girls. Conclusions Sustained reductions in numbers of self-harm presentations were seen into the first half of 2021, although this evidence is based on a relatively small number of higher-quality studies. Evidence from low- and middle-income countries is lacking. Increased numbers of presentations among adolescents, particularly girls, into 2021 is concerning. Findings may reflect changes in thresholds for help-seeking, use of alternative sources of support and variable effects of the pandemic across groups.
Self-harm and suicide death in the three years following hospitalization for intentional self-harm in adolescents and young adults: A nationwide study

Karine Goueslard,Catherine Quantin,Fabrice Jollant

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2024.115807

IF: 11.3

2024-02-24

Psychiatry Research

Abstract:Self-harm is frequent in youths. This study aimed to assess the risk of self-harm and mortality over a three-year period following self-harm hospitalization. Data were extracted from national databases in France. All patients aged 12 to 24 years and hospitalized for self-harm in 2013–2014 were included and compared to age- and sex-matched individuals with no self-harm hospitalization during this period. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used. Overall, 34,533 individuals were hospitalized for self-harm in 2013–2014 (70.8 % females, 79.6 % self-poisoning), with a peak among females aged 14–16. Comparison with 103,599 matched controls showed significantly higher rates of past self-harm, somatic and psychiatric disorders, and dispensed drugs in youth hospitalized for self-harm. During follow-up, they significantly more often repeated self-harm (20.9 vs. 0.1 %), died from any cause (0.6 vs 0.03 %) and from suicide (0.2 vs 0.01 %), particularly during the first year. The choice of a violent self-harm means at inclusion increased the risk of suicide during follow-up. Psychiatric disorders were a significant risk factor for all outcomes. In conclusion, at least one in five youths will self-harm, and one in two hundred will die in the three years following hospitalization for self-harm. Reinforced follow-up care is necessary in this population.

psychiatry
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdowns on emergency data related to mental health disorders in Nouvelle-Aquitaine, France

Maëva Rosely,Laure Meurice,Sophie Larrieu,Pascal Vilain,Edouard Chatignoux,Cécile Forgeot,Laurent Filleul

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.encep.2023.11.019

2024-02-01

Abstract:This study estimates the association between emergency department (ED) visits for mental health disorders (MHDs) and the health context of the COVID-19 pandemic in the French region of Nouvelle-Aquitaine. This retrospective study took place between 2018 and 2021 using ED data. We defined the main exposure according to five periods: "Pre-pandemic (reference)", "First lockdown", "Second lockdown", "Third lockdown", and "Pandemic out-of-lockdown." We constructed the daily indicators for each MHD-related ED visit based on medical diagnoses. We described and then modeled the daily time series using generalized additive models with a quasi-Poisson regression. The analysis included 5,693,341 ED visits of which MHDs accounted for 4%. We observed a decline in ED use for most indicators, particularly during the first lockdown. Models revealed a statistically significant relative increase in ED visits for almost all MHDs during the first lockdown; for anxiety and child psychiatric disorders during the second lockdown; and only for child psychiatric disorders during the pandemic out-of-lockdown period. The public health crisis and lockdowns associated with the COVID-19 pandemic have been important sources of stress that could partially explain the deterioration of MHD indicators, thus leading to new public health concerns (notably among the youngest age group). Mental health is a major determinant of overall health and should therefore be considered in the management of crises that may require similar responses in the future.

neurosciences,psychiatry
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-harm and suicidal behaviour: update of living systematic review

Ann John,Emily Eyles,Roger T. Webb,Chukwudi Okolie,Lena Schmidt,Ella Arensman,Keith Hawton,Rory C. O'Connor,Nav Kapur,Paul Moran,Siobhan O'Neill,Luke A. McGuinness,Babatunde K. Olorisade,Dana Dekel,Catherine Macleod-Hall,Hung-Yuan Cheng,Julian P.T. Higgins,David Gunnell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.25522.2

2021-06-17

F1000Research

Abstract:Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused considerable morbidity, mortality and disruption to people’s lives around the world. There are concerns that rates of suicide and suicidal behaviour may rise during and in its aftermath. Our living systematic review synthesises findings from emerging literature on incidence and prevalence of suicidal behaviour as well as suicide prevention efforts in relation to COVID-19, with this iteration synthesising relevant evidence up to 19 th October 2020. Method: Automated daily searches feed into a web-based database with screening and data extraction functionalities. Eligibility criteria include incidence/prevalence of suicidal behaviour, exposure-outcome relationships and effects of interventions in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic. Outcomes of interest are suicide, self-harm or attempted suicide and suicidal thoughts. No restrictions are placed on language or study type, except for single-person case reports. We exclude one-off cross-sectional studies without either pre-pandemic measures or comparisons of COVID-19 positive vs. unaffected individuals. Results: Searches identified 6,226 articles. Seventy-eight articles met our inclusion criteria. We identified a further 64 relevant cross-sectional studies that did not meet our revised inclusion criteria. Thirty-four articles were not peer-reviewed (e.g. research letters, pre-prints). All articles were based on observational studies. There was no consistent evidence of a rise in suicide but many studies noted adverse economic effects were evolving. There was evidence of a rise in community distress, fall in hospital presentation for suicidal behaviour and early evidence of an increased frequency of suicidal thoughts in those who had become infected with COVID-19. Conclusions: Research evidence of the impact of COVID-19 on suicidal behaviour is accumulating rapidly. This living review provides a regular synthesis of the most up-to-date research evidence to guide public health and clinical policy to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on suicide risk as the longer term impacts of the pandemic on suicide risk are researched.
The association between COVID-19-related fear and reported self-harm in a national survey of people with a lifetime history of self-harm

Chris Keyworth,Leah Quinlivan,Jess Z Leather,Rory C O'Connor,Christopher J Armitage

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03625-0

IF: 4.144

2022-02-02

BMC Psychiatry

Abstract:Background: Relatively little is known about the characteristics of people living in the community who have previously self-harmed and may benefit from interventions during and after COVID-19. We therefore aimed to: (a) examine the relationship between reported self-harm and COVID-19-related fear, and (b) describe the characteristics of a community sample of people who reported a lifetime history of self-harm. Methods: A cross-sectional national online survey of UK adults who reported a lifetime history of self-harm (n = 1029) was conducted. Data were collected May - June 2020. Main outcomes were self-reported COVID-19-related fear (based on the Fear of COVID-19 scale [FCV-19S]), lifetime history of COVID-19, and lifetime history of self-harm. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression. Chi-square was used to compare characteristics of our sample with available national data. Results: Overall, 75.1, 40.2 and 74.3% of the total sample reported lifetime suicidal ideation, suicidal attempts and non-suicidal self-harm respectively. When adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity, social grade, and exposure to death and suicide, binary logistic regression showed higher levels of perceived symptomatic (or physiological) reactions to COVID-19 were associated with suicidal ideation (OR = 1.22, 95%CI 1.07, 1.39) and suicidal attempts (OR = 3.91, 95%CI 1.18, 12.96) in the past week. Conclusions: Results suggest an urgent need to consider the impact of COVID-19 on people with a lifetime history of self-harm when designing interventions to help support people in reducing suicidal ideation and suicidal attempts. Experiencing symptomatic reactions of fear in particular is associated with self-harm. Helping to support people to develop coping plans in response to threat-related fear is likely to help people at risk of repeat self-harm during public health emergencies.
Emotions and behaviours of child and adolescent psychiatric patients during the COVID-19 pandemic

Claudine Laurent-Levinson,Anne-Sophie Pellen,Hugues Pellerin,Cyril Hanin,Juliette Bouzy,Marie Devernay,Vanessa Milhiet,Xavier Benarous,Angèle Consoli,Jianxin Shi,Douglas F. Levinson,David Cohen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.533

2024-02-16

BJPsych Open

Abstract:Background Previous pandemics have had negative effects on mental health, but there are few data on children and adolescents who were receiving ongoing psychiatric treatment. Aims To study changes in emotions and clinical state, and their predictors, during the COVID-19 pandemic in France. Method We administered (by interview) the baseline Youth Self-Report version of the CoRonavIruS Health Impact Survey v0.3 (CRISIS, French translation) to 123 adolescent patients and the Parent/Caregiver version to evaluate 99 child patients before and during the first ‘lockdown’. For 139 of these patients who received ongoing treatment in our centre, treating physicians retrospectively completed longitudinal global ratings for five time periods, masked to CRISIS ratings. Results The main outcome measure was the sum of eight mood state items, which formed a single factor in each age group. Overall, this score improved for each age group during the first lockdown. Clinician ratings modestly supported this result in patients without intellectual disability or autism spectrum disorder. Improvement of mood states was significantly associated with perceived improvement in family relationships in both age groups. Conclusions Consistent with previous studies of clinical cohorts, our patients had diverse responses during the pandemic. Several factors may have contributed to the finding of improvement in some individuals during the first lockdown, including the degree of family support or conflict, stress reduction owing to isolation, limitations of the outcome measures and/or possible selection bias. Ongoing treatment may have had a protective effect. Clinically, during crises additional support may be needed by families who experience increased conflict or who care for children with intellectual disability.

psychiatry
Psychiatric emergency admissions during and after COVID-19 lockdown: short-term impact and long-term implications on mental health

Julia Ambrosetti,Laura Macheret,Aline Folliet,Alexandre Wullschleger,Andrea Amerio,Andrea Aguglia,Gianluca Serafini,Paco Prada,Stefan Kaiser,Guido Bondolfi,François Sarasin,Alessandra Costanza

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03469-8

IF: 4.144

2021-09-24

BMC Psychiatry

Abstract:Background: The 'lockdown' measures, adopted to restrict population movements in order to help curb the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, contributed to a global mental health crisis. Although several studies have extensively examined the impact of lockdown measures on the psychological well-being of the general population, little is known about long-term implications. This study aimed to identify changes in psychiatric emergency department (ED) admissions between two 8-week periods: during and immediately after lifting the lockdown. Methods: Socio-demographic and clinical information on 1477 psychiatric ED consultations at the University Hospital of Geneva (HUG) were retrospectively analyzed. Results: When grouped according to admission dates, contrary to what we expected, the post-lockdown group presented with more severe clinical conditions (as measured using an urgency degree index) compared to their lockdown counterparts. Notably, after the lockdown had been lifted we observed a statistically significant increase in suicidal behavior and psychomotor agitation and a decrease in behavior disorder diagnoses. Furthermore, more migrants arrived at the HUG ED after the lockdown measures had been lifted. Logistic regression analysis identified diagnoses of suicidal behavior, behavioral disorders, psychomotor agitation, migrant status, involuntary admission, and private resident discharge as predictors of post-lockdown admissions. Conclusions: Collectively, these findings can have implications concerning the prioritization of mental health care facilities and access for patients at risk of psychopathological decompensation in time of confinement policies, but above all, provide a foundation for future studies focusing on the long-term impact of the pandemic and its associated sanitary measures on mental health. Trial registration: Research Ethics Committee of Geneva, Registration number 2020-01510, approval date: 29 June 2020.
Suicidal ideation following self-reported COVID-19-like symptoms or serology-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in France: A propensity score weighted analysis from a cohort study

Camille Davisse-Paturet,Massimiliano Orri,Stéphane Legleye,Aline-Marie Florence,Jean-Baptiste Hazo,Josiane Warszawski,Bruno Falissard,Marie-Claude Geoffroy,Maria Melchior,Alexandra Rouquette,EPICOV study group

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004171

2023-02-14

Abstract:Background: A higher risk of suicidal ideation associated with self-report of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)-like symptoms or COVID-19 infection has been observed in cross-sectional studies, but evidence from longitudinal studies remains limited. The aims of this study were 2-fold: (1) to explore if self-reported COVID-19-like symptoms in 2020 were associated with suicidal ideation in 2021; (2) to explore if the association also existed when using a biological marker of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in 2020. Methods and findings: A total of 52,050 participants from the French EpiCov cohort were included (median follow-up time = 13.7 months). In terms of demographics, 53.84% were women, 60.92% were over 45 years old, 82.01% were born in mainland France from parents born in mainland France, and 59.38% completed high school. COVID-19-like symptoms were defined as participant report of a sudden loss of taste/smell or fever alongside cough, shortness of breath, or chest oppression, between February and November 2020. Symptoms were self-reported at baseline in May 2020 and at the first follow-up in Autumn 2020. Serology-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in 2020 was derived from Spike protein ELISA test screening in dried-blood-spot samples. Samples were collected from October 2020 to March 2021, with 94.4% collected in 2020. Suicidal ideation since December 2020 was self-reported at the second follow-up in Summer 2021. Associations of self-reported COVID-19-like symptoms and serology-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in 2020 with suicidal ideation in 2021 were ascertained using modified Poisson regression models, weighted by inverse probability weights computed from propensity scores. Among the 52,050 participants, 1.68% [1.54% to 1.82%] reported suicidal ideation in 2021, 9.57% [9.24% to 9.90%] had a serology-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in 2020, and 13.23% [12.86% to 13.61%] reported COVID-19-like symptoms in 2020. Self-reported COVID-19-like symptoms in 2020 were associated with higher risks of later suicidal ideation in 2021 (Relative Riskipw [95% CI] = 1.43 [1.20 to 1.69]), while serology-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in 2020 was not (RRipw = 0.89 [0.70 to 1.13]). Limitations of this study include the use of a single question to assess suicidal ideation, the use of self-reported history of mental health disorders, and limited generalizability due to attrition bias. Conclusions: Self-reported COVID-19-like symptoms in 2020, but not serology-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in 2020, were associated with a higher risk of subsequent suicidal ideation in 2021. The exact role of SARS-CoV-2 infection with respect to suicide risk has yet to be clarified. Including mental health resources in COVID-19-related settings could encourage symptomatic individuals to care for their mental health and limit suicidal ideation to emerge or worsen.
Seclusion and mechanical restraint in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic: an increased use in mental health settings

Marie-Hélène Goulet,Christine Cassivi,Catherine Hupé,Francelyne Jean-Baptiste,Alexandre Dumais

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1428599

2024-10-04

Abstract:Purpose: COVID-19 pandemic-related restrictions have significantly changed the environment and the delivery of direct care in all health services, including psychiatric hospitals. The aim of the study is two-fold: 1) to retrospectively assess the incidence of seclusion and mechanical restraint in a Quebec mental health hospital over 4 years; and 2) to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their incidence. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study based on medical records from a Quebec mental health hospital collected (a) from April 2016 to March 2019), (b) from April 2019 to March 2020 (pre-COVID onset), and (c) from April 2020 to March 2021 (post-COVID onset). Descriptive statistics, chi square tests, Mann-Kendall test and Welch's t-test were performed. Results: Following several years during which the use of restrictive measures remained stable, we have noted a significant increase within the first year following the COVID-19 pandemic. This increase can be seen in the use of both seclusion and restraints, which have risen 205% and 170% respectively. Conclusion: There are a multitude of factors associated with the incidence of seclusion and restraint that have the potential to be triggered during emergencies and global crisis situations, impacting in turn the rights of an already vulnerable population.
Impact of the COVID-19 health crisis on psychotropic drug use in children and adolescents in France

Jérémy Couturas,Jérémy Jost,Laurence Schadler,Nicolas Bodeau,Véronique Moysan,Bruno Lescarret,Bertrand Olliac,Benjamin Calvet

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-024-00806-z

2024-09-19

Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health

Abstract:In 2019, the world faced a pandemic brought about by a severe acute respiratory infection caused by SARS-CoV-2 virus. The spread of this virus has profoundly affected societies, particularly in terms of their economic, human and social dimensions, as well as their healthcare systems. Several restrictive measures (reduced social interaction, periodic school closures,...) had to be taken to contain the spread of the virus. These measures have had an impact on the psychological well-being of both adults and children. The aim of this study was to assess the changes in psychotropic drugs prescriptions for children and adolescents living in Limousin, a French region, over the period 2018 to 2021.

pediatrics,psychiatry
Temporal trends in calls for suicide attempts to poison control centers in France during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide study

Fabrice Jollant,Ingrid Blanc-Brisset,Morgane Cellier,Marine Ambar Akkaoui,Viet Chi Tran,Jean-François Hamel,Marie-Aude Piot,Mikail Nourredine,Patrick Nisse,Keith Hawton,Alexis Descatha,Dominique Vodovar,The French Poison Center Control Research Group

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-022-00907-z

2022-08-31

European Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract:Concerns have been raised about early vs. later impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on suicidal behavior. However, data remain sparse to date. We investigated all calls for intentional drug or other toxic ingestions to the eight Poison Control Centers in France between 1st January 2018 and 31st May 2022. Data were extracted from the French National Database of Poisonings. Calls during the study period were analyzed using time trends and time series analyses with SARIMA models (based on the first two years). Breakpoints were determined using Chow test. These analyses were performed together with examination of age groups (≤ 11, 12–24, 25–64, ≥ 65 years) and gender effects when possible. Over the studied period, 66,589 calls for suicide attempts were received. Overall, there was a downward trend from 2018, which slowed down in October 2019 and was followed by an increase from November 2020. Number of calls observed during the COVID period were above what was expected. However, important differences were found according to age and gender. The increase in calls from mid-2020 was particularly observed in young females, while middle-aged adults showed a persisting decrease. An increase in older-aged people was observed from mid-2019 and persisted during the pandemic. The pandemic may therefore have exacerbated a pre-existing fragile situation in adolescents and old-aged people. This study emphasizes the rapidly evolving situation regarding suicidal behaviour during the pandemic, the possibility of age and gender differences in impact, and the value of having access to real-time information to monitor suicidal acts.

public, environmental & occupational health
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on presentations with suicidal behaviour in a tertiary hospital Emergency Centre in the Eastern Cape, South Africa–A cross-sectional analysis

Johnré Retief Els,Clint Hendrikse,Luan Taljaard

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2024.08.005

IF: 1.451

2024-09-21

African Journal of Emergency Medicine

Abstract:Introduction Suicidal behaviour is a public health emergency, causing an estimated one million deaths globally each year. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on suicidal behaviour is not fully understood. This study aimed to describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on presentations with suicidal behaviour at a tertiary hospital in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Method This study was a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of patients with fatal and nonfatal suicidal behaviour who presented to Frere Hospital Emergency Centre in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. The analysis included three study periods: August to October 2019 (pre-COVID-19), August to October 2020 (wave 1), and August to October 2021(wave 3). Results A total of 16 419 patients presented to the Frere Hospital Emergency Centre during the study period, with 6 204 in 2019, 4 909 in 2020, and 5 306 in 2021. These correspond to the research periods from August to October for each successive year. The overall prevalence of suicidal behaviour was 1.6 % but decreased marginally during the pandemic (1.8 % in 2019 vs. 1.4 % in 2021) – contrary to what occurred in high-income countries. The prevalence demonstrated a clinically insignificant stepwise decline as the pandemic progressed and was inversely associated with the number of daily new COVID-19 cases nationally. A significant increase in the emergency centre's total length of stay was however observed during the COVID-19 period (143 vs. 80 min, p < 0.001). The high proportion (66 %) of patients with suicidal behaviour requiring admissions increased further during the COVID-19 study period, placing an additional burden on inpatient disciplines. The proportion of social worker consultations increased significantly during the COVID-19 period (65% vs. 44 %, p <.05). Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic marginally reduced the prevalence of presentations with suicidal behaviour to the Emergency Centre, contrary to what was observed in high-income countries.

emergency medicine
Psychological Impact of Exposure to the COVID-19 Sanitary Crisis on French Healthcare Workers: Risk Factors and Coping Strategies

Alexis Vancappel,Eline Jansen,Nawal Ouhmad,Thomas Desmidt,Bruno Etain,Chantal Bergey,Marguerite d'Ussel,Marie-Odile Krebs,Claire Paquet,Christian Réveillère,Coraline Hingray,Wissam El-Hage

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.701127

IF: 4.7

2021-11-18

Frontiers in Psychiatry

Abstract:Background: COVID-19 sanitary crisis is associated with emotional difficulties such as depression, anxiety and reactional post-traumatic symptoms among healthcare workers. Indeed, healthcare workers were particularly exposed to COVID-19 sanitary crisis. This study aimed to investigate the effects of exposure to COVID-19 sanitary crisis on affective symptoms (anxiety, post-traumatic stress, burnout) among French healthcare workers and the mediating role of cognitive emotion regulation strategies (positive re-evaluation and set in perspective) and coping strategies (active coping, planning, instrumental support, emotional support, emotional expression, positive reappraisal, acceptance, denial, blame, humor, religion, distraction, substance use, behavioral disengagement). Method: This cross-sectional survey-based study collected demographic data and mental health measurements from 1,010 volunteers (838 women) who consented online to participate, from March 24 to June 28, 2020, in France. Participants filled out online questionnaires and visual analogic scales that evaluate affective symptoms related to the COVID-19 sanitary crisis, namely symptoms of post-traumatic stress, burnout, emotion regulation abilities, and coping abilities. Results: The majority (57.8%) of the participants presented post-traumatic symptoms. Depending on the sub-dimensions evaluated, a proportion of participants reported moderate (25.9–31.2%) to severe (17.2–40.7%) burnout symptoms. We found a significant effect of the level of exposure to COVID-19 on affective symptoms. Being a woman, having a lower job position and having less experience were associated with higher level of affective symptoms. Moreover, coping strategies had a mediating effect on the relation between stress and burnout, supporting the coping reserve model. Conclusion: Post-traumatic and burnout symptoms were highly prevalent among French healthcare workers at the beginning of the COVID-19 crisis. Exposure to COVID-19 is a determining factor. We can thus promote both coping training and a good environment to limit the emotional consequences of exposure to COVID-19.

psychiatry
Mental Health Hospitalizations in Canadian Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults Over the COVID-19 Pandemic

Nadia Roumeliotis,Matthew Carwana,Ofélie Trudeau,Katia Charland,Kate Zinszer,Mike Benigeri,Mamadou Diop,Jesse Papenburg,Samina Ali,Maryna Yaskina,Gita Wahi,Baudoin Forgeot d'Arc,Sylvana Côté,Manish Sadarangani,Nicole E Basta,Patricia S Fontela,Soren Gantt,Terry P Klassen,Caroline Quach,Quynh Doan,POPCORN Investigators,Sarah Ahira,Upton Allen,Krista Baerg,Megan Bale-Nick,Ananya Banerjee,Michelle Barton,Darcy Beer,Simon Berthelot,Julie Bettinger,Maala Bhatt,Melanie Buba,Francine Buchanan,Jared Bullard,Brett Burstein,Catherine Burton,Rahul Chanchlani,Michaël Chassé,Karen Choong,Evelyn Constantin,Cora Constantinescu,Carrie Costello,Tammie Dewan,Tanya Di Genova,Olivier Drouin,Karen Dryden-Palmer,Geneviève Du Pont-Thibodeau,Marc-André Dugas,Raven Dumont-Maurice,Guillaume Emeriaud,Jason Emsley,Mark Ferro,Karen Forbes,Isabel Fortier,Jennifer Foster,Jessica Foulds,Stephen Freedman,Gabrielle Freire,Eleni Galanis,Peter Gill,Jocelyn Gravel,Emily Gruenwoldt,Gonzalo Guerra,Astrid Guttman,Betty Jean Hancock,Robyn Harrison,Joanna Holland,Ari Joffe,Fatima Kakkar,April Kam,James D Kellner,Lisa Knisley,Thierry Lacaze-Masmonteil,Saptharishi Lalgudi Ganesan,Marc-André Langlois,Nicole Le Saux,Laurie Lee,Kirk Leifso,Patricia Li,Andrea Linares,Sanjay Mahant,Isabelle Marc,Ahmed Mater,James McNally,Garth Meckler,Shaun Morris,Haifa Mtaweh,Srin Murthy,Fiona Muttalib,Leigh-Anne Newhook,Jessica Nicoll,Nathalie Orr-Gaucher,Joseph Pagano,Anna Pangilinan,Jeffrey Pernica,Naveen Poonai,Elodie Portales-Casamar,Robert Porter,Rupeena Purewal,Paula Robeson,Joan Robinson,Marina Salvadori,Susan Samuel,Shannon Scott,Anupam Sehgal,Archna Shah,Tatiana Sotindjo,Carla Southward,Taylor Stoesz,Robert Strang,Shazeen Suleman,Peter Szatmari,Sepi Taheri,Jennifer Tam,Roseline Thibeault,Karina Top,Krystel Toulouse,Sze-Man Tse,Anupma Wadhwa,Sam Wong,Bruce Wright,Rae Yeung

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.22833

2024-07-01

Abstract:Importance: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in multiple socially restrictive public health measures and reported negative mental health impacts in youths. Few studies have evaluated incidence rates by sex, region, and social determinants across an entire population. Objective: To estimate the incidence of hospitalizations for mental health conditions, stratified by sex, region, and social determinants, in children and adolescents (hereinafter referred to as youths) and young adults comparing the prepandemic and pandemic-prevalent periods. Design, setting, and participants: This Canadian population-based repeated ecological cross-sectional study used health administrative data, extending from April 1, 2016, to March 31, 2023. All youths and young adults from 6 to 20 years of age in each of the Canadian provinces and territories were included. Data were provided by the Canadian Institute for Health Information for all provinces except Quebec; the Institut National d'Excellence en Santé et en Services Sociaux provided aggregate data for Quebec. Exposures: The COVID-19-prevalent period, defined as April 1, 2020, to March 31, 2023. Main outcomes and measures: The main outcome measures were the prepandemic and COVID-19-prevalent incidence rates of hospitalizations for anxiety, mood disorders, eating disorders, schizophrenia or psychosis, personality disorders, substance-related disorders, and self-harm. Secondary measures included hospitalization differences by sex, age group, and deprivation as well as emergency department visits for the same mental health conditions. Results: Among Canadian youths and young adults during the study period, there were 218 101 hospitalizations for mental health conditions (ages 6 to 11 years: 5.8%, 12 to 17 years: 66.9%, and 18 to 20 years: 27.3%; 66.0% female). The rate of mental health hospitalizations decreased from 51.6 to 47.9 per 10 000 person-years between the prepandemic and COVID-19-prevalent years. However, the pandemic was associated with a rise in hospitalizations for anxiety (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.11; 95% CI, 1.08-1.14), personality disorders (IRR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.16-1.25), suicide and self-harm (IRR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.07-1.13), and eating disorders (IRR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.60-1.73) in females and for eating disorders (IRR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.31-1.67) in males. In both sexes, there was a decrease in hospitalizations for mood disorders (IRR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.83-0.86), substance-related disorders (IRR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.81-0.86), and other mental health disorders (IRR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.76-0.79). Conclusions and relevance: This cross-sectional study of Canadian youths and young adults found a rise in anxiety, personality disorders, and suicidality in females and a rise in eating disorders in both sexes in the COVID-19-prevalent period. These results suggest that in future pandemics, policymakers should support youths and young adults who are particularly vulnerable to deterioration in mental health conditions during public health restrictions, including eating disorders, anxiety, and suicidality.
Non-fatal suicide behaviours across phases in the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based study in a Catalan cohort

Víctor Serrano-Gimeno,Alba Diestre,Marina Agustin-Alcain,Maria J Portella,Javier de Diego-Adeliño,Thaïs Tiana,Nora Cheddi,Alejandro Distefano,Guillermo Dominguez,Marina Arias,Victor Cardoner,Dolors Puigdemont,Victor Perez,Narcís Cardoner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(24)00065-8

IF: 77.056

2024-04-17

The Lancet Psychiatry

Abstract:Summary Background The COVID-19 pandemic has been extensively discussed in the context of its effect on mental health. Although global suicide rates have remained stable during the pandemic, the specific effect on non-fatal suicide behaviours during and after the pandemic remains underexplored. This study aims to investigate patterns of non-fatal suicide behaviours before, during, and after the pandemic. Methods In this cohort study, we used data from all hospitals in Catalonia, Spain, collected through the Catalan Suicide Risk Code, which is a specifically designed suicide attempt surveillance protocol, involving a face-to-face, in-depth psychiatric evaluation, after a Catalan resident presents any suicide risk behaviour in any public health-care setting. This evaluation centralises data from suicide registries across the territory. We included non-fatal suicide behaviours, meaning suicidal ideation or attempts that did not result in death, and excluded self-harm behaviours not judged to be linked with suicidal ideation. We considered three periods: the pre-confinement period (Jan 1, 2018, to the enforcement of the lockdown in Spain on March 14, 2020); the confinement period (March 14, 2020, to the end of lockdown on June 21, 2020); and the post-confinement period (June 21, 2020, to Dec 31, 2022). We used Bayesian structural time series models to assess the effect of pandemic phases on non-fatal suicide behaviours, and we ran stratified analyses by sex and age to identify distinct patterns among demographic cohorts. Findings We obtained 26 482 records from Jan 1, 2018, to Dec 31, 2022. The mean age was 37·94 years (SD 18·07), and the sample included 17 584 (66·4%) women and 8898 (33·6%) men. Data on ethnicity were not collected. Temporal trends showed a mild increase in non-fatal suicide behaviours from Jan 1, 2018, to March 13, 2020; a reduction during the confinement period; and a subsequent rise after confinement. Bayesian models suggested a significant causal effect of lockdown easing, resulting in a 50·77% increase in non-fatal suicide behaviours (95% credible interval [CrI] 26·62–76·58; p<0·0001). Stratified analyses indicated that the easing of lockdown resulted in a significant increase in non-fatal suicide behaviours among women (25·92%; 6·71–44·72; p=0·011) and among individuals aged 18 years and younger (72·75%; 38·81–108·11; p<0·0001). Interpretation This study provides a comprehensive examination of non-fatal suicide behaviours in Catalonia, Spain, emphasising the dynamics of different COVID-19 pandemic phases. The initial reduction during strict lockdown aligns with Joiner's Interpersonal Theory of Suicide, whereas the post-confinement rise reflects complex factors, including social isolation and economic challenges. Sex-specific and age-specific analyses underscore distinct vulnerabilities, emphasising the need for targeted preventive strategies. Funding Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental annual budget of G21, Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca of the Generalitat de Catalunya. Translations For the Catalan and Spanish translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

psychiatry

Prolonged impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-harm hospitalizations in France: A nationwide retrospective observational study

Association Between COVID-19 and Self-Harm: Nationwide Retrospective Ecological Spatiotemporal Study in Metropolitan France

Hospitalization for SARS-CoV-2 and the risk of self-harm readmission: a French nationwide retrospective cohort study

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Self-Harm Attempts Observed in a Hospital Emergency Department

Pediatric Hospitalizations and ED Visits Related to Mental Health Conditions and Self-Harm

Self-Harm Presentations to Hospital Trauma Centre Emergency Departments during the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on presentations to health services following self-harm: systematic review

Self-harm and suicide death in the three years following hospitalization for intentional self-harm in adolescents and young adults: A nationwide study

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdowns on emergency data related to mental health disorders in Nouvelle-Aquitaine, France

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-harm and suicidal behaviour: update of living systematic review

The association between COVID-19-related fear and reported self-harm in a national survey of people with a lifetime history of self-harm

Emotions and behaviours of child and adolescent psychiatric patients during the COVID-19 pandemic

Psychiatric emergency admissions during and after COVID-19 lockdown: short-term impact and long-term implications on mental health

Suicidal ideation following self-reported COVID-19-like symptoms or serology-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in France: A propensity score weighted analysis from a cohort study

Seclusion and mechanical restraint in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic: an increased use in mental health settings

Impact of the COVID-19 health crisis on psychotropic drug use in children and adolescents in France

Temporal trends in calls for suicide attempts to poison control centers in France during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide study

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on presentations with suicidal behaviour in a tertiary hospital Emergency Centre in the Eastern Cape, South Africa–A cross-sectional analysis

Psychological Impact of Exposure to the COVID-19 Sanitary Crisis on French Healthcare Workers: Risk Factors and Coping Strategies

Mental Health Hospitalizations in Canadian Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults Over the COVID-19 Pandemic

Non-fatal suicide behaviours across phases in the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based study in a Catalan cohort