Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis: Should the Timelines Be Taken Out of the Definition?

Vincent Cottin,Kevin K. Brown,Kevin R. Flaherty,Athol U. Wells
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202206-1143LE
IF: 24.7
2022-11-16
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Abstract:To the Editor : The new ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT (American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society/Japanese Respiratory Society/Asociacion Latinoamericana del Torax) guideline on pulmonary fibrosis (1) includes an important section proposing a definition and criteria for the diagnosis of progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Multiple definitions of disease progression have been used in clinical studies assessing the efficacy and tolerability of antifibrotic therapy in PPF despite management (2–4) (also known as interstitial lung disease with a progressive fibrotic phenotype [5]). The guideline authors propose the term PPF (first proposed in a review article [6]) and defining criteria that, if widely adopted, will help to standardize research in the field.
respiratory system,critical care medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?