Abstract:Purpose Both the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) and the popular press have routinely criticized firms for the complexity of their financial disclosures. This study aims to investigate how financial analysts respond to the tone complexity of firm disclosures. Design/methodology/approach Using approximately 20,000 earnings conference call transcripts of S&P 1,500 firms between 2005 and 2015, the authors first calculate the abnormal negative tone, the measure of tone complexity; then use such tone measure in econometric models to examine analyst forecast behavior. The authors also test the robustness of the results under different model specifications, tone word lists and alternative tone measure calculations. Findings Consistent with the notion that analysts respond to the information demand from investors and incur more costs and effort to analyze firm disclosure when the tone is more complex, the authors find that higher tone complexity is positively and significantly associated with more analyst following, longer report duration, more forecast revisions, larger forecast error and larger forecast dispersion. In addition, the authors find that tone complexity has a long-term impact on analyst following but has a limited long-term impact on analyst report duration, analyst revision, forecast error and dispersion. Originality/value This study complements existing literature by highlighting the information role of financial analysts and by providing evidence that analysts incorporate the management tone disclosed during conference calls to adjust their forecasting behaviors. The results can be used by policymakers as evidence and support for further improving firm communication from a new dimension of disclosure tone.

Non‐Answers During Conference Calls

How Informative is Question-and-answer Similarity to Financial Analysts? Evidence from Chinese Earnings Communication Conferences

Financial analysts' information discovery: A study of manager-analyst interactions in conference calls

Why Do Analysts Participate in Non-Covered Firms’ Conference Calls?

Relative Emphasis on Non-GAAP Earnings in Conference Calls: Determinants and Market Reaction

Conference Call or Social Media? an Analysis of Information Disclosure Choices in M&A

Tone Complexity and Analyst Forecast Behaviors: Evidence from Earnings Conference Calls

What Do Questions Reveal? Analyst Topic-Specific Skill and Forecast Accuracy

Hyperbole or Reality? Investor Response to Extreme Language in Earnings Conference Calls

Unraveling Managerial Tangents in Firm Disclosure: Concealing Issues or Being Exposed?

Analyst Coverage Decisions: The Role of Corporate Disclosure Choices and the Influence Effects of Peer Analysts’ Disclosure Preferences

Analyst Coverage and Earnings Management

Institutional Investor Attention and Firm Disclosure

Investor Attention and Disclosure Effectiveness

Stock Performance and Intermediation Changes Surrounding Sustained Increases in Disclosure

Investor Reaction to Financial Disclosures Across Topics: An Application of Latent Dirichlet Allocation

Artificial Intelligence Measurement of Disclosure (AIMD)

Discussion of A Measure of Competition Based on 10‐K Filings

The influence of conference calls’ semantic characteristics on the company market performance: Text analysis

Do Analysts Matter for Governance? Evidence from Natural Experiments

Informative or distracting: CSR disclosure of peer firms and analyst forecast accuracy