Abstract:We assess the relative role of cognitive and non-cognitive skills in mediating the relationship between family SES and children’s academic achievement. We decompose the total effect of family background on children’s achievement into: (1) the direct effect of family background, (2) the indirect effect via cognitive skills, and (3) the indirect effect via non-cognitive skills. We analyze the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Kindergarten Cohort (i.e. approx. 8,000 children followed from pre-school to 8th grade), with structural equation modeling. The results confirm previous findings that non-cognitive skills are as important as cognitive skills in predicting children’s achievement. Surprisingly, unlike cognitive skills, family SES does not influence non-cognitive skills. The results suggest that non-cognitive skills, a critical determinant of children’s future attainment, are affected by factors uncorrelated with the commonly understood dimension of vertical social hierarchy. In contrast to cognitive skills, non-cognitive skills may be a more uniquely individual determinant of status attainment. Introduction A vast literature in social science shows that family background plays a key role in affecting children’s outcomes in a predictable fashion: children from advantaged families do better than those from disadvantaged families in almost every domain, i.e., being healthier, more successful academically, and less likely to exhibit deviant behaviors (Case, Lubotsky and Paxson 2002; Bradley and Corwyn 2002; Featherman and Hauser 1978). Cognitive skills are widely cited as a critical causal mechanism through which family background affects attainment outcomes (Duncan et al. 1998; Jencks and Phillips 1998; Guo and Harris 2000). Less is known about the role that “non-cognitive” skills, or non-cognitive traits, play in the intergenerational transmission of status. Whereas several recent studies show that noncognitive traits are predictive of attainment outcomes ((Duckworth and Seligman 2005; Groves 2005; Heckman, Stixrud et al. 2006; Jackson 2006; Cunha and Heckman 2009), little is known about the social origins of non-cogntive traits and whether they mediate the influence of family background. We revive the classic Wisconsin model (Sewell, Haller, and Portes 1969) by positing that an important mechanism of family influence on children is not only through affecting children’s cognitive skills, but also through affecting their “non-cognitive skills,” or non-cognitive traits. We posit that the total effect of family background on children’s achievement outcomes can be decomposed into two components: (1) the direct effect of family background on children' achievement and (2) the indirect effect through its influences on children's non-cognitive traits and cognitive abilities. We employ Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) and school-level fixed effects to analyze longitudinal data on children and families from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Kindergarten Cohort (ECLS-K), which collects detailed information on family background and resources and children’s non-cognitive and cognitive traits starting from preschool to 8-th grade. Theory and Method The classic Wisconsin model was developed by Sewell and his associates (Hauser, Tsai, and Sewell 1983; Sewell, Haller, and Portes 1969; Sewell and Hauser 1975) to identify causal mechanisms that transmit a family’s advantages or disadvantages to the next generation. The key idea is that few individuals benefit directly from parents’ material resources (such as a higher purchasing power for consuming goods associated with a higher income) for their own social status. Instead, it is postulated that the main causal mechanisms are social-psychological, especially in terms of educational and occupational aspirations, in addition to cognitive abilities. In its original form, the Wisconsin model posits that all of the family background effects on later educational and occupational achievements are mediated by psychological mechanisms, leaving no role for the direct effect of family background. While we take the Wisconsin model as a good starting point, we do not take the original position and thus allow for the direct effect of family background. Therefore, the key goal of this study is to decompose the total effect of family background on children’s achievement outcomes into three components: (1) the direct effect of family background on children' achievement, (2) the indirect effect through its influence on cognitive abilities, and (3) the indirect effect through its influence on children's non-cognitive traits. We have multiple measures of children’s non-cognitive trait and therefore, will use SEM to identify the latent constructs that underlie our various measures of non-cognitive traits. Additionally, SEM will be employed to estimate the structural relationship between our observed variables (e.g. SES, cognitive test scores) and latent constructs (i.e. non-cognitive traits). School-level fixed effects are employed within a SEM framework. This approach allows us to eliminate potential biases resulting from both observed and unobserved differences across schools that may also be correlated with attainment outcomes, on one hand, and children’s cognitive and non-cognitive traits, on the other. For illustrative purposes, we present four simplified models in Figure 1. One simplification is to collapse all family background variables (including parenting values and practices) together (as X). In practice, we will break up different components of family background and examine results with different model specifications. In Model (a), we estimate the total (i.e., reduced-form) effects of family background (X). We expect the results to confirm what is well known in the social stratification literature: family background (X) has large influences on children’s academic success (Y). In Model (b), we introduce measures of cognitive abilities (V) as an intervening mechanism and expect some of the total effects of family background to be mediated by this indirect pathway. As a comparison, we also run a parallel model with non-cognitive traits as an intervening mechanism in Model (c). Due to the potential (likely Figure 1: Illustration of Total, Direct and Indirect Effects Y X X: Family Background Y: Achievement Outcomes V: Cognitive Abilities W: Non-cognitive Traits (a) Total Effects of Family Background on Achievement

The influence of SES, cognitive, and non-cognitive abilities on grades: cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence from two Swedish cohorts

The influence of SES, migration background, and non-cognitive abilities on PISA reading and mathematics achievement: evidence from Sweden

Cognitive ability, gender, and well-being in school contexts: longitudinal evidence from Sweden

Interplay of socioeconomic status, cognition, and school performance in the ABCD sample

Regional differences in educational achievement: A replication study of municipality data

Persistent association between family socioeconomic status and primary school performance in Britain over 95 years

Changes in the Impact of Family Education on Student Educational Achievement in Sweden 1988–2014

Children’s Non-Cognitive Skills and the Effects of Family SES on Academic Achievement

Parental socioeconomic status weakly predicts specific cognitive and academic skills beyond general cognitive ability

Trends in mental health problems among Swedish adolescents: Do school-related factors play a role?

Social Determinants and Consequences of Children ’ s Non-Cognitive Skills : An Exploratory Analysis

Family Socioeconomic Status and Adolescents’ Academic Achievement: The Moderating Roles of Subjective Social Mobility and Attention

The Importance of Parental Ability for Cognitive Ability and Student Achievement: Implications for Social Stratification Theory and Practice

Health and health behaviours in adolescence as predictors of education and socioeconomic status in adulthood – a longitudinal study

Self-rated health, subjective social status in school and socioeconomic status in adolescents: a cross-sectional study

Cognitive Ability at Kindergarten Entry and Socioeconomic Status

The Long-Term Effects of Student Absence: Evidence from Sweden

Inequalities in educational outcomes in individuals with childhood experience of out-of-home care: What are driving the differences?

Cognitive and brain development is independently influenced by socioeconomic status and polygenic scores for educational attainment

The persistent effect of socioeconomic status on education and labor market outcomes

Students' Choice of Post-Compulsory Science: In search of schools that compensate for the socio-economic background of their students