Abstract:Experimental studies on polysemy have come to contradictory conclusions on whether words with multiple senses are stored as separate or shared mental representations. The present study examined the semantic relatedness and semantic similarity of literal and non-literal (metonymic and metaphorical) senses of three word classes: nouns, verbs, and adjectives. Two methods were used: a psycholinguistic experiment and a distributional analysis of corpus data. In the experiment, participants were presented with 6-12 short phrases containing a polysemous word in literal, metonymic, or metaphorical senses and were asked to classify them so that phrases with the same perceived sense were grouped together. To investigate the impact of professional background on their decisions, participants were controlled for linguistic vs. non-linguistic education. For nouns and verbs, all participants preferred to group together phrases with literal and metonymic senses, but not any other pairs of senses. For adjectives, two pairs of senses were often grouped together: literal with metonymic, and metonymic with metaphorical. Participants with a linguistic background were more accurate than participants with non-linguistic backgrounds, although both groups shared principal patterns of sense classification. For the distributional analysis of corpus data, we used a semantic vector approach to quantify the similarity of phrases with literal, metonymic, and metaphorical senses in the corpora. We found that phrases with literal and metonymic senses had the highest degree of similarity for the three word classes, and that metonymic and metaphorical senses of adjectives had the highest degree of similarity among all word classes. These findings are in line with the experimental results. Overall, the results suggest that the mental representation of a polysemous word depends on its word class. In nouns and verbs, literal and metonymic senses are stored together, while metaphorical senses are stored separately; in adjectives, metonymic senses significantly overlap with both literal and metaphorical senses.

Does polysemy support radical contextualism? On the relation between minimalism, contextualism and polysemy

Semantic minimalism and the continuous nature of polysemy

Can minimalism about truth embrace polysemy?

Disputes over the Mental Representation of Polysemous Senses——Diversified Views, Theoretical Backgrounds, and Empirical Supports

On Semantic Paradoxes from the Perspective of Substructural Logics

Relevance Theory, Semantic Content and Pragmatic Enrichment

Compositionality and the Prospect of a Pluralistic Semantic Theory

Shades of meaning: Uncovering the geometry of ambiguous word representations through contextualised language models

Unarticulated Constituents:Myth or Reality?

Partial Semantics of Argumentation: Basic Properties and Empirical

Copredication and Complexity Revisited: A Reply to Löhr and Michel

Compositionality and Contextuality: The Symbolic and Statistical Theories of Meaning

Compositionality in Context

It Means More if It Sounds Good: Yet Another Hypothesis Concerning the Evolution of Polysemous Words

The pragmatic view on dual character concepts and expressions

The Mental Representation of Polysemy across Word Classes

Lexico-semantics obscures lexical syntax

Polysemy as a Way to Create Nonlinear Text in the Chinese Language Culture

PolyLM: Learning about Polysemy through Language Modeling

From Form(s) to Meaning: Probing the Semantic Depths of Language Models Using Multisense Consistency

The Enlightenment of Polysemous Vocabulary Teaching from the Perspective of Cognitive Linguistics