Abstract:Purpose This paper aims to verify whether the legitimate pressure of external forces on heavily polluting firms' corporate social responsibility (CSR)-related behaviors affect firms' assurance strategy in the Chinese context. The authors argue that, under external pressure, as a source of legitimacy, the assurance over CSR reports allows the business behaviors of heavy polluters to be recognized by society. Design/methodology/approach This paper sampled listed heavy polluters in China from 2011 to 2018 and used the multiperiod logit model to examine the effects of external corporate governance on firms' assurance decisions. Principal component analysis methods were used to construct a comprehensive framework of external corporate governance. The indicators were obtained from the China Stock Market and Accounting Research databases, the NERI Report and the China Urban Statistical Yearbook. Findings This paper confirms that external corporate governance positively affects firms' assurance decisions, and good financial conditions, well-governed internal controls and sufficient government subsidies positively moderate this effect. Practical implications The findings provide feasible ways to encourage firms' high-quality corporate environmental information disclosure, thus providing valuable guidance for policymakers and other stakeholders to effectively supervise firms' CSR behaviors. Social implications The findings are of great importance in encouraging high-quality corporate environmental information disclosures, improving the support of capital markets among developing countries and drawing social attention to the environmental protection and social responsibility of heavy polluters. Originality/value The research extends the current research in the field of social environmental accounting by using legitimacy theory to explain firms' assurance motivations. Additionally, this paper focuses on the practices of assurance services in the emerging economy and provides suggestions for developing assurance over CSR reports.

Does accountability audit of natural resource promote corporate environmental performance? An external supervision perspective

Can China's leading officials' accountability audit of natural resources policy promote corporate emissions reduction?

Government Environmental Regulation and Corporate ESG Performance: Evidence from Natural Resource Accountability Audits in China

Does Accountability Audit of Natural resources promote green innovation in heavily polluting enterprises? Evidence from China

Do Big Auditors Always Perform Better?——Evidence from China's rights issuers and non-issuers

Evaluating the effect of the accountability audit of natural resources on carbon emissions reduction in China

Auditing the environmental accountability of local officials and the corporate green response: evidence from China

Can the Leading Officials’ Accountability Audit of Natural Resources policy stimulate Chinese heavy-polluting enterprises’ green behavior?

Does environmental law enforcement supervision improve corporate carbon reduction performance? Evidence from environmental protection interview

Natural resources and assets accountability audit of local officials and government subsidies: evidence from China

External corporate governance and assurance of corporate social responsibility reports: evidence from China

The effect of environmental credit rating on audit fees: A quasi-natural experiment from China

Environmental governance and firm's environmental investment: Evidence from the natural resources and assets accountability audit of outgoing officials

Auditing leading officials: Unintended consequences of government audit reform on corporate green innovation

The carbon emission reduction effect of auditing outgoing officials' natural resource asset management--Evidence from China

Sustainability Through Scrutiny: Enhancing Transparency in Chinese Corporations via Environmental Audits

Promoting or Inhibiting? The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Corporate Financial Performance—An Empirical Analysis Based on China

The effect of environmental regulations on innovation in heavy-polluting and resource-based enterprises: Quasi-natural experimental evidence from China

Does ecological accountability restrain the financialization of heavily polluting enterprises? Evidence from China

The impact of campaign-style enforcement on corporate environmental Action : Evidence from China's central environmental protection inspection

The accountability system for operation and investment and audit quality of state-owned enterprises