Abstract:Purpose: Spring‐assisted surgery is an effective and minimally invasive treatment for sagittal craniosynostosis (CSO). The principal barrier to the advancement of spring‐assisted surgery is the patient‐specific spring selection. The selection of spring force depends on the suture involved, subtypes of sagittal CSO, and age of the infant, among other factors. Clinically, physicians manually judge the subtype of sagittal CSO patients based on their CT image data, which may cause bias from different clinicians. An objective system would be helpful to stratify the sagittal CSO patients and make spring choice less subjective. Methods: The authors developed a novel informatics system to automatically segment and characterize sutures and classify sagittal CSO. The proposed system is composed of three phases: preprocessing, sutures segmentation, and classification. First, the three‐dimensional (3D) skull was extracted from the CT images and aligned with the symmetry of the cranial vault. Second, a “hemispherical projection” algorithm was developed to transform 3D surface of the skull to a polar two‐dimensional plane. Through the transformation, an “effective” projected region can be obtained to enable easy segmentation of sutures. Then, the different types of sutures, such as coronal sutures, lambdoid sutures, sagittal suture, and metopic suture, obtained from the segmented sutures were further identified by a dual‐projection technique of the midline of the sutures. Finally, 108 quantified features of sutures were extracted and selected by a proposed multiclass feature scoring system. The sagittal CSO patients were classified into four subtypes: anterior, central, posterior, and complex with the support vector machine approach. Fivefold cross validation (CV) was employed to evaluate the capability of selected features in discriminating the four subtypes in 33 sagittal CSO patients. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used to assess the robustness of the developed system. Results: The segmentation results of the proposed method were clinically acceptable for the qualitative evaluation. For the quantitative evaluation, the fivefold CV accuracy of the classification for the four subtypes was 72.7%. This classification system was reliable with the area under curve (in ROC analysis) being greater than 0.8 for four two‐class problems. Conclusions: The proposed hemispherical projection algorithm based on backtracking search can successfully segment sutures of the cranial vault. The classification system can also offer a desirable performance. As a result, the proposed segmentation and classification system is expected to bring insights into clinic research and the selection of the spring force to facilitate widespread application of this minimally invasive treatment.

Cranial Suture Measurement by 2-point Method in Ultrasound Screening of Craniosynostosis

Cranial sutures ultrasonography as a valid diagnostic tool in isolated craniosynostoses: a pilot study

Postnatal diagnosis of single-suture craniosynostosis with cranial ultrasound: a systematic review

High-frequency ultrasound confirmation of positional plagiocephaly

S16-01 session 16: planning/imaging – part ii quantification of head shape from 3d photography for automatic detection of craniosynostosis

Intraoperative Ultrasound in Endoscopic Sagittal Suture Synostosis to Optimize Incision Planning and Avoid Misdiagnosis

Digital Analysis of Cranial Sutures Computed Tomography Data in Adolescents

Premature Fusion Of The Sagittal Suture As An Incidental Radiographic Finding In Young Children

Radiation-free Quantification of Head Malformations in Craniosynostosis Patients from 3D Photography.

Quantitative Evaluation of Local Head Malformations from 3 Dimensional Photography: Application to Craniosynostosis.

Quantitative morphological analysis framework of infant cranial sutures and fontanelles based on CT images

Convolutional neural network-based classification of craniosynostosis and suture lines from multi-view cranial X-rays

Introducing a new method for classifying skull shape abnormalities related to craniosynostosis

Geometric Morphometric Study on Distinguishing Metopic Craniosynostosis from Metopic Ridging

CNN-Based Classification of Craniosynostosis Using 2D Distance Maps

Quantitative evaluation of facial hypoplasia and airway obstruction in infants with syndromic craniosynostosis: relationship with skull base and splanchnocranium sutural pattern

Quantification of Head Shape from Three-Dimensional Photography for Presurgical and Postsurgical Evaluation of Craniosynostosis

Craniosynostosis Assessment Using Curvature Distribution Modes

Evaluation of ultra‐low‐dose CT with tin filter for craniosynostosis

Objective Classification System for Sagittal Craniosynostosis Based on Suture Segmentation

MR Cranial Bone Imaging: Evaluation of Both Motion-Corrected and Automated Deep Learning Pseudo-CT Estimated MR Images