MR Cranial Bone Imaging: Evaluation of Both Motion-Corrected and Automated Deep Learning Pseudo-CT Estimated MR Images

Andrew D Linkugel,Tongyao Wang,Parna Eshraghi Boroojeni,Cihat Eldeniz,Yasheng Chen,Gary B Skolnick,Paul K Commean,Corinne M Merrill,Jennifer M Strahle,Manu S Goyal,Hongyu An,Kamlesh B Patel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8335
2024-09-09
Abstract:Background and purpose: CT imaging exposes patients to ionizing radiation. MR imaging is radiation free but previously has not been able to produce diagnostic-quality images of bone on a timeline suitable for clinical use. We developed automated motion correction and use deep learning to generate pseudo-CT images from MR images. We aim to evaluate whether motion-corrected pseudo-CT produces cranial images that have potential to be acceptable for clinical use. Materials and methods: Patients younger than age 18 who underwent CT imaging of the head for either trauma or evaluation of cranial suture patency were recruited. Subjects underwent a 5-minute golden-angle stack-of-stars radial volumetric interpolated breath-hold MR image. Motion correction was applied to the MR imaging followed by a deep learning-based method to generate pseudo-CT images. CT and pseudo-CT images were evaluated and, based on indication for imaging, either presence of skull fracture or cranial suture patency was first recorded while viewing the MR imaging-based pseudo-CT and then recorded while viewing the clinical CT. Results: A total of 12 patients underwent CT and MR imaging to evaluate suture patency, and 60 patients underwent CT and MR imaging for evaluation of head trauma. For cranial suture patency, pseudo-CT had 100% specificity and 100% sensitivity for the identification of suture closure. For identification of skull fractures, pseudo-CT had 100% specificity and 90% sensitivity. Conclusions: Our early results show that automated motion-corrected and deep learning-generated pseudo-CT images of the pediatric skull have potential for clinical use and offer a high level of diagnostic accuracy when compared with standard CT scans.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?