Age of the Vostok Hydrothermal Uranium Deposit (North Kazakhstan Ore Province) According to U–Pb (ID-TIMS), Pb–Pb, Xen–Xes, K–Ar and Rb–Sr Methods

V. N. Golubev,I. V. Chernyshev
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075701522010020
2022-03-30
Geology of Ore Deposits
Abstract:The duration of hydrothermal mineralization processes is one of the most important genetic parameters. The modern appearance of deposits is determined not only by the ore deposition processes, but also by the subsequent alteration of ores. A particular place in the geological history of deposits is occupied by the processes involved in the preliminary concentration of ore components. An isotope–geochronological study of the hydrothermal minerals of the Vostok field—the largest of the molybdenum–uranium deposits in Central Asia and Kazakhstan—using the U–Pb (ID-TIMS) method revealed that the U–Pb isotope systems of its uranium ores clearly captured an event that took place 267 ± 7 Ma ago. The obtained dating is consistent with the results of isotope dating of pitchblende, near-ore metasomatites, and postore quartz–carbonate veins obtained by the Xe n –Xe s , K–Ar, and Rb–Sr methods. This event is associated with the formation of postore quartz–carbonate veins, the extraction of radiogenic lead from primary uranium ores (accumulations), and its redeposition in sulphides of different ages. As a result of this event, the primary uranium ores of the Vostok deposit have lost their U–Pb geochronometric markers. Information on the age of primary ores has been preserved in the form of "frozen" isotope ratios, 206 Pb/ 204 Pb and 207 Pb/ 204 Pb, in redeposited galena. The data from studying the isotope composition of lead from redeposited galena show that the formation of primary uranium ores that served as the source of this lead (or the initial stage of uranium ore formation) occured 413 ± 7 Ma. The estimate of the formation time of primary ores of the Vostok deposit is quite consistent with the lower age limit of this process, which follows from the recently obtained (Golubev et al., 2020) U–Pb and Rb–Sr datings of ore-hosting volcanic rocks and granite porphyries (434–424 Ma) in the Balkashino ore field.
mineralogy,geology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?