Ore-Forming Material Sources for Xiangshan Uranium Ore-Field in Jiangxi Province: Evidence from Nd-Sr-Pb Isotopes

Hong-hai FAN,Hong-fei LING,De-zi WANG,Wei-zhou SHEN,Chang-shi LIU,Yao-hui JIANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2001.02.002
2001-01-01
Abstract:The Xiangshan volcanic rock related uranium ore-field is the largest uranium ore-field in China. The Zoujiashan uranium deposit (fluorite-hyromica-uraninite association) and the Shazhou uranium deposit (alkali feldspar alteration-hemitite-uraninite association) are the two representatives of the ore-field. This paper presents Nd, Sr and Pb isotope compositions of these two uranium deposits and their wall rocks-the Xiangshan volcanic rocks. εNd(t) values (-6.7~-8.3) and initial 87Sr/86Sr ratios (0.7145~0.7207) of fluorite formed by the ore-forming hydrothermal fluid are similar to those of the wall rocks (εNd(t)=-6.2~-9.4, initial 87Sr/86Sr=0.7121~0.7192). In the εNd(t) vs. t diagram, the plot area of data points for fluorite of ore-forming stage is generally identical with that of the host rocks. Both of them fall within the evolution domain of Proterozoic basement in Xiangshan area. Pyrites from the ores have a linear correlation between 206Pb/204Pb and 207Pb/204Pb, while the wall rocks plot at the lower value end of this correlation line. From this line a reference age of 144Ma can be obtained, which is consistent with the age of the volcanic rocks (135~140Ma). This Nd-Sr-Pb isotope evidence suggests that the ore-forming materials were derived mainly from the Xiangshan volcanic rocks. The volcanic rocks were derived mainly from the crust which was similar to the exposed basement. Therefore, the main ore-forming materials were derived ultimately from the crust.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?