Abstract:Background: Sepsis is a common cause of serious illness and death. Sepsis management remains challenging and suboptimal. To support rapid sepsis diagnosis and treatment, screening tools have been embedded into hospital digital systems to appear as digital alerts. The implementation of digital alerts to improve the management of sepsis and deterioration is a complex intervention that has to fit with team workflow and the views and practices of hospital staff. Despite the importance of human decision-making and behavior in optimal implementation, there are limited qualitative studies that explore the views and experiences of health care professionals regarding digital alerts as sepsis or deterioration computerized clinician decision support systems (CCDSSs). Objective: This study aims to explore the views and experiences of health care professionals on the use of sepsis or deterioration CCDSSs and to identify barriers and facilitators to their implementation and use in National Health Service (NHS) hospitals. Methods: We conducted a qualitative, multisite study with unstructured observations and semistructured interviews with health care professionals from emergency departments, outreach teams, and intensive or acute units in 3 NHS hospital trusts in England. Data from both interviews and observations were analyzed together inductively using thematic analysis. Results: A total of 22 health care professionals were interviewed, and 12 observation sessions were undertaken. A total of four themes regarding digital alerts were identified: (1) support decision-making as nested in electronic health records, but never substitute professionals' knowledge and experience; (2) remind to take action according to the context, such as the hospital unit and the job role; (3) improve the alerts and their introduction, by making them more accessible, easy to use, not intrusive, more accurate, as well as integrated across the whole health care system; and (4) contextual factors affecting views and use of alerts in the NHS trusts. Digital alerts are more optimally used in general hospital units with a lower senior decision maker:patient ratio and by health care professionals with experience of a similar technology. Better use of the alerts was associated with quality improvement initiatives and continuous sepsis training. The trusts' features, such as the presence of a 24/7 emergency outreach team, good technological resources, and staffing and teamwork, favored a more optimal use. Conclusions: Trust implementation of sepsis or deterioration CCDSSs requires support on multiple levels and at all phases of the intervention, starting from a prego-live analysis addressing organizational needs and readiness. Advancements toward minimally disruptive and smart digital alerts as sepsis or deterioration CCDSSs, which are more accurate and specific but at the same time scalable and accessible, require policy changes and investments in multidisciplinary research.

Using the electronic health record to build a culture of practice safety: evaluating the implementation of trigger tools in one general practice.

An electronic trigger to detect telemedicine-related diagnostic errors

Development of a trigger tool to identify harmful incidents, no harm incidents, and near misses in prehospital emergency care

Developing a primary care patient measure of safety (PC PMOS): a modified Delphi process and face validity testing

Electronic health record-based behaviour change interventions aimed at general practitioners in the UK: a mixed methods systematic review using behaviour change theory

The emergency department trigger tool: Multicenter trigger query validation

Early warning tools and clinician 'agency' for strengthening safety culture: An integrative review

The Impact of an Electronic Patient Bedside Observation and Handover System on Clinical Practice: Mixed-Methods Evaluation

Developing a learning health system: Insights from a qualitative process evaluation of a pharmacist-led electronic audit and feedback intervention to improve medication safety in primary care

Learning from the design and development of the NHS Safety Thermometer

What are medical students' attitudes to clinical risk-scoring tools? An exploratory study

Development of Automated Triggers in Ambulatory Settings in Brazil: Protocol for a Machine Learning-Based Design Thinking Study

Prevalence of Triggers and Patient Harm Identified by Global Trigger Tool in Specialized Palliative Care

Culture counts--sustainable inpatient computerized surveillance across Duke University Health System

Views and Uses of Sepsis Digital Alerts in National Health Service Trusts in England: Qualitative Study With Health Care Professionals

Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Real-Time Safety Reporting by Hospitalized Patients and Their Care Partners: The MySafeCare Application

The practice of incident reporting and management: current challenges and opportunities for mental health trusts in England

A mixed-methods investigation of health professionals’ perceptions of a physiological track and trigger system

Application of Global Trigger Tools in University Hospital and Comparison to Volunteer Adverse Events Reporting System

Measuring the overall development of patient safety in a new hospital using trigger tools

Electronic medical record implementation in tertiary care: factors influencing adoption of an electronic medical record in a cancer centre