Factors in the etiology of fixations and symptom choice.

A. M. Johnson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21674086.1953.11925920

The Psychoanalytic Quarterly

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

A mixed-methods survey to explore views of staff and patients from mental health wards prior to introduction of a digital early warning system for physical deterioration

Neil Brimblecombe,Haddy Quist,Fiona Nolan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12511

Abstract:WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: The potential benefits of introducing technological innovation into all types of health services are recognized internationally. There are few studies exploring the use of technology in inpatient mental health settings, or the views of staff and patients regarding such developments. "Early warning systems" are increasingly used in inpatient mental health services to detect physical deterioration in patients and prompt staff to take appropriate action. We have identified no peer-reviewed publications concerning this development. WHAT THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: Using a questionnaire survey, this project gathered views from staff and patients on a planned change from a paper-based "early warning system" to one using handheld electronic devices (tablets). This study adds to the existing evidence by reporting specific staff and patient concerns about a technological development in an inpatient mental health setting. Some patients were concerned about confidentiality of data entered onto tablets. Whilst were either positive or neutral in attitude to the planned change some staff raised concerns that electronic devices could be used as weapons, and also that patients or visitors might misinterpret their use. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: Views of staff and patients must be considered when introducing new technology into clinical practice, in order to make the change successful and sustainable. Inadequate or unclear information about the use and purpose of electronic devices may lead to misunderstandings as to their purpose and the security of their data, particularly in mental health settings. Further exploration across a range of services and countries would be useful in determining whether attitudes towards implementing similar technological change in mental health practice are commonly shared. ABSTRACT: Introduction Technological innovation offers opportunities to improve mental health care; however, little evidence exists regarding attitudes of inpatient staff and patients to such changes. We present a survey of staff and patients prior to introduction of a digital version of the National Early Warning Score (eNEWS) system for identifying physical deterioration. Aim To collate views of staff and inpatients related to prospective use of eNEWS, to inform the plan for implementation. Method Paper questionnaires were distributed to both groups in six wards prior to eNEWS implementation. Two discussion groups were then held. Results Eighty-two staff and 26 inpatients completed questionnaires. Some inpatients expressed concerns about data confidentiality. Most staff were neutral or positive about the planned change, but raised possible safety risks and the risk of electronic recording being misinterpreted by patients. The implementation plan was modified in response to this information, principally by improving communication processes with patients. Discussion This study adds to the existing evidence by reporting specific staff and patient concerns towards a form of information technology. Further evaluations would help determine the transferability of these findings. Implications for practice Listening to patient and staff views about planned technological innovation is essential for effective implementation.
Nursing implications of an early warning system implemented to reduce adverse events: a qualitative study

Emilie J Braun,Siddhartha Singh,Annie C Penlesky,Erin A Strong,Jeana M Holt,Kathlyn E Fletcher,Michael E Stadler,Ann B Nattinger,Bradley H Crotty

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014498

Abstract:Background: Unrecognised changes in a hospitalised patient's clinical course may lead to a preventable adverse event. Early warning systems (EWS) use patient data, such as vital signs, nursing assessments and laboratory values, to aid in the detection of early clinical deterioration. In 2018, an EWS programme was deployed at an academic hospital that consisted of a commercially available EWS algorithm and a centralised virtual nurse team to monitor alerts. Our objective was to understand the nursing perspective on the use of an EWS programme with centralised monitoring. Methods: We conducted and audio-recorded semistructured focus groups during nurse staff meetings on six inpatient units, stratified by alert frequency (high: >100 alerts/month; medium: 50-100 alerts/month; low: <50 alerts/month). Discussion topics included EWS programme experiences, perception of EWS programme utility and EWS programme implementation. Investigators analysed the focus group transcripts using a grounded theory approach. Results: We conducted 28 focus groups with 227 bedside nurses across all shifts. We identified six principal themes: (1) Alert timeliness, nurses reported being aware of the patient's deterioration before the EWS alert, (2) Lack of accuracy, nurses perceived most alerts as false positives, (3) Workflow interruptions caused by EWS alerts, (4) Questions of actionability of alerts, nurses were often uncertain about next steps, (5) Concerns around an underappreciation of core nursing skills via reliance on the EWS programme and (6) The opportunity cost of deploying the EWS programme. Conclusion: This qualitative study of nurses demonstrates the importance of earning user trust, ensuring timeliness and outlining actionable next steps when implementing an EWS. Careful attention to user workflow is required to maximise EWS impact on improving hospital quality and patient safety.
Translating staff experience into organisational improvement: the HEADS-UP stepped wedge, cluster controlled, non-randomised trial

Samuel Pannick,Thanos Athanasiou,Susannah J Long,Iain Beveridge,Nick Sevdalis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014333

IF: 3.006

2017-07-01

BMJ Open

Abstract:OBJECTIVES: Frontline insights into care delivery correlate with patients' clinical outcomes. These outcomes might be improved through near-real time identification and mitigation of staff concerns. We evaluated the effects of a prospective frontline surveillance system on patient and team outcomes.DESIGN: Prospective, stepped wedge, non-randomised, cluster controlled trial; prespecified per protocol analysis for high-fidelity intervention delivery.PARTICIPANTS: Seven interdisciplinary medical ward teams from two hospitals in the UK.INTERVENTION: Prospective clinical team surveillance (PCTS): structured daily interdisciplinary briefings to capture staff concerns, with organisational facilitation and feedback.MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was excess length of stay (eLOS): an admission more than 24 hours above the local average for comparable patients. Secondary outcomes included safety and teamwork climates, and incident reporting. Mixed-effects models adjusted for time effects, age, comorbidity, palliation status and ward admissions. Safety and teamwork climates were measured with the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire. High-fidelity PCTS delivery comprised high engagement and high briefing frequency.RESULTS: Implementation fidelity was variable, both in briefing frequency (median 80% working days/month, IQR 65%-90%) and engagement (median 70 issues/ward/month, IQR 34-113). 1714/6518 (26.3%) intervention admissions had eLOS versus 1279/4927 (26.0%) control admissions, an absolute risk increase of 0.3%. PCTS increased eLOS in the adjusted intention-to-treat model (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.58, p=0.003). Conversely, high-fidelity PCTS reduced eLOS (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.94, p=0.006). High-fidelity PCTS also increased total, high-yield and non-nurse incident reports (incidence rate ratios 1.28-1.79, all p<0.002). Sustained PCTS significantly improved safety and teamwork climates over time.CONCLUSIONS: This study highlighted the potential benefits and pitfalls of ward-level interdisciplinary interventions. While these interventions can improve care delivery in complex, fluid environments, the manner of their implementation is paramount. Suboptimal implementation may have an unexpectedly negative impact on performance.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 34806867 (http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN34806867).

medicine, general & internal
Allied health professionals' experiences and lessons learned in response to a big bang electronic medical record implementation: A prospective observational study

Kath Feely,Lara Edbrooke,Wendy Bower,Sandra Mazzone,Mark Merolli,Julia Staples,Alicia Martin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105094

Abstract:Introduction: There is limited evidence describing the impact of electronic medical record (EMR) implementation on allied health professionals' acceptance, expectations, and work efficiencies. This study aims to: A) identify clinician expectations and factors that influence EMR acceptance; B) evaluate perceived usability, technology proficiency and satisfaction; and C) assess the impact of EMR big bang implementation on allied health workflows at three Australian tertiary hospitals. Methods: Repeated measures study pre and six-months post EMR implementation. User acceptance was evaluated with online surveys: Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (pre), System Usability Scale and open-ended questions (post). A four-hour time-motion study evaluated changes in allied health inpatient workflows. Results: Surveys were completed by 224 allied health clinicians (47% response rate) pre, and 196 (41%) post-implementation. Pre-implementation, 96% of respondents felt using the EMR was a good idea and they would find it useful. Six-months post-implementation 88% liked interacting with the EMR. 64% found it easy to use and most didn't require technical support (78%). While 68% of participants felt very confident, 51% believed they were not using the EMR's full potential. Post-implementation half of participants agreed significant upskilling was required and that EMR workflows were not quick to learn. Live demonstrations were considered the most helpful activity prior to training; hands-on practice in the training environment and superuser support were invaluable preparing for and during go-live. Time-motion data (mean difference (MD) (95% CI)) indicated that following implementation participants spent 2.27% (-3.53, 8.09, p = 0.731) more time in clinical tasks. More time was spent performing clinical documentation (5.39% (1.98, 8.8), p = 0.002). Conclusions: Many factors can impact allied health professional's adoption of a new EMR. Institution-wide, simultaneous big bang EMR implementation, with strong allied health leadership, can lead to positive benefits, particularly in user experience. Ongoing evaluation will drive future improvements.
Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Real-Time Safety Reporting by Hospitalized Patients and Their Care Partners: The MySafeCare Application

Sarah A. Collins,Brittany Couture,Ann DeBord Smith,Esteban Gershanik,Elizabeth Lilley,Frank Chang,Cathy Yoon,Stuart Lipsitz,Aziz Sheikh,James Benneyan,David W. Bates

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/pts.0000000000000493

2018-05-18

Journal of Patient Safety

Abstract:OBJECTIVE: The aims of the study were to evaluate the amount and content of data patients and care partners reported using a real-time electronic safety tool compared with other reporting mechanisms and to understand their perspectives on safety concerns and reporting in the hospital.METHODS: This study used mixed methods including 20-month preimplementation and postimplementation trial evaluating MySafeCare, a web-based application, which allows hospitalized patients/care partners to report safety concerns in real time. The study compared MySafeCare submission rates for three hospital units (oncology acute care, vascular intermediate care, medical intensive care) with submissions rates of Patient Family Relations (PFR) Department, a hospital service to address patient/family concerns. The study used triangulation of quantitative data with thematic analysis of safety concern submissions and patient/care partner interviews to understand submission content and perspectives on safety reporting.RESULTS: Thirty-two MySafeCare submissions were received with an average rate of 1.7 submissions per 1000 patient-days and a range of 0.3 to 4.8 submissions per 1000 patient-days across all units, indicating notable variation between units. MySafeCare submission rates were significantly higher than PFR submission rates during the postintervention period on the vascular unit (4.3 [95% confidence interval = 2.8-6.5] versus 1.5 [95% confidence interval = 0.7-3.1], Poisson) (P = 0.01). Overall trends indicated a decrease in PFR submissions after MySafeCare implementation. Triangulated data indicated patients preferred to report anonymously and did not want concerns submitted directly to their care team.CONCLUSIONS: MySafeCare evaluation confirmed the potential value of providing an electronic, anonymous reporting tool in the hospital to capture safety concerns in real time. Such applications should be tested further as part of patient safety programs.

health care sciences & services,health policy & services
Operating room coordination with the eWhiteboard: the fine line between successful and challenged technology adoption

Svetlena Taneva,Effie Law,Jacqueline Higgins,Anthony Easty,Bernhard Plattner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-011-0007-y

2011-09-22

Health and Technology

Abstract:With the goal to achieve a better understanding of the challenges to communication technology adoption in the clinical setting, we conducted intensive observations of activities of clinical and administrative staff in a large teaching hospital’s surgical unit prior to and 8-months post-implementation of an electronic whiteboard communication tool (eWhiteboard). The hospital IT department developed the e-Whiteboard for the support of inter-team coordination of patient status within the surgical flow. After the system had been integrated into the work process for 8 months, we conducted another round of intensive observations. The RATE data collection platform was utilized in both studies. Data were coded and analyzed quantitatively. Qualitative observational notes complemented the statistical results. We compared the pre- and post-implementation observational data with regard to communication load, types of coordination breakdowns, triggers, and consequences. Additionally, a questionnaire on perceived usefulness of the eWhiteboard was administered. We found that the introduction of the electronic whiteboard reduced the communication load associated with patient care. Participants reported the application useful and the overall satisfaction was rated very high. However, the observational data indicated an increase in coordination breakdowns related to patient status and the rise of an unanticipated communication load enabler and interruptions source – the lack of trust in other humans. We conclude that the types of metrics used to evaluate technology adoption may very well influence the outcomes reported. In the environment we studied, we identified a socio-technical issue, lack of trust in other humans, as the principle challenge to what would have otherwise been termed successful adoption. One implication is the development of a predictive model of user experience, including trust, based on strong candidate predictors derived from meta-analysis of existing related studies.

English Else
Enhanced early warning system impact on nursing practice: A phenomenological study

Kathleen A. Burns,Tracey Reber,Karen Theodore,Brenda Welch,Debra Roy,Sandra L. Siedlecki

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13517

IF: 3.057

2018-01-25

Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract:AIM: To determine how an enhanced early warning system has an impact on nursing practice.BACKGROUND: Early warning systems score physiologic measures and alert nurses to subtle changes in patient condition. Critics of early warning systems have expressed concern that nurses would rely on a score rather than assessment skills and critical thinking to determine the need for intervention. Enhancing early warning systems with innovative technology is still in its infancy, so the impact of an enhanced early warning system on nursing behaviours or practice has not yet been studied.DESIGN: Phenomenological design.METHODS: Scripted, semistructured interviews were conducted in September 2015 with 25 medical/surgical nurses who used the enhanced early warning system. Data were analysed using thematic analysis techniques (coding and bracketing). Emerging themes were examined for relationships and a model describing the enhanced early warning system experience was developed.FINDINGS: Nurses identified awareness leading to investigation and ease of prioritization as the enhanced early warning system's most important impact on their nursing practice. There was also an impact on organizational culture, with nurses reporting improved communication, increased collaboration, increased accountability and proactive responses to early changes in patient condition.CONCLUSIONS: Rather than hinder critical thinking, as many early warning systems' critics claim, nurses in this study found that the enhanced early warning system increased their awareness of changes in a patient's condition, resulting in earlier response and reassessment times. It also had an impact on the organization by improving communication and collaboration and supporting a culture of proactive rather than reactive response to early signs of deterioration.

nursing
Longitudinal evaluation of an electronic audit and feedback system for patient safety in a large tertiary hospital setting

James Soresi,Kevin Murray,Theresa Marshall,David B Preen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582241262707

2024-06-15

Health Informatics Journal

Abstract:Health Informatics Journal, Volume 30, Issue 2, April-June 2024. Objective: This study sought to assess the impact of a novel electronic audit and feedback (e-A&F) system on patient outcomes. Methods: The e-A&F intervention was implemented in a tertiary hospital and involved near real-time feedback via web-based dashboards. We used a segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series. We modelled the pre-post change in outcomes for the (1) announcement of this priority list, and (2) implementation of the e-A&F intervention to have affected patient outcomes. Results: Across the study period there were 222,792 episodes of inpatient care, of which 13,904 episodes were found to contain one or more HACs, a risk of 6.24%. From the point of the first intervention until the end of the study the overall risk of a HAC reduced from 8.57% to 4.12% - a 51.93% reduction. Of this reduction the proportion attributed to each of these interventions was found to be 29.99% for the announcement of the priority list and 21.93% for the implementation of the e-A&F intervention. Discussion: Our findings lend evidence to a mechanism that the announcement of a measurement framework, at a national level, can lead to local strategies, such as e-A&F, that lead to significant continued improvements over time.

health care sciences & services,medical informatics
Multidisciplinary user experience of a newly implemented electronic patient record in Ireland: An exploratory qualitative study

Anne-Marie Brady,Jennifer Fortune,Ahmed Hassan Ali,Geraldine Prizeman,Wing Ting To,Grainne Courtney,Kama Stokes,Miriam Roche

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105399

IF: 4.73

2024-02-29

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Abstract:Background Implementation of an Electronic Patient Record (EPR) in a key milestone in the digital strategy of modern healthcare organisations. The implementation of EPR systems can be viewed as challenging and complex. Objective The aim of the study was to investigate user perspectives and experiences of the implementation of an Electronic Medical Record in a major academic teaching hospital, with simultaneous 'go-live' across the whole hospital taking place. Methods Focus groups and individual in-depth interviews were conducted with stakeholders and users (n = 105), approximately nine months post-EPR implementation. The study explored EPR users' perceptions using an extended theoretical framework of the DeLone and McLean Information Systems Success Model (2003), which measured information systems, system quality, information quality, service quality, use/perceived usefulness & user satisfaction and net benefits. Results Staff engagement and satisfaction was high and the EPR is accepted as the new standard way of completing care. There was agreement that the EPR affords transparency, and greater accountability. There was some concern expressed regarding impact of the EPR on interprofessional and patient/provider interactions and communication. Physicians reported the inputting of social history through free text as an issue of concern and time consuming. The Big Bang approach with mandatory conversion was key to the successful adoption of EPR. There was consensus across professional and administrative respondents that there was no appetite to return to paper-based records. Conclusion The successful roll out of the EPR reflects the digital readiness of healthcare providers and organisations. The potential for unintended consequences on work process requires continual monitoring. A key future benefit of the EPR will be the capacity to reach a broader understanding and analysis of variation in processes and outcomes within healthcare organisations. It is clear though that the skills in data analytics will be needed to mine data successfully.

health care sciences & services,computer science, information systems,medical informatics
Remote video auditing with real-time feedback in an academic surgical suite improves safety and efficiency metrics: a cluster randomised study

Frank J Overdyk,Oonagh Dowling,Sheldon Newman,David Glatt,Michelle Chester,Donna Armellino,Brandon Cole,Gregg S Landis,David Schoenfeld,John F DiCapua

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004226

2015-12-11

Abstract:IMPORTANCE: Compliance with the surgical safety checklist during operative procedures has been shown to reduce inhospital mortality and complications but proper execution by the surgical team remains elusive.OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the impact of remote video auditing with real-time provider feedback on checklist compliance during sign-in, time-out and sign-out and case turnover times.DESIGN, SETTING: Prospective, cluster randomised study in a 23-operating room (OR) suite.PARTICIPANTS: Surgeons, anaesthesia providers, nurses and support staff.EXPOSURE: ORs were randomised to receive, or not receive, real-time feedback on safety checklist compliance and efficiency metrics via display boards and text messages, followed by a period during which all ORs received feedback.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Checklist compliance (Pass/Fail) during sign-in, time-out and sign-out demonstrated by (1) use of checklist, (2) team attentiveness, (3) required duration, (4) proper sequence and duration of case turnover times.RESULTS: Sign-in, time-out and sign-out PASS rates increased from 25%, 16% and 32% during baseline phase (n=1886) to 64%, 84% and 68% for feedback ORs versus 40%, 77% and 51% for no-feedback ORs (p<0.004) during the intervention phase (n=2693). Pass rates were 91%, 95% and 84% during the all-feedback phase (n=2001). For scheduled cases (n=1406, 71%), feedback reduced mean turnover times by 14% (41.4 min vs 48.1 min, p<0.004), and the improvement was sustained during the all-feedback period. Feedback had no effect on turnover time for unscheduled cases (n=587, 29%).CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our data indicate that remote video auditing with feedback improves surgical safety checklist compliance for all cases, and turnover time for scheduled cases, but not for unscheduled cases.

health care sciences & services,health policy & services
Implementation of bedside handover that includes patients or carers in hospital settings: A systematic review

Amy Maher,Henry Hsu,Mohamed Eftal Bin Mohamed Ebrahim,Matthew Vukasovic,Andrew Coggins

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14223

2024-10-31

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

Abstract:Objective Increasing complexity in healthcare systems necessitates effective handover. While a universal structure is often recommended, many frameworks do not include the patient. A systematic review was completed examining outcomes following handover that included patients or carers using a realist‐orientated paradigm. Methods The research group used CovidenceTM software and followed PRISMA guidelines. A librarian‐led search of Embase, Medline, PsycINFO and SCOPUS yielded 5,790 relevant studies for screening. Included studies reported on peer‐reviewed studies that assessed qualitative or quantitative outcomes resulting from patient‐centred handover. To assess quality, we used the McMaster Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Patient‐orientated and quantitative outcomes are reported descriptively. For qualitative outcomes, we employed a deductive analytical approach. Braun and Clarke's steps were followed to develop themes with group work used to clarify and discuss the various codes. Heterogenous reporting precluded meta‐analysis. Results Thirty studies were eligible (10 mixed methods; 11 quantitative; 9 qualitative) with variable quality and scope. Most studies related to nursing‐led bedside handover and originated in Anglophone countries. Positive effects were reported for patient satisfaction, engagement, autonomy and effective information exchange. Providers reported a positive experience but also barriers to implementation, cognitive load and reducing compliance over time. There were contradicting findings for patient‐orientated outcomes including falls risk. Publication bias may have led to under reporting of negative trials. There was limited reporting on physician‐led handovers that included patients. Conclusions Patient‐centred handover was associated with self‐reported benefits for patients and providers but potential advantages over conventional handover could be undermined by barriers such as time, implementation challenges and a perceived increase in staff workload.

medicine, general & internal,health care sciences & services,medical informatics
Wireless patient monitoring and Efficacy Safety Score in postoperative treatment at the ward: evaluation of time consumption and usability

Erlend Johan Skraastad,Petter Christian Borchgrevink,Lillian Asbøll Opøyen,Johan Ræder

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-023-01053-x

IF: 1.977

2023-07-19

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

Abstract:To evaluate objective time consumption and how nurses perceived introducing wireless patient monitoring (WPM) and a validated score on patient quality and safety, the Efficacy Safety Score (ESS), at a mixed surgery ward. After fulfilling a randomised controlled trial combining the ESS and WPM, we addressed time consumption and conducted a questionnaire survey among nurses who participated in the study. The questionnaire appraised the nurses' evaluation of introducing these tools for postoperative management. Of 28 invited nurses, 24 responded to the questionnaire, and 92% reported the ESS and WPM-systems to increase patient safety and quality of care. 67% felt the intervention took extra time, but objective workload measurements revealed reduced time to 1/3 using ESS and WPM compared to standard manual assessment. Improved confidence when using the systems was reported by 83% and improved working situation by 75%. In a test situation to measure time consumption, the ESS and pre-attached WPM-systems require less time than the conventional standard of care, and may allow for more frequent clinical monitoring at the post-surgical ward. The combination of the ESS and the WPM systems was perceived as positive by participating nurses and further clinical development and research is warranted.

anesthesiology
Quality improvement report: setting up a hospital at night service, limitations of bleep filtering and using an electronic task management system

Aaisha Saqib,Kevin Cairney,Karen Mcintyre,Emma Coutts,Tamara Stephens,Lesley Roberts,Sandip Banerjee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001007

2021-03-01

BMJ Open Quality

Abstract:The ‘hospital at night’ concept was developed at a joint conference of the London Deanery and Clinical Staff in 2002, as an issue for education and service provision. At the start of the project, our trust had issues with both the structure of the hospital at night handover and the working practices overnight. The vision was to improve team working out of hours, expedite review of sick patients and reorganise care to seek a reduction in bleeps to medical junior doctors overnight in a way that all patients had access to the right person with the right skills for their needs at the right time. The hospital at night project at our hospital was started in 2019 by a multidisciplinary working group. We tried bleep filtering for 4 months and this was later followed on by the development of an electronic out of hour’s task list as part of our hospital at night set-up. The bleep analysis data showed an improved distribution of workload but the process was dependent on individuals. The electronic task management system was built in pre-existing online software. The system helped prioritise and review tasks requested by nurses on medical wards. But it was not without its limitations. We worked with the local information technology (IT) team to improve speed and proposed developing an IT solution that is fast and not desktop based to ensure tasks can be assigned and viewed while on the go. The project was overall a success as it demonstrated positive feedback from junior doctors, improved perception of teamwork and ability to take rest breaks. It also demonstrated a drop in ward-based cardiac arrest rates. The hospital at night project at our trust remains a work in progress, but a lot of positive changes have been delivered.
Implementing and evaluating patient‐focused safety technology on adult acute mental health wards

Sarah Kendal,Gemma Louch,Lauren Walker,Saba Shafiq,Daisy Halligan,Lyn Brierley‐Jones,John Baker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.13028

2024-01-28

Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing

Abstract:Accessible Summary What is known on the subject Mental health wards can feel unsafe. We know that patients and staff have different ideas about what makes a hospital ward safe or unsafe. Patients are often the first to know when the atmosphere on a ward becomes tense, but often, no one asks them for their views. Patients and staff are experts and should be included in discussions about how to make wards safer. What this paper adds to existing knowledge We got together with some service users and staff, and made an app that helps patients to tell staff when they are not feeling safe on a mental health ward. We tried it out on six wards and we asked patients and staff what they thought. The app was easy to use and most people liked the look of it. Patients said staff did not talk with them enough and so they liked using the app. However, some staff said they could tell how patients were feeling without an app and so they did not need it. Ward managers told us that staff were often very busy and did not always have time to use the app. What are the implications for practice This app could help staff know straightaway when patients do not feel safe on the ward, so that they can act quickly to calm things down. To make the most of the app, staff need to get used to it and bring it into ward routines. Introduction Safety improvement on mental health wards is of international concern. It should incorporate patient perspectives. Aim Implementation and evaluation of 'WardSonar', a digital safety‐monitoring tool for adult acute mental health wards, developed with stakeholders to communicate patients' real‐time safety perceptions to staff. Method Six acute adult mental health wards in England implemented the tool in 2022. Evaluation over 10 weeks involved qualitative interviews (34 patients, 33 staff), 39 focused ethnographic observations, and analysis of pen portraits. Results Implementation and evaluation of the WardSonar tool was feasible despite challenging conditions. Most patients valued the opportunity to communicate their immediate safety concerns, stating that staff had a poor understanding of them. Some staff said the WardSonar tool could help enhanced ward safety but recognised a need to incorporate its use into daily routines. Others said they did not need the tool to understand patients' safety concerns. Discussion Foreseeable challenges, including staff ambivalence and practical issues, appeared intensified by the post‐COVID‐19 context. Implications for Practice The WardSonar tool could improve ward safety, especially from patients' perspectives. Future implementation could support staff to use the real‐time data to inform proactive safety interventions.

nursing,psychiatry
Analyzing Time Efficiency, Personnel Requirements, and Usability Impacts on Healthcare Administration

Matthias Fabian Berger,Johanna Petritsch,Andrzej Hecker,Sabrina Pustak,Birgit Michelitsch,Chiara Banfi,Lars-Peter Kamolz,David Benjamin Lumenta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13206214

IF: 3.9

2024-10-19

Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract:Background: This study investigates the impact of transitioning from paper and pencil (P&P) methods to electronic patient records (EPR) on workflow and usability in surgical ward rounds. Methods: Surgical ward rounds were audited by two independent observers to evaluate the effects of transitioning from P&P to EPR. Key observations included the number of medical personnel and five critical workflow aspects before and after EPR implementation. Additionally, usability was assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS) and the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ). Results: A total of 192 P&P and 160 EPR observations were analyzed. Physicians experienced increased administrative workload with EPR, while nurses adapted more easily. Ward teams typically consisted of two physicians and three or four nurses. Usability scores rated the system as "Not Acceptable" across all professional groups. Conclusions: The EPR system introduced usability challenges, particularly for physicians, despite potential benefits like improved data access. Usability flaws hindered system acceptance, highlighting the need for better workflow integration. Addressing these issues could improve efficiency and reduce administrative strain. As artificial intelligence becomes more integrated into clinical practice, healthcare professionals must critically assess AI-driven tools to ensure safe and effective patient care.

medicine, general & internal
Confidence about an odds ratio.

B. Waning,W. Mccloskey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/AJHP/56.19.1989

1999-10-01

American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy

Abstract:
Impact of electronic health record technology on the work and workflow of physicians in the intensive care unit

Pascale Carayon,Tosha B. Wetterneck,Bashar Alyousef,Roger L. Brown,Randi S. Cartmill,Kerry McGuire,Peter L.T. Hoonakker,Jason Slagle,Kara S. Van Roy,James M. Walker,Matthew B. Weinger,Anping Xie,Kenneth E. Wood

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.04.002

IF: 4.73

2015-08-01

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of EHR technology on the work and workflow of ICU physicians and compare time spent by ICU resident and attending physicians on various tasks before and after EHR implementation.DESIGN: EHR technology with electronic order management (CPOE, medication administration and pharmacy system) and physician documentation was implemented in October 2007.MEASUREMENT: We collected a total of 289 h of observation pre- and post-EHR implementation. We directly observed the work of residents in three ICUs (adult medical/surgical ICU, pediatric ICU and neonatal ICU) and attending physicians in one ICU (adult medical/surgical ICU).RESULTS: EHR implementation had an impact on the time distribution of tasks as well as the temporal patterns of tasks. After EHR implementation, both residents and attending physicians spent more of their time on clinical review and documentation (40% and 55% increases, respectively). EHR implementation also affected the frequency of switching between tasks, which increased for residents (from 117 to 154 tasks per hour) but decreased for attendings (from 138 to 106 tasks per hour), and the temporal flow of tasks, in particular around what tasks occurred before and after clinical review and documentation. No changes in the time spent in conversational tasks or the physical care of the patient were observed.CONCLUSIONS: The use of EHR technology has a major impact on ICU physician work (e.g., increased time spent on clinical review and documentation) and workflow (e.g., clinical review and documentation becoming the focal point of many other tasks). Further studies should evaluate the impact of changes in physician work on the quality of care provided.

health care sciences & services,computer science, information systems,medical informatics
A New Triangular Matching Approach for Latent Palmprint Identification

José Hernández Palancar,Alfredo Muñoz-Briseño,A. Alonso

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41827-3_37

2013-11-20

Abstract:
Benefits of electronic charts in intensive care and during a world health pandemic: advantages of the technology age

Tanya Pankhurst,Laurie Lucas,Steve Ryan,Chris Ragdale,Helen Gyves,Louise Denner,Ian Young,Laura Rathbone,Anwar Shah,Deborah McKee,Jamie J Coleman,Felicity Evison,Jolene Atia,David Rosser,Mark Garrick,Richard Baker,Suzy Gallier,Simon Ball

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001704

2023-01-01

BMJ Open Quality

Abstract:Aims and objectives This study sets out to describe benefits from the implementation of electronic observation charting in intensive care units (ICU). This was an extension to the existing hospital wide digital health system. We evaluated error reduction, time-savings and the costs associated with conversion from paper to digital records. The world health emergency of COVID-19 placed extraordinary strain on ICU and staff opinion was evaluated to test how well the electronic system performed. Methods A clinically led project group working directly with programmers developed an electronic patient record for intensive care. Data error rates, time to add data and to make calculations were studied before and after the introduction of electronic charts. User feedback was sought pre and post go-live (during the COVID-19 pandemic) and financial implications were calculated by the hospital finance teams. Results Error rates equating to 219 000/year were avoided by conversion to electronic charts. Time saved was the equivalent of a nursing shift each day. Recurrent cost savings per year were estimated to be £257k. Staff were overwhelmingly positive about electronic charts in ICU, even during a health pandemic and despite redeployment into intensive care where they were using the electronic charts for the first time. Discussion Electronic ICU charts have been successfully introduced into our institution with benefits in terms of patient safety through error reduction and improved care through release of nursing time. Costs have been reduced. Staff feel supported by the digital system and report it to be helpful even during redeployment and in the unfamiliar environment of intensive care.
Quantitative detection of screening for cervical lesions with ThinPrep Cytology Test

Hong-xin Zhang,Yi-min Song,Su Li,Yu-hui Yin,D. Gao,Kuisheng Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/S11805-010-0535-7

2010-12-02

Abstract:

Factors in the etiology of fixations and symptom choice.

A mixed-methods survey to explore views of staff and patients from mental health wards prior to introduction of a digital early warning system for physical deterioration

Nursing implications of an early warning system implemented to reduce adverse events: a qualitative study

Translating staff experience into organisational improvement: the HEADS-UP stepped wedge, cluster controlled, non-randomised trial

Allied health professionals' experiences and lessons learned in response to a big bang electronic medical record implementation: A prospective observational study

Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Real-Time Safety Reporting by Hospitalized Patients and Their Care Partners: The MySafeCare Application

Operating room coordination with the eWhiteboard: the fine line between successful and challenged technology adoption

Enhanced early warning system impact on nursing practice: A phenomenological study

Longitudinal evaluation of an electronic audit and feedback system for patient safety in a large tertiary hospital setting

Multidisciplinary user experience of a newly implemented electronic patient record in Ireland: An exploratory qualitative study

Remote video auditing with real-time feedback in an academic surgical suite improves safety and efficiency metrics: a cluster randomised study

Implementation of bedside handover that includes patients or carers in hospital settings: A systematic review

Wireless patient monitoring and Efficacy Safety Score in postoperative treatment at the ward: evaluation of time consumption and usability

Quality improvement report: setting up a hospital at night service, limitations of bleep filtering and using an electronic task management system

Implementing and evaluating patient‐focused safety technology on adult acute mental health wards

Analyzing Time Efficiency, Personnel Requirements, and Usability Impacts on Healthcare Administration

Confidence about an odds ratio.

Impact of electronic health record technology on the work and workflow of physicians in the intensive care unit

A New Triangular Matching Approach for Latent Palmprint Identification

Benefits of electronic charts in intensive care and during a world health pandemic: advantages of the technology age

Quantitative detection of screening for cervical lesions with ThinPrep Cytology Test