Abstract:Peer assessment (PA) is employed as one fundamental practice of classroom-based assessment in terms of its learning-oriented and formative nature. The exercise of peer assessment has multiple and additional benefits for student learning. However, research into the learning processes in peer assessment is scarce both in theory and in practice, making it difficult to evaluate and pinpoint its value as a tool in assessment as learning (AaL). This study focuses both on the learning process and outcome through assessment activities. We set out with three goals in mind: (1) to examine students' assessment performance in context, (2) to evaluate its impact on student progress, and (3) to illuminate teachers on organizing assessment activities. Three specific research questions are answered in this study: (1) How do student raters perform in the process of PA in an advanced English class? (2) To what extent do assessment activities influence the students' speaking ability? (3) What are students' perceptions of PA regarding its benefits and caveats? A total of 29 undergraduate students participated in two assessment activities on argumentative speaking. Many-Facet Rasch Model analysis was conducted to measure the rater effects both at the group level and the individual level. Bias/interaction analyses were performed to diagnose rater behavior in different contexts including the rating session, speaking session, and peer assessment vs. self-assessment. Questionnaire and semi-structured interview data were also collected to explore factors and strategies that could interfere with PA as AaL. Results show that students exhibited stable rating behavior and made progress in argumentative speaking in all dimensions, including delivery, organization, and language use. They are more stringent with themselves than with peers although there is one rare case with a bias against peers. Participants acknowledged the benefits of PA but also shared reasonable concerns in practice. This study validated the feasibility and the effectiveness of PA for student learning. Discussion on findings and guidelines for effective implementation of PA as AaL are provided.

A comparison of student and staff perceptions and feelings about assessment and feedback using cartoon annotation

Use of online asynchronous discussion boards to engage students, enhance critical thinking, and foster staff-student/student-student collaboration: A mixed method study

Exploring the Emotional Responses of Undergraduate Students to Assessment Feedback: Implications for Instructors

Emotions Experienced by Instructors Delivering Written Feedback and Dialogic Feed-Forward

‘This is not what I need’: conflicting assessment feedback beliefs in a post-secondary institution in Hong Kong

Illustrating assessment: how Hong Kong university students conceive of the purposes of assessment

Improving the student learning experience through dialogic feed-forward assessment

Annoyance and frustration: Emotional responses to being assessed in higher education

From copying to learning: using exemplars to engage students with assessment criteria and feedback

Feelings About Feedback: The Role of Emotions in Assessment for Learning

Emotions as student feedback

The affective effect: Exploring undergraduate students’ emotions in giving and receiving peer feedback

Grudges and gratitude: the social-affective impacts of peer assessment

A literature survey on student feedback assessment tools and their usage in sentiment analysis

Assessment as Learning: How Does Peer Assessment Function in Students' Learning?

Student feedback literacy and engagement with feedback: a case study of Chinese undergraduate students

“I feel sad”: Students’ voices on lecturer’s feedback on Google Docs

Inside the Next Black Box: Examining Students’ Responses to Teacher Feedback in a Formative Assessment Context

Fostering A Teaching And Learning Opportunity: Toward Equity In Student Feedback Of Teaching

The role of relationships and emotions in student perceptions of learning and assessment

Demystifying anxiety and demotivation in on-line assessment: a focus on the impacts on academic buoyancy and autonomy