Abstract:Background: Feedback, if effectively provided by the teacher and utilised by the learner, enables improvement in academic performance. It is clear from current literature that the provision of feedback by teachers is not sufficient on its own to guarantee improvements as early university entrants may not be sufficiently equipped to effectively engage with feedback. Nonetheless, it is critical for health professional students to develop feedback literacy early, in order to prepare them for a professional career of lifelong learning and critical thinking. The overarching aim of this study was to identify a feasible, sustainable approach to improve feedback literacy among students on pre-qualifying health professional programmes. Methods: The study was divided into two phases. A mixed-methods approach grounded in constructivism was employed. Participants included teachers and learners from the School of Allied Health at X University, and two internationally acclaimed educationalists. In phase 1, first year students were encouraged to use an established online platform to upload modular feedback and develop personal learning action plans aimed at improving academic performance. A follow-up survey highlighted poor engagement with this method. Thus, the second phase focused on the co-construction of a suite of modules to develop these skills, supported by academic staff. Interviews were conducted with participants to review and refine this initiative. Results: Learners' engagement with the first phase of the study was poor. Thus, the second phase provided all stakeholders with the opportunity to feed into the development of a suite of modules, designed to encourage teachers and learners to work in partnership to nurture these skills. All stakeholder groups reported short- and long-term benefits with this approach, but also highlighted challenges towards its implementation. Conclusion: The development of feedback literacy among health professional learners is essential. The transferability of such skills has been highlighted in the literature and by all stakeholder groups involved in this study. Finding a balance between introducing these skills at a time early enough to highlight their importance among university entrants is challenging. Further balance must be achieved between the workload required to achieve these skills and current programme demands for both teachers and learners.

Improving the student learning experience through dialogic feed-forward assessment

Emotions Experienced by Instructors Delivering Written Feedback and Dialogic Feed-Forward

Longitudinal perspectives on students’ experiences of feedback: a need for teacher–student partnerships

A feedback journey: employing a constructivist approach to the development of feedback literacy among health professional learners

Peer-to-peer dialogue about teachers’ written feedback enhances students’ understanding on how to improve writing skills

A written, reflective and dialogic strategy for assessment feedback that can enhance student/teacher relationships

‘This is not what I need’: conflicting assessment feedback beliefs in a post-secondary institution in Hong Kong

From copying to learning: using exemplars to engage students with assessment criteria and feedback

From monologue to dialogue: improving written feedback processes in mass higher education

Fostering A Teaching And Learning Opportunity: Toward Equity In Student Feedback Of Teaching

Teacher feedback literacy, feedback regimes and iterative change: towards enhanced value in feedback processes

Exploring the Emotional Responses of Undergraduate Students to Assessment Feedback: Implications for Instructors

Developing student feedback literacy through self and peer assessment interventions

Feedback seeking and student reflective feedback literacy: a sociocultural discourse analysis

Students’ engagement across a typology of teacher feedback practices

Evaluating the Impact of Two Dialogical Feedback Methods for Improving Pre-Service Teacher's Perceived Confidence and Competence to Teach Physical Education Within Authentic Learning Environments

Assessment IS learning: developing a student‐centred approach for assessment in Higher Education

Feedback, feedback-on-feedback and re-feedback: effects of written dialogic peer feedback on English as a foreign language writing

A comparison of student and staff perceptions and feelings about assessment and feedback using cartoon annotation

Are they using my feedback? The extent of students’ feedback use has a large impact on subsequent academic performance

Making peer feedback work: the contribution of technology-mediated dialogic peer feedback to feedback uptake and literacy