Does the Timing of Auditor Changes Affect Audit Quality? Evidence From the Initial Year of the Audit Engagement

Cory A. Cassell,James C. Hansen,Linda A. Myers,Timothy A. Seidel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X17726241

2019-10-05

Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance

Abstract:Journal of Accounting, Auditing &Finance, Ahead of Print.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The Effect of the Timing of Auditor Changes on Annual Reporting Lags and Audit Quality

Wu Lina,Shu Xiaohui

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2006.11.006

2006-01-01

Abstract:This paper investigates the effect of the timing of auditor changes on annual reporting lags and audit quality.The evidence indicates that annual reporting lags increase dramatically and the audit quality is significantly lower for listed firms that change their auditors late for their fiscal year's financial reports,compared to the firms that change their auditors early for their fiscal year's financial reports.
Does Audit Partner Workload Compression Affect Audit Quality?

Jun Chen,Wang Dong,Hongling Han,Nan Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2020.1726196

2020-01-01

European Accounting Review

Abstract:The effect of workload compression on the behavior of individual auditors has received extensive attention from regulators and scholars. We study this effect by utilizing two unique institutional features of the Chinese capital market: (1) the auditor signature requirement that reveals audit partner identities and (2) the uniform December 31 fiscal year-end that intensifies workload compression for audit partners. Calculated based on audit fees, our new measure of audit partner workload compression (APWC) is negatively related to accruals quality and the probability of modified audit opinions, while positively associated with the propensity to report small profits and the prospect of audit report delays. Nevertheless, accounting firms and client firms with audit partners facing workload compression are not more likely to receive government sanctions. These findings imply that APWC impairs audit quality but not to the extent that it would lead to egregious outcomes. Our evidence supports the PCAOB call to monitor workloads for individual auditors.
What are the Drivers of Audit Quality after an Auditor Change? Evidence from Voluntary and Mandatory Auditor Switches

Ulf Mohrmann

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2589486

2016-04-21

Abstract:While the accounting literature implies that increased discretionary accruals follow auditor changes, the underlying causal mechanism of this increase remains unclear. The potential reasons are the loss of the auditor’s firm-specific knowledge or the firm’s opportunistic choice of a new auditor. Differentiating between the drivers is important to understand the consequences of auditor changes and to decide on a regulatory reaction. Using the unique legal environment in the European Union, this study uses both voluntary and mandatory auditor changes to distinguish between these explanations. Whereas the loss of firm-specific knowledge affects both types of auditor changes, mandatory changes are less affected by opportunistic choices. I find that voluntary auditor changes are positively associated with discretionary accruals but not mandatory changes. The difference between the mandatory and voluntary changes is highly significant even after controlling for self-selection. Thus, the decrease in reporting quality is due to the strategic decision to change the auditor rather than to the loss of firm-specific knowledge.

Economics,Law,Business
The effect of changing fiscal year-ends on audit fees and audit quality

Angel Arturo Pacheco Paredes,Clark Wheatley

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/jfep-07-2019-0140

2019-11-03

Journal of Financial Economic Policy

Abstract:Purpose This study aims to extend recent research analyzing the effect of auditor busyness on audit quality. Specifically, this study explores the effect on audit quality of a change of fiscal year-end to or from an audit firm’s busy period. Design/methodology/approach Empirical archival. Findings When firms change their fiscal year-end to a period when the auditor is less busy, client firms are rewarded with lower audit fees and auditors are rewarded with a reduction in required effort. This study finds no difference in the level of audit quality after a change in fiscal year-end. Practical implications There are significant implications for audit firms as they may gain cost advantages by successfully promoting off-season fiscal year-ends, and reduce the negative effect on employees associated with “busy season” stress. Similarly, client firms may find that audit costs are reduced when they adopt a less “busy” fiscal year-end. Social implications These results have policy implications for regulators because regulators often dictate the fiscal year-end for certain industries or traded securities. Such dictates may thus introduce inefficiencies into the market for audit services. Originality/value These results should guide regulators in their decisions to dictate fiscal year-ends and firms in their choice of reporting periods.
Till Death Do Us Part: An Examination of the Impact of Unbroken Auditor-Client Relationships on Audit Efficiency and Audit Quality

Dahlia Robinson,Thomas Smith,Stephanie Walton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-2021-022

2023-09-01

Abstract:SUMMARY We examine whether audit engagements where the client has never switched auditors (original auditors) are associated with different audit fee and audit quality outcomes, relative to engagements that have experienced an auditor change. We document that clients with original auditors accrue nontrivial audit fee savings. Further, we find original auditor engagements are associated with lower levels of discretionary accruals and lower likelihood of misstatements, implying higher audit quality. We also find that investors appear to recognize the audit fee and quality benefits, as these auditors receive fewer votes from investors against their ratification. These results are consistent with a reduction in information asymmetry from greater client specific knowledge with original auditors, leading to more efficient and effective audits. Finally, we document that the audit fee and audit quality benefits diminish for engagements that exceed 40 years, providing some support for the benefit of an eventual fresh look in the audit. Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cited in the text. JEL Classifications: G18; H83; M4.

business, finance
Can Auditor Change Improve Audit Quality for Listed Firms?From Experience of Repeat Restatement

Ma Che

Abstract:This study extends prior literature by examining the incidence of auditor change in the year following restatement announcement and whether auditor change is affected by restatement characteristics.We document a higher likelihood of auditor change in the twelve-month period following restatement announcement for restating firms than for non-restating firms in both univariate and multivariate tests.This evidence is consistent with the notion that firms aim to restore reputation following restatements.Looking closer,we document that number of years restated and number of accounting errors contained in one restatement report are positively related to the incidence of auditor change.We also found that although restatement direction and magnitude do not significantly affect auditor change,restatement magnitude is negatively related to the incidence of auditor change among firms with income-decreasing restatement,showing that firms with income-decreasing restatement are more concerned about magnitude when making decision about replacing auditors or not.Furthermore,we document that firms with auditor change following restatement announcement are more likely to experience repeat restatement of their financial statements audited by successor auditors in the period subsequent to the auditor change.This finding is consistent with the notion that audit quality for firms with auditor change experiencing restatement still remains low,difficult for them to regain credibility.

Business
Anticipation of Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation and Audit Quality

Nicolas Pappert,C. Friedrich,R. Quick

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3693129

2021-09-01

Abstract:Researchers and regulators regularly debate whether mandatory audit firm rotation affects audit quality. Theoretically, rotation might improve auditor independence but impair competence. In 2014, the European Commission mandated audit firm rotation for public-interest entities, starting from 2020 for nonfinancial firms. However, any auditor change in the transition period could already be interpreted in light of the upcoming mandatory rotation regime, consistent with anecdotal evidence on such interpretations. These changes provide a unique setting because auditors have strong incentives to build a reputation for high-quality audits when choosing to participate in the market for rotations during the transition period. Using a balanced panel of 287 German firms and data from 2014 through 2019, we hypothesize and find lower discretionary accruals, abnormal working capital accruals, and total accruals in the first year after rotation. This effect is restricted to smaller public companies. Data Availability: The data are from public sources and are available from the third author upon written request. JEL Classifications: M42; M48.

Economics,Law,Business
Do Auditors Consider Predecessor Auditors' Credit?——Predecessor Auditors' Audit Quality and Discretionary Accrual

Song Yanheng,Zhang Haiyan

2008-01-01

Abstract:This study analyzes the impact of predecessor auditor's quality on discretionary accrual during the first year with the successor. We find that " Big Four" is more conservative toward new customers whose predecessors are "non-Big four". During the first year,discretionary accrual for this group of new customers is lower than other firms audited by " Big Four" , and is also lower than firms switching from other " Big Four". The results suggest that " Big Four" has realized the risk associated with customers from "non-Big Four". However,"non-Big four" place no discrimination toward new customers: discretionary accrual of new customers is not significantly different from that of existing customers,no matter the new customer switches from "Big Four" or not. To some extent,our results suggest that local auditing firms are less sensitive to auditor risk than their international peers.
Leader Versus Lagger: How the Timing of Financial Reports Affects Audit Quality and Investment Efficiency

Nanqin Liu,Xiao-Jun Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3579139

IF: 3.6

2024-01-01

Contemporary Accounting Research

Abstract:This paper examines how the relative timing affects the quality of financial reports in a staggered reporting system. We show that the audit quality of the leader firm exceeds that of the lagger. Investment efficiency also differs systematically across firms depending on the relative reporting timing as well as the ownership structure of audit firms. We characterize optimal auditing standards and show, as regulatory tools, how imposing minimum audit quality requirement and adjusting auditors' legal liability complement and/or substitute.
The effects of audit partner pre-client and client-specific experience on audit quality and on perceptions of audit quality

Wuchun Chi,Linda A. Myers,Thomas C. Omer,Hong Xie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-016-9376-9

IF: 4.011

2016-10-29

Review of Accounting Studies

Abstract:We examine the associations between audit partner pre-client and client-specific experience and audit quality using data from Taiwan, where signing audit partner names are disclosed. Using discretionary accruals and interest rate spreads to proxy for audit quality and perceptions of audit quality, respectively, we find that both pre-client and client-specific experience improve audit quality and creditor perceptions of audit quality. We also find that audit partner pre-client experience is positively associated with audit quality early in the engagement, but not when the partner has been with the client for at least five years. Our findings provide evidence consistent with the assumption underlying the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s decision to require the disclosure of engagement partner names. They also suggest that pre-client experience cannot completely mitigate the loss of client-specific knowledge when partner or audit firm turnover occurs.

business, finance
Auditor Changes and Management's Issuance of Earnings Forecasts

Yonghong Jia,Xinghua Gao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12922

IF: 3.6

2023-12-08

Contemporary Accounting Research

Abstract:Auditor changes are significant corporate events marking disruptions in the auditor‐client relationship. Prior studies have primarily examined the impact of such changes on audit quality and investment decisions of market participants. We study the effect of auditor changes on the voluntary disclosure of forward‐looking information. Managers may choose to reduce disclosure due to the possible adverse effect of the disruptions on disclosure credibility. Alternatively, shareholders may demand increased disclosure to intensify monitoring, as the auditor change signals potential issues between the company and the auditor. Employing multiple identification strategies, we find that firms are less likely to issue management earnings forecasts (MEFs) following auditor changes. We also find that governance quality mitigates the negative impact of auditor changes on the issuance of MEFs. Additionally, auditor changes are associated with lower market reactions to forecast releases. The overall evidence is consistent with the notion of reduced forecast credibility. Lastly, we conduct cross‐sectional analyses on characteristics of the auditor changes and find evidence consistent with signaling and anticipated successor audit quality to be underlying mechanisms for the association between auditor changes and MEFs. Our study provides the first large sample evidence that auditor changes have a disruptive effect on the voluntary disclosure of forward‐looking information. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

business, finance
THE RELATION BETWEEN ENGAGEMENT QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW HOURS AND AUDITOR CHANGES: EVIDENCE FROM SOUTH KOREA

Jae-Won Song,Yong-Shik Kim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2021.14934

2021-09-06

Journal of Business Economics and Management

Abstract:The purpose of this study is to analyze whether engagement quality control review (EQCR) hours affect auditor changes and whether abnormal audit fees and changes in management have moderating effects on the relation between EQCR hours and auditor changes. The logit regression model is designed to investigate the relation between EQCR hours and auditor changes. The study finds evidence that EQCR hours are higher before auditors are changed. It also documents that abnormal audit fees weaken and that changes in management strengthen the positive relation between EQCR hours and auditor changes. In summary, high EQCR hours increase the probability of auditor changes, and the results imply that EQCR hours are a proxy for the audit risk perceived by auditors. This research is the first empirical study to test the relation between EQCR hours and auditor changes.

economics,business
Audit Firm Change, Initial Audit Fee Discount and Audit Quality

Zhang Rui,Tian Gaoliang,Qi Baolei,Han Jie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14120/j.cnki.cn11-5057/f.2018.02.017

2018-01-01

Management Review

Abstract:This paper chooses Chinese A-share listed firms in 2007-2014 to explore whether initial audit fee discount occurs in different situations of audit firm change and the impact of this phenomenon on audit quality.Empirical results show that after controlling for the effects of audit firm merger on audit fees and audit quality,initial audit fee discount occurs not only when the audit firm and two signing auditors change simultaneously but also when the audit firm changes with one or two signing auditors remaining the same;the initial audit fee discount in the former situation impairs audit quality while the fee discount in the latter situation doesn't.Further research suggests that after removing the samples of audit firm merger,the conclusion is still valid;initial audit fee discount is still significant in the first year after the audit firm and two signing auditors change simultaneously;the removal of modified audit opinion is more likely when the audit firm and two signing auditors change simultaneously along with initial audit fee discount.This paper has some theoretical and practical importance for maintaining relationship with audit clients,guaranteeing audit quality and developing audit profession.
The Effect of Engagement Auditors on Financial Statement Comparability

Liuchuang Li,Baolei Qi,Jieying Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-19-061

2021-01-20

Abstract:SUMMARY Prior literature finds that audit firm style shapes client financial statement comparability (Francis, Pinnuck, and Watanabe 2014). We expect that engagement partners also shape financial statement comparability, and find that two clients audited by the same engagement auditor have more comparable accruals than two clients audited by different auditors. We also find that engagement auditor past comparability style explains new client comparability with industry peers, suggesting that auditor style persists over time. We uncover that auditor personal traits including gender, experience, qualification, and specialization are associated with higher comparability. Finally, we find that adding the audit-firm, audit-office, and engagement-auditor fixed effects increases the adjusted R2 of our accrual comparability model by 0.6 percent, 1.9 percent, and 10 percent, respectively. Taken together, our findings suggest that the engagement auditors have a distinguishable effect on financial statement comparability that is incremental to the effect of audit firms and offices. Data Availability: All data are publicly available from the sources identified in the text.
Auditor Career Concerns, Audit Fees and Audit Quality

Hsihui Chang,Junxiong Fang,Phyllis Lai Lan Mo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2021.1947860

2021-01-01

Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics

Abstract:This study examines how engagement signing auditors' career concerns affect audit fees and audit quality. Based on a sample of listed companies in China, we find that audit fees and audit quality are lower for firms audited by auditors in their early years of being signing auditors. Moreover, we find that the results are more pronounced for signing auditors in local Chinese audit firms than those in Big 4. These results may be attributed to differential quality control mechanism and incentive systems. Our results have implications for regulators and audit firms in formulating standards and guidelines on monitoring newly promoted signing auditors.
Auditor Tenure, Information Asymmetry and Earnings Quality

Sidney Leung,Bin Srinidhi,Lingmin Xie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2941949

2017-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:We confirm the results of prior studies that auditor tenure improves earnings quality on average. We extend their findings to show that the improvement in earnings quality resulting from longer auditor tenure is greater for firms with higher information asymmetry, after controlling for auditor’s industry specialization. We argue that audits of client firms with higher information asymmetry demand more client specific knowledge that cannot be gleaned from industry or general experience. Longer tenure helps auditors acquire such knowledge and therefore, the benefit of longer audit tenure is greater in firms with greater information asymmetry. We use bid-ask spread, return volatility, intensity of R&D expenditure and a composite distance measure to measure information asymmetry. Our results imply that frequent auditor changes are costlier for firms with higher information asymmetry. At the policy level, our results imply that mandatory auditor rotation is more (less) costly for firms with high (low) information asymmetry.
Auditor tenure and Audit Quality:Empirical Evidence from the Chinese Securities Market

Chen Xinyuan,Xia Lijun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2006.01.008

2006-01-01

Abstract:This paper,using the data of those listed firms that received clean audit opinions during 2000 to 2002 in the Chinese Securities Market,and measuring audit quality by the discretionary accruals calculated by the Cross-sectional Jones Model,investigates the relationship between auditor tenure and audit quality.We find that,after controlling the influence of other variables,the relationship between auditor tenure and the absolute value of discretionary accruals is “U” shape,i.e.,the relationship between auditor tenure and audit quality is inverse “U” shape.Further analysis indicates that,when auditor tenure is less than 6 years,the increase of tenure has positive effects on audit quality,but when auditor tenure is more than 6 years,it has negative effects on audit quality.
The effect of individual auditor quality on audit outcomes: opening the black box of audit quality

Derrald Stice,Han Stice,Roger White

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/maj-07-2021-3235

2022-05-10

Managerial Auditing Journal

Abstract:Purpose This study aims to examine the effect of individual auditor quality (below the partner level) on overall audit quality. Design/methodology/approach We aggregate audit employee-level individual performance evaluations to create a measure of auditor quality at the office level. Findings We find that high-quality audit offices are associated with a lower likelihood of client restatement, fewer client abnormal accruals and a higher likelihood of a client receiving a going concern opinion. We partition employees into low, medium and high level, based on job title, to investigate which employee levels drive these results. We find that the restatement results are driven by high quality high-level employees (Senior Managers/Directors), whereas the going concern results are driven by high quality low-level employees (Seniors). Furthermore, we find evidence that high-quality audit teams are associated with all aspects of audit quality and the magnitude of these team effects are much larger than those of the effects for any individual employee type. Originality/value Our findings are consistent with higher-level auditors preventing the most serious financial statement deficiencies, low-level employees contributing to audit firm independence and overall team quality creating synergy which has the strongest effect on all aspects of audit quality. These insights based on individual auditor evaluations are new to the literature. Overall, our empirical results suggest that individual auditor quality is associated with higher quality audits and that employees at all levels affect audit outcomes.

management,business, finance
Individual Auditor Style and Audit Quality in a High Reputation Risk Setting

Vlad-Andrei Porumb,Abe de Jong,Carel Huijgen,Teye A. Marra,Jan van Dalen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3048713

2017-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:This paper tests whether the “style” of individual auditors shapes abnormal accruals in a setting where reputation risk is the main driver of audit quality. The German audit environment is characterized by high reputation risk and is one of the few where listed companies are required to report the names of individual engagement and review partners. This allows us to use the methodology pioneered by Bertrand and Schoar (Quarterly Journal of Economics 118, 2003: 1169-1208) and apply fixed effects models to measure the impact of individual auditors’ style on audit quality. Our results confirm the relevance of reputation risk and suggest that, after controlling for audit firm and audit office effects, individual audit partners have a detectable influence on the abnormal accruals of their clientele. This outcome is consistent with audit quality in German corporations being a function of distinct firm, office, and individual auditor styles. Additional tests show that individual auditor style effects explain the variation in (opportunistic) income-increasing accruals, while income-decreasing accruals are explained by office style effects.

English Else
Do Individual Auditors Affect Audit Quality? Evidence from Archival Data

Ferdinand A. Gul,Donghui Wu,Zhifeng Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50536

2013-06-01

The Accounting Review

Abstract:ABSTRACT: We examine whether and how individual auditors affect audit outcomes using a large set of archival Chinese data. We analyze approximately 800 individual auditors and find that they exhibit significant variation in audit quality. The effects that individual auditors have on audit quality are both economically and statistically significant, and are pronounced in both large and small audit firms. We also find that the individual auditor effects on audit quality can be partially explained by auditor characteristics, such as educational background, Big N audit firm experience, rank in the audit firm, and political affiliation. Our findings highlight the importance of scrutinizing and understanding audit quality at the individual auditor level. Data Availability: Data used in this study are publicly available from the sources described herein.

Does the Timing of Auditor Changes Affect Audit Quality? Evidence From the Initial Year of the Audit Engagement

The Effect of the Timing of Auditor Changes on Annual Reporting Lags and Audit Quality

Does Audit Partner Workload Compression Affect Audit Quality?

What are the Drivers of Audit Quality after an Auditor Change? Evidence from Voluntary and Mandatory Auditor Switches

The effect of changing fiscal year-ends on audit fees and audit quality

Till Death Do Us Part: An Examination of the Impact of Unbroken Auditor-Client Relationships on Audit Efficiency and Audit Quality

Can Auditor Change Improve Audit Quality for Listed Firms?From Experience of Repeat Restatement

Anticipation of Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation and Audit Quality

Do Auditors Consider Predecessor Auditors' Credit?——Predecessor Auditors' Audit Quality and Discretionary Accrual

Leader Versus Lagger: How the Timing of Financial Reports Affects Audit Quality and Investment Efficiency

The effects of audit partner pre-client and client-specific experience on audit quality and on perceptions of audit quality

Auditor Changes and Management's Issuance of Earnings Forecasts

THE RELATION BETWEEN ENGAGEMENT QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW HOURS AND AUDITOR CHANGES: EVIDENCE FROM SOUTH KOREA

Audit Firm Change, Initial Audit Fee Discount and Audit Quality

The Effect of Engagement Auditors on Financial Statement Comparability

Auditor Career Concerns, Audit Fees and Audit Quality

Auditor Tenure, Information Asymmetry and Earnings Quality

Auditor tenure and Audit Quality:Empirical Evidence from the Chinese Securities Market

The effect of individual auditor quality on audit outcomes: opening the black box of audit quality

Individual Auditor Style and Audit Quality in a High Reputation Risk Setting

Do Individual Auditors Affect Audit Quality? Evidence from Archival Data