Abstract:This paper investigates the correlation between the quality of corporate social responsibility disclosure (CSRD) and financial performance (FP). It also investigates the moderating role of chief executive officer power (CEOP) in the relationship between the quality of CSR disclosure and firm value (FV) in Chinese listed companies. The evidential research used the up-to-date sample (3, 248) of unbalanced findings for the period of 2014-2020, from the registered Chinese firms in the Shenzhen and Shanghai Stock Exchanges as samples for the study. As a starting point technique, the STATA 15 has been used to test pooled ordinary least squares (OLS) regression on a sample of Chinese listed companies. We use 1-year lagged regression and two SLS regressions to monitor the potential endogeneity problem. The imbalanced data set was received from the China Stock Market and Accounting Research (CSMAR) web page, which is the most significant source of information for Chinese publicly listed firms. Data on CSR information items and media reporting are compiled manually. The findings of the study revealed that there are positive FP consequences for the companies engaged in the quality of CSR disclosure. We also report that higher CEO power negatively enhances the quality of CSR disclosure effect on the FP of FV. The research investigates the impact of CSR disclosure and FP by presenting evidence of the moderating role of CEO power. Therefore, it is suggested that a higher law for CSR engagement and disclosure be implemented in China, and robust measures for the implementation of CEO power, although there are financial advantages to be gained. A key relevance to the empirical quality of CSR disclosure research can be recognized as the moderating role of CEO power in the quality of CSR disclosure, FP, and FV in the context of Chinese study. The findings are robust with the use of an instrumental variable method.

The effect of executives' education and compensation on firm value: evidence from China

Executive Compensation, Firm Performance, and State Ownership in China: Evidence from New Panel Data*

Executive Compensation and Legal Investor Protection: Evidence from China'S Listed Firms

The effect of CEO's compensation in driving corporate ESG greenwashing: Evidence from China

Interactive effects of executive compensation, firm performance and corporate governance: Evidence from an Asian market

The Impact of Unobservable Firm and Manager Characteristics on Executive Compensation——Evidence from listed companies in China

Executive compensation and corporate sustainability: Evidence from ESG ratings

How higher education affects corporate ESG performance: Empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies

Determinants of Executive Compensation: Empirical Research on Listed-Company in China

Managerial Cash Compensation, Government Control and Leverage Choice: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms

Executives' academic experience and corporate social responsibility: A case study in China

Executive Compensation of SOEs and Corporate Social Responsibility: Theory and Evidence from China

A Study on the Compensation Gap among Executives at Chinese Enterprises*

Executives with financial backgrounds and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China

Top executive pay and firm performance in China

The effects of executives with foreign experience on capital structure adjustments toward targets: Evidence from China

Do financial performance and firm's value affect the quality of corporate social responsibility disclosure: Moderating role of chief executive officer's power in China

Do academic executives influence corporate ESG performance? Evidence from China

Empirical examination of the direct and moderating role of corporate social responsibility in top executive compensation

An Empirical Study Of The Effects Of Corporate Performance On Managerial Compensation Based On China'S Listed Companies

From greed to good: how government regulations of executive compensation impact corporate ESG performance?