Abstract:Corporate governance plays an important role in achieving high-quality economic development and sustainable corporate development. In recent years, as listed companies face increasing challenges in social responsibility issues such as environmental pollution and financial fraud, corporate governance has received widespread attention from academics and practitioners. In particular, technological innovation has attracted much attention to the development of enterprises. This paper also explores the intermediary mechanism of technological innovation based on the output measurement method of technological innovation. This study selected data from companies listed on the A-share main board of the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges in China from 2012 to 2022, aiming to explore the relationship between corporate governance and corporate performance. At the same time, we further analyzed the impact of corporate governance on corporate performance based on the mediating role of technological innovation. The research results show that equity balance degree, board size, and executive incentives all have a positive impact on corporate performance. Technological innovation has a certain mediating effect on independent variables (equity balance degree, board size, and executive incentives) and corporate performance. This study clarifies the controversy about the relationship between corporate governance and corporate performance and deepens the understanding of this relationship. It also provides empirical support for listed companies to pay attention to and improve corporate governance levels and enhance innovation capabilities. By exploring the interplay between governance mechanisms, innovation processes, and performance outcomes, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of how organizations can leverage governance practices to drive innovation-led growth and sustainable success.

Public governance and corporate innovation: evidence from a quasi-natural event in China

The Effects of Corporate Governance on Innovation in Chinese Firms ∗

Public Governance and Tunneling: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment in China

The effects of corporate governance and ownership on the innovation performance of Chinese SMEs

Corporate governance and its impact on financial performance and innovation in Chinese‐listed firms

Public environmental attention, media coverage, and corporate green innovation: evidence from heavily polluting industries in China

Government Environmental Information Regulation and Corporate ESG Performance

Geopolitical Risk and Corporate Innovation: Evidence from China

Intellectual property protection and corporate ESG performance: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China

Corporate governance, technological innovation, and corporate performance: Evidence from China

Privatization and Innovation: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experience in China

State‐owned equity participation and corporate green innovation: evidence from Chinese private enterprises

Stock Market Liberalization and Corporate Green Innovation: Evidence from China

How are firms motivated to greenly innovate under the pressure of ESG performance? Evidence from Chinese listed firms

Revealing the Effects of Corporate Governance on Green Investment and Innovation: Do Law and Policy Matter?

Geopolitical Risk and Corporate ESG Performance: Evidence from China

The effects of corporate governance uncertainty on state-owned enterprises' green innovation in China: Perspective from the participation of non-state-owned shareholders

Corporate green innovation behaviour and investment efficiency: evidence from China

Does public data access stimulate the efficiency of corporate green innovation?

State-owned capital and quality of green innovation: Evidence from Chinese listed private firms

Corporate digitalization and green innovation: Evidence from textual analysis of firm annual reports and corporate green patent data in China