Abstract:Despite the massive privatization of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in China, its impact on firm innovation remains poorly understood. Prior literature fails to capture some significant phenomena because it inappropri-ately measures SOE privatization as a dummy variable, which, in actuality, should be measured by "degree ". Using a unique Chinese Patent Census Database (1991-2018) to identify patent quality, we systematically investigated the impact of SOE privatization (as measured by privatization degree) on innovation (as measured by both patent quantity and quality). We found that first, SOE privatization significantly promotes innovation and has greater effects over the long term, mainly through reduced agency costs of firms. Our findings provide empirical support for the ongoing privatization of SOEs in China, and validates the managerial view of SOE theory. Second, unlike previous studies that only considered whether SOEs were privatized or not, we considered the degree of SOE privatization and obtained two novel findings: SOE privatization only promotes innovation when privatized firms are controlled by domestic non-state-owned capital, and progressive privatization benefits innovation more than radical privatization does. These findings reveal the preferred path and rate of SOE pri-vatization. Third, the promotional effects of SOE privatization on innovation are greater for commercial SOEs, central SOEs, large SOEs, and SOEs in high-tech industries compared with their respective counterparts. These findings provide guidance for the different strategies for the privatization of various SOEs.

Privatization and Innovation: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experience in China

The effects of corporate governance and ownership on the innovation performance of Chinese SMEs

Privatization and Innovation: Productivity, New Products, and Patents in China

Initial Public Offering, Corporate Innovation and Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from China

Ultimate Privatization and Change in Firm Performance: Evidence from China

The impact of privatization of state-owned enterprises on innovation in China: A tale of privatization degree

Heterogeneous Blockholders and Enterprise Innovation: Evidence From the Mixed-Ownership Reform in China

Impact of mixed ownership reforms on firm innovation–empirical evidence from China

One novel mixed ownership reform and green innovation in private firms: Evidence from China

Does privatization reform alleviate ownership discrimination? Evidence from the Split-share structure reform in China

Privatization Effect Versus Listing Effect: Evidence from China

Privatization of Soes and Its Innovation Performance: A Reexamination

The effects of state ownership on innovation: evidence from the state-owned enterprises reform in China

Private equity market development, state ownership, and firm innovation: Evidence from China

Does privatization matter for corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China

Stock Market Liberalization and Corporate Green Innovation: Evidence from China

Does mixed-ownership reform improve SOEs' innovation? Evidence from state ownership

How much state ownership is more conducive to corporate innovation in firms? Evidence from China

Decentralization, Strategic Policy Burdens and the SOE Reforms in China – Theory and Evidence

Public-private partnership effect on the company technology innovation-empirical and theory: evidence from China

Stock market liberalization and corporate exploratory innovation: evidence from China