The price is right for artificial meat

Anne Mullen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00629-1
IF: 23.2
2022-10-19
Nature Food
Abstract:The research group collected data from participants in China through the survey platform Wenjuanxing integrated in the WeChat app. Based on descriptors from Mosa Meats and Impossible foods, a control group was provided with a neutral description of artificial meat products, and test groups were provided with either gain-oriented (for example, "compared to the regular meat products, artificial meat products are green, healthy, and nutritious, and significantly improves animal welfares") or avoidance-orientated (for example, "compared to the regular meat products, artificial meat products can avoid environmental destruction, animal slaughter, and food safety problems") messages. Consumers' regulatory focus — a promotion focus that pursues gain and aspiration, or a prevention focus towards vigilance and the avoidance of loss — was characterized, and a double-bound contingent valuation experiment saw consumers presented with random monetary values and asked to bid higher or lower to gauge their willingness to pay for artificial meats.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?