Postmodernism and Historiography
保罗·塔永
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hsp.2005.0036
2006-01-01
Abstract:1 2 Historically Speaking · January/February 2005 Such angstmayresonate forus in our own intellectual and cultural transition. Barbara Herrnstein Smith has described the "bodily distress"—the "impression of inescapable noise or acute disorder, a rush of adrenalin, sensations of alarm, a sense of unbalance or chaos, residual feelings ofnausea and anxiety "—that results from having one's fundamental and hitherto deeply held beliefs challenged .4 So we need not be surprised bysome historians' emotional reactions to the cognitive dissonance to which they are currently exposed. At the very point of realization of the undecidability of the decisions they are required to make, historians are nonetheless compelled to choose, to exercise their freedom and determine for themselves what forms their histories will take. And as they endeavor personally to negotiate the evident chaos of the past, they may, with earlier disciplinary markers now withdrawn, find it hard to see a clear way forward (or backward). Perhaps, however, that very lack ofclarity can be construed as a virtue: blurred edges might better suit our times than those Manichaean-style distinctions—true or false, fact or fiction, good or evil, friend or foe, with us or against—which currently divide the world into dogma-touting partisans. It's their certainty—the fanatical conviction (on both sides) oftheir own lightness—to which history might properly provide some antidote. For where past histories supplied those progressive narratives which led determinedly from dark to light, consolidating an oh-sodesirable present in which we were oh-sohappy to be, what maybe needed now, in our problematic present, are rather histories that investigate alternatives—histories thatquestion the seeming inevitability and necessity of what has come to be accounted natural, necessary, and constitutive of"reality." That brings us back to the question of truth, for however much we question the validity (or even meaningfulness) of such a concept, it seems to be one thatis hard to dispense with altogether. Whether in historical inquiry, or in life more generally, we need perhaps some goal toward which to strive, some fight to which to steer—even ifall the while acknowledging that that end light is always shifting and elusive, never finally attainable. So that our quest, not leastin history , becomes a never-ending process, a journeywithout final destination; and an important function for historical study itselfmight be to clarify and to confirm just that. For history, after all, was originally conceived as an inquiry. And as such, its nature is to be ongoing, ever provoking new visions and fresh appraisals. Indeed, historians might even, like some writers of fiction, resist the allure ofimposing arbitraryclosure and deliberately leave their endings open and their readers with a choice. In thatway theywould at least do more justice to the multiplicity of outcomes known to have been possible. For there is, as Jonathan Clark has recently argued,5 some merit in the consideration of counterfactuals, those paths thatwe declined to take, but could and mighthave taken. It's by viewing such hypothetical alternatives thatwe recognize the contingency of the routes we did choose. It could, in other words, have all been different: historydoesnothave its inbuilt course, however imposed, but has its course determined by human actors. And by seeing that our forbears had a choice, we might, as Clark suggests, be less inclined to see ourselves as caught up in history's seemingly inevitable sweep, and come to recognize our own ability to choose and change our future. Beverley Southgate is reader emeritus in the history ofideas at the University ofHertfordshire . His most recent book is Postmodernism in History: Fear or Freedom? (Routledge, 2003). 1 Leopold von Ranke, "On the Character ofHistorical Science" [ca. 1830], in Georg G. Iggers and Konrad von Moltke, eds., The TheoryandPractice ofHistory (Bobbs-Merrill, 1973), 39. " Lord Acton, Lectures on Modern History [1906] (Fontana, 1960), 27. 3 Joseph Mede, The Works, ed. J. Worthington, 2 vols. (London, n.p., 1664), 1: iii; Richard Ward, The Life ofthe Learned and Pious Dr Henry More (Joseph Downing, 1710), 10-11. 4 Barbara Herrnstein Smith, Beliefand Resistance: Dynamics ofContemporary Intellectual Controversy (Harvard University Press, 1997), xiv. 5 J.C.D. Clark, Our Shadowed Present: Modernism, Postmodernism andHistory (Atlantic Books, 2003). Postmodernism and Historiography...