Abstract:Abstract The conservation of energy and momentum have been viewed as undermining Cartesian mental causation since the 1690s. Modern discussions of the topic tend to use mid-nineteenth century physics, neglecting both locality and Noether’s theorem and its converse. The relevance of General Relativity (GR) has rarely been considered. But a few authors have proposed that the non-localizability of gravitational energy and consequent lack of physically meaningful local conservation laws answers the conservation objection to mental causation: conservation already fails in GR, so there is nothing for minds to violate. This paper is motivated by two ideas. First, one might take seriously the fact that GR formally has an infinity of rigid symmetries of the action and hence, by Noether’s first theorem, an infinity of conserved energies-momenta (thus answering Schrödinger’s 1918 false-negative objection). Second, Sean Carroll has asked (rhetorically) how one should modify the Dirac–Maxwell–Einstein equations to describe mental causation. This paper uses the generalized Bianchi identities to show that General Relativity tends to exclude, not facilitate, such Cartesian mental causation. In the simplest case, Cartesian mental influence must be spatio-temporally constant, and hence 0. The difficulty may diminish for more complicated models. Its persuasiveness is also affected by larger world-view considerations. The new general relativistic objection provides some support for realism about gravitational energy-momentum in GR (taking pseudotensor laws seriously). Such realism also might help to answer an objection to theories of causation involving conserved quantities, because energies-momenta would be conserved even in GR.

The fate of presentism in modern physics

Prospects of relativistic astrophysics: Viewpoints on the most influential journey

A Branching Space-Times Perspective on Presentism

Relativistic Constraints for a Naturalistic Metaphysics of Time

The philosophy of causal set theory

New Difficulties for the Past Hypothesis

History of the NeoClassical Interpretation of Quantum and Relativistic Physics

The Past Hypothesis and the Nature of Physical Laws

Remarks on the relation between physics and faith

Is the end in sight for theoretical pseudophysics?

Kant, Schlick and Friedman on Space, Time and Gravity in Light of Three Lessons from Particle Physics

General Relativity, Mental Causation, and Energy Conservation

Uncertain for A Century: Quantum Mechanics and The Dilemma of Interpretation

Phenomenology, Perspectivalism and (Quantum) Physics

Non-locality and quasiclassical reality in Kent's formulation of relativistic quantum theory

The Paradigm of Projectile Motion and its Consequences for Special Relativity. Making Sense of Physics

Disarming the Ultimate Historical Challenge to Scientific Realism

How do Laws Produce the Future?

Contextual Realism in Physics

C. F. von Weizsaecker's Reconstruction of Physics: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow

The EPR paradox, Bell's inequality, and the question of locality