Surfaces for water-related applications

Michael Nosonovsky
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2051-672X/ab015c
2019-10-07
Abstract:Interaction of water and other liquids with solid surfaces has always been one of the central topics in surface science and tribology. As long as 3900 years ago, an Egyptian painting upon the tomb of Djehutihotep in Dayr al-Barsha shows the transportation of a giant statue with a man pouring liquid in front of the statue. Despite the opinion of some historians that the purpose of pouring might be ceremonial rather than technical, this painting is often considered the earliest example of water lubrication. Applying water lubrication is a typical situation when the effects of wetting and friction combine with one another. Wetting of solid surfaces and capillarity had already been studied by Leonardo da Vinci (1452–1519), Robert Boyle (1627–1691), Johann Leidenfrost (1715–1794) and several other scholars. Some historians of science state that the concept of surface tension was introduced in 1629 by Niccolò Cabeo (1586–1650) in his Philosophia Magnetica , before it was formulated more explicitly in 1751 by Johann Andreas Segner (1704–1777). Surface tension was apparently discussed also in 1638 by Galileo (1564–1642) in his Discourses about Two New Sciences. Galileo was wondering why water droplets formed upon cabbage leaves. The modern understanding of the capillary interactions and the contact angle (CA) was formulated by Thomas Young in 1805 in his essay 'On the Cohesion of Fluids'. The current interest towards wetting and capillarity is stimulated by research of the superhydrophobicity (extreme water repellency due to high CA on some rough or patterned surfaces, also referred to as the Lotus effect). While capillarity and related phenomena such as the Lotus effect constitute an important intersection of the surface science and water technology, there are several other areas where they overlap. Examples are underwater self-cleaning, the shark-skin effect, new types of lubrication, anti-fouling, icephobicity, anti-fogging, novel approaches to filtration, and other effects in tribology and surface science involving liquids interacting with rough solid surfaces. A safe supply of water is increasingly under threat due to global climate change, population growth and environment contamination. Water supply becomes an increasingly important task, which is considered by some politicians a human right. New engineering approaches are needed to solve the current water crisis. The scope of this special issue includes surface phenomena with the potential for water industry applications. The paper by Oka et al [ 1 ] presents new results on the effect of wettability of porous stainless steel and its effect on thermally-induced liquid-vapor interface behavior. These phenomena have important implications for the development of two-phase heat transfer devices such as loop heat pipes. Geraldi et al [ 2 ] investigate an important topic of how the superhydrophobicity is related to the drag redaction during water flow. The authors employed a convenient bi-layered pipe design using a thin superhydrophobic metallic mesh formed into a tube. They showed that the drag coefficient reduces significantly in comparison with uncoated pipes. Ozkan and Erbil [ 3 ] present a fundamentally important study of the interfacial energies, as determined by the CA measured in air, water and oil for the same surfaces. The authors suggest a new concept of 'complementary hysteresis' and find that the values of complementary hysteresis vary almost linearly with the surface free energy of the flat solid samples. The study by Mandsberg and Taborsky [ 4 ] is devoted to another important area related to the superhydrophobicity: the rose petal effect. Unlike the lotus leaf, which has high water CA and low CA hysteresis (i.e., the difference between the CAs, corresponding to the advancing and to the receding liquid), the rose petal surface has both a high CA and high CA hysteresis. This had been considered controversial by some scholars, because a high CA corresponds to hydrophobicity (meaning a lack of affinity to water by a solid surface), while high CA hysteresis implies high adhesion forces between the solid surface and water and thus high affinity to water. However, it was shown that there are different modes or regimes of hydrophobicity. Thus, a high CA may mean weak solid-water adhesion in the direction normal to the interface, while high CA hysteresis implies strong adhesion during tangential loading. This legitimized the 'rose petal effect.' Mandsberg and Taborsky [ 4 ] studied the role of the advancing CA on the rose petal effect. Choi et al [ 5 ] investigated effects related to water penetration into a hydrophobic porous surface. They identified that the receding CA leadin -Abstract Truncated-
What problem does this paper attempt to address?