A unified description of hydrophilic and superhydrophobic surfaces in terms of the wetting and drying transitions of liquids

Robert Evans,Maria C. Stewart,Nigel B. Wilding

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1913587116

2019-10-15

Abstract:Clarifying the factors that control the contact angle of a liquid on a solid substrate is a long-standing scientific problem pertinent across physics, chemistry and materials science. Progress has been hampered by the lack of a comprehensive and unified understanding of the physics of wetting and drying phase transitions. Using various theoretical and simulational techniques applied to realistic fluid models, we elucidate how the character of these transitions depends sensitively on both the range of fluid-fluid and substrate-fluid interactions and the temperature. Our calculations uncover previously unrecognised classes of surface phase diagram which differ from that established for simple lattice models and often assumed to be universal. The differences relate both to the topology of the phase diagram and to the nature of the transitions, with a remarkable feature being a difference between drying and wetting transitions which persists even in the approach to the bulk critical point. Most experimental and simulational studies of liquids at a substrate belong to one of these previously unrecognised classes. We predict that while there appears to be nothing particularly special about water with regard to its wetting and drying behavior, superhydrophobic behavior should be more readily observable in experiments conducted at high temperatures than at room temperature.

Statistical Mechanics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the unified description of the wetting and drying phase transitions of liquids on solid substrates. Specifically, the authors focus on how to elucidate the characteristics of these phase transitions by considering the influence of the fluid - fluid and substrate - fluid interaction ranges as well as temperature. The paper points out that the existing understanding and models (especially research based on simple lattice models) may not be able to comprehensively explain the complex phenomena in real fluids, especially the behavior of super - hydrophobic surfaces. Therefore, the authors' goal is to provide a more comprehensive and accurate theoretical framework to explain the wetting and drying behaviors under different conditions, especially in cases close to complete drying and wetting.

The key issues mentioned in the paper are:
1. **Controlling factors of the contact angle**: How to adjust the contact angle by controlling the interaction between the liquid and the solid substrate, thereby achieving different wetting states (such as partial wetting, partial drying, complete wetting, and complete drying).
2. **Essential differences in wetting and drying phase transitions**: In real - fluid models, there are significant differences in the nature of wetting and drying phase transitions, which are different from the results predicted by simple lattice models.
3. **Influence of the interaction range**: The range of fluid - fluid and substrate - fluid interactions has an important influence on the topological structure of the surface phase diagram and the nature of phase transitions, and this has been overlooked in previous studies.

Through these studies, the authors hope to provide new insights for future theoretical, experimental, and simulation studies, especially in the design and development of materials with specific wetting properties.