Comparison of Response Surface Methodologies and Artificial Neural Network Approaches to Predict the Corrosion Rate of Carbon Steel in Soil

Nguyen Thuy Chung,Soek-Ryul Choi,Jung-Gu Kim,Chung Thuy Nguyen,seokryul Choi,Junggu kim
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ac700d
IF: 3.9
2022-05-17
Journal of The Electrochemical Society
Abstract:Soil corrosion is a critical problem that has recently interested many scientists. Several soil factors affect the corrosion rate of carbon steel, and they can all be relevant at the same time, thus making it difficult to maintain conditions across soil corrosion studies. There are currently two potential methods for predicting corrosion rates in a complex environment such as soils: the response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN). RSM is the method using statistical to design experiment, while ANN predicts the corrosion rate through training based on human brain systems. In this study, these two methods were implemented to predict the corrosion rate of carbon steel considering three factors, such as pH, temperature, and chloride. The prediction of corrosion rate is successful in both methods, and they have their own advantages and disadvantages, thus it must be based on the conditions of laboratory advance to decide between the methods.
electrochemistry,materials science, coatings & films
What problem does this paper attempt to address?