Abstract:Purpose Contemporary organisational landscapes offer opportunities for hybrids to thrive. Public–private partnerships (PPPs) are one thriving hybrid form incorporating the use of resources and/or structures from both public and private sectors. The study examines the impact of such a hybrid structure on governance and accountability mechanisms in a context of institutional complexity. Design/methodology/approach This study uses an approach that draws on institutional logics and hybridity to examine governance arrangements in the PPP policy created for the delivery of UK schools. Unusually, it employs a comparative case study of how four local governments implemented the policy. It draws on a framework developed by Polzer et al. (2017) to examine the level of engagement between multiple logics and hybrid structures and applies this to the delivery of governance and accountability for public money. Findings The Polzer et al. framework enables a study of how the nature of hybrids can vary in terms of their governance, ownership and control relations. The findings show how the relationships between levels of engagement of multiple logics and hybrid structures can impact on governance and accountability for public money. Layering and blending combinations led to increased adoption of private sector accountability structures, whilst a hybrid with parallel co-existence of community and market logics delivered a long-term governance structure. Research limitations/implications The paper examines the operation of hybrids in a complex education PPP environment in only four local governments and therefore cannot provide representative answers across the population as a whole. However, given the considerable variation found across the four examples, the paper shows there can be significant differentiation in how multiple logics engage at different levels and in varying combinations even in the same hybrid setting. The paper focuses on capital investment implementation and its evaluation, so it is a limitation that the operational stage of PPP projects is not studied. Practical implications The findings have political relevance because the two local government bodies with more robust combinations of multiple logics were more successful in getting funds and delivering schools in their geographical areas. Originality/value The study extends Polzer et al. 's (2017) research on hybridity by showing that there can be significant differentiation in how multiple logics engage at different levels and in varying combinations even in what was planned to be the same hybrid setting. It shows how in situations of institutional complexity certain combinations of logics lead to differentiation in governance and accountability, creating fragmented focus on the related public accountability structures. This matters because it becomes harder to hold government to account for public spending.

Social impact bonds and public service reform: back to the future of New Public Management?

Social Impact Bonds as a Funding Method for Health and Social Programs: Potential Areas of Concern.

A Theory of Social Impact Bonds

“Ethical capitalism” in the city: Embedded economy or marketization? The case of social impact bonds

The Aspire Social Impact Bond: How social impact bond financing can promote positive social and economic outcomes

Expanding the Concept of Social Impact Bonds

The razor’s edge: Social impact bonds and the financialization of early childhood services

A systematic literature review on social impact bonds

Productive resistance in public sector innovation – introducing social impact bonds in Swedish local government

The impact of hybridity on PPP governance and related accountability mechanisms: the case of UK education PPPs

Use of social impact bonds in financing health systems responses to non-communicable diseases: scoping review

The New Public Management And A New Accountability

Public sector audit: new public management influences and eco-system driven reforms

Implementing 'Best Value': Local Public Services in Transition

New public management is dead. Long live digital-era governance

Social return on investment in the public sector

Social innovation, social enterprise, and local public services: Undertaking transformation?

‘What You See is All There is’: The Importance of Heuristics in Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) and Social Return on Investment (SROI) in the Evaluation of Public Health Interventions

Increasing public participation and influence in local decision-making to address social determinants of health: a systematic review examining initiatives and theories

Using cost-benefit analysis and social return on investment to evaluate the impact of social enterprise: Promises, implementation, and limitations

The strange resilience of new public management: the case of medical research in the UK’s national health service