Abstract:Objectives To identify how social return on investment (SROI) analysis—traditionally used by business consultants—has been interpreted, used and innovated by academics in the health and social care sector and to assess the quality of peer-reviewed SROI studies in this sector. Design Systematic review. Settings Community and residential settings. Participants A wide range of demographic groups and age groups. Results The following databases were searched: Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, Econlit, Medline, PsychINFO, Embase, Emerald, Social Care Online and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Limited uptake of SROI methodology by academics was found in the health and social care sector. From 868 papers screened, 8 studies met the criteria for inclusion in this systematic review. Study quality was found to be highly variable, ranging from 38% to 90% based on scores from a purpose-designed quality assessment tool. In general, relatively high consistency and clarity was observed in the reporting of the research question, reasons for using this methodology and justifying the need for the study. However, weaknesses were observed in other areas including justifying stakeholders, reporting sample sizes, undertaking sensitivity analysis and reporting unexpected or negative outcomes. Most papers cited links to additional materials to aid in reporting. There was little evidence that academics had innovated or advanced the methodology beyond that outlined in a much-cited SROI guide. Conclusion Academics have thus far been slow to adopt SROI methodology in the evaluation of health and social care interventions, and there is little evidence of innovation and development of the methodology. The word count requirements of peer-reviewed journals may make it difficult for authors to be fully transparent about the details of their studies, potentially impacting the quality of reporting in those studies published in these journals. PROSPERO registration number CRD42018080195.

A systematic literature review on social impact bonds

A Theory of Social Impact Bonds

Social Impact Bonds as a Funding Method for Health and Social Programs: Potential Areas of Concern.

Expanding the Concept of Social Impact Bonds

Social impact bonds and public service reform: back to the future of New Public Management?

The Aspire Social Impact Bond: How social impact bond financing can promote positive social and economic outcomes

Surveying the SIB economy: Social impact bonds, “local” challenges, and shifting markets in urban social problems

Use of social impact bonds in financing health systems responses to non-communicable diseases: scoping review

What is the stock of the situation? A bibliometric analysis on social and environmental accounting research in public sector

Green Bond: A Systematic Literature Review for Future Research Agendas

Social Uncertainty Evaluation of Social Impact Bonds: A Model and Practical Application

The razor’s edge: Social impact bonds and the financialization of early childhood services

Productive resistance in public sector innovation – introducing social impact bonds in Swedish local government

The social return on investment model: a systematic literature review

A state-of-the-art overview of green bond markets: Evidence from technology empowered systematic literature review

Valuing the impact of health and social care programs using social return on investment analysis: how have academics advanced the methodology? A systematic review

Identifying Green Bonds Impact on Company Reputation and Risk

Sustainable bonds as a sustainable financial instrument: thematic insights and future prospects

The journey of participatory budgeting: a systematic literature review and future research directions

A Multidisciplinary Literature Review of Academic Research on the Green Bond Market