Abstract:Procurement and outsourcing are two important topics for many firms.An increased number of companies outsource some of their internal functions to the third party in order to focus on their core competencies and improve their competitive advantage in the market.The popularity of outsourcing is growing,as both successes and failures have been observed in practice.It remains unclear about how the outsourcing decision influences each party's behavior and strategic decisions under different procurement mechanisms. In this paper we model a supply chain system in which a manufacturer purchases multiple components.For each component,there are multiple suppliers capable of providing it.The manufacturer considers outsourcing the procurement of all components to one of his suppliers,rather than purchasing them by himself.Since the production costs are not publicly known,auctions are used to reward the contract.In the first stage,the manufacturer uses the first-price sealed-bid reverse auction to determine which supplier wins the outsourcing contract.Then,the winner of the first auction produces the component that the company is able to provide,and uses reverse auctions to procure the required components from the subset of the suppliers in the first auction. We analyze a supplier's bidding strategies in both stages.In the second period the supplier's bidding strategy is independent of the publicly announced winning price in the first stage.The boundary conditions and differential equations are used to help formulate the supplier's bidding strategies in the first period.The supplier's first-period bidding price for the whole package can be decomposed into expected costs associated with all components.We also compare a manufacturer's total procurement cost when a manufacturer purchases components by itself versus when integral procurement is auctioned.The result shows that the total expected procurement costs are identical under both mechanisms.Furthermore,an explicit solution of bidding strategies for all suppliers can be derived for a special case,where the supplier's cost distributions are uniform.We also provide a numerical example to illustrate the supplier's bidding behavior. These results provide managerial insights for the managers.We show that although outsourcing integral procurement increases the complexity of the bidding strategy for the suppliers,it does not increase the manufacturer's total expected procurement cost.However,the outsourcing strategy can help the manufacturer focus on its core competency.

Procurement Mechanisms with Post-Auction Pre-Award Cost-Reduction Investigations

Simulation-Based Optimization Research on Outsourcing Procurement Cost

Bidding and renegotiation in procurement auctions

Auctioning Supply Contracts

Auction-Based Mechanisms for Electronic Procurement

A Two-stage Equilibrium Bidding Strategy in Outsourcing Procurement of Multiple Components

Using the Six Sigma DMAIC Method to Improve Procurement: A Case Study

The Joint Influence of Quality Assurance and Postponement on a Hybrid Multi-Item Manufacturing-Delivery Decision-Making

Managing Cost Reduction Efforts in Supplier Encroachment

Bidding for Contests

A Public Procurement Combinatorial Auction Mechanism with Quality Assignment

Renegotiations after procurement auctions: Coping with supply disruptions due to underestimating costs

Compound mechanism design of supplier selection based on multi-attribute auction and risk management of supply chain

Multiple-Winner Award Rules in Online Procurement Auctions

Split-Award Auctions: Insights from Theory and Experiments

Dynamic Procurement Management by Reverse Auctions with Fixed Setup Costs and Sales Levers

Balancing procurement cost reduction and supplier satisfaction with genetic algorithm

The Research about the Design and Auction of a Consignment Contract

RFQ, Sequencing, and the Most Favorable Bargaining Outcome

Who Should Invest in Cost Reduction in Supply Chains?