Abstract:The editorial cartoon is a touchstone for matters of free expression in the journalistic tradition. Since their early inception in the politically charged engravings of 18th-century pictorial satirist William Hogarth to the present day, editorial cartoons have shone forth as signifiers of comic irreverence and mockery in the face of governmental authority and in the more generalized cultural politics of the times. In democratic nations they have been cast as a pillar of the fourth estate. Nevertheless, they—and the cartoonists, critics, commentators, and citizens who champion them—have also long stood out as relatively easy targets for concerns about where the lines of issues such libel, slander, defamation, and especially blasphemy should be drawn. This goes for Western-style democracies as well as authoritarian regimes. In other words, the editorial cartoon stands at a critical nexus of meaning and public judgment. At issue from one vantage is what it means to promote the disclosure of folly as the foolish conduct of public officials and the stupidity of institutions that are thereby worthy as objects of ridicule. From another vantage, there is the matter of what it is to deplore the comicality in journalistic opinion-making that goes too far. To approach editorial cartoons from the standpoints of free expression and press freedoms is to verge on conflicting values of civil liberty in and around the so-called right to offend. This was true in the age of Hogarth. It was true in the days of famed French printmaker and caricaturist Honoré Daumier, who was imprisoned for six months from 1832 until 1833 after portraying Emperor Louis-Philippe in the L Caricature . It is also particularly true today in a global media age wherein editorial cartoons, whether or not they are syndicated by official newspapers, can traverse geographic and other boundaries with relative ease and efficiency. Furthermore, the 21st century has seen numerous cartoon controversies vis-à-vis what many commentators have referred to as “cartoon wars,” leading to everything from high-profile firings of cartoonists (including in the United States) through bans and imprisonments of artists in Middle Eastern countries to the 2015 shootings of cartoon artists at the headquarters of French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo . Indeed, if the threshold of the free press is the killed cartoon, the limit point of the freedom of expression is the killed cartoonist. Hence the importance of looking beyond any one editorial cartoon or cartoonist in order to contemplate the comic spirit in certain historical moments so as to discover the social, political, and cultural standards of judgment being applied to the carte blanche of journalism and the comic license of those using graphic caricatures to freely editorialize their takes on the world—or not.

Different systems, similar challenges: humor and free speech in the United States and Europe

The politics and aesthetics of humour in an age of comic controversy

Humor in Satirical News Headlines: Analyzing Humor Form and Content, and Their Relations with Audience Engagement

Masking the Offense? An Ethical View on Humor in Advertising

Categories, Balancing, and Fake News: The Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights

Gender, formal organizational status and humor use: perceptions of social acceptance

How humour travels in the new and dynamic mediascape: a case study of a short video platform, Little Red Book, and an online teaching platform, Rain Classroom

Freedom of Expression and its Restrictions in Europe : On the Applicability of Article 17 of the European Convention of Human Rights to Disinformation (Fake News)

A plea for caution: violent video games, the Supreme Court, and the role of science

Loud, Proud, and All Around Hilarious: Queer Humor in Contemporary Graphic Novels as a Method of Interpersonal Affirmation and Awareness

A Sociologist Walks into a Bar (and Other Academic Challenges): Towards a Methodology of Humour

The European Court of Justice as a Constitutional Court. Legal Reasoning in a Comparative Perspective

Trademark Protection Versus Parodic Use in Commerce: A Comparative Analysis of the US Approach Post Jack Daniel’s Properties v. VIP Products and the German Likelihood of Confusion Analysis

Folly in the Fourth Estate: Editorial Cartoons and Conflicting Values in Global Media Culture

Gender Roles and Humor in Advertising: The Occurrence of Stereotyping in Humorous and Nonhumorous Advertising and Its Consequences for Advertising Effectiveness

Comedy as dissonant rhetoric

The Danish Cartoons, Charlie Hebdo and the culture wars: satiric limits in comparative national and transnational perspectives

The transatlantic divide: intermediary liability, free expression, and the limits of trade harmonization

A general mechanism of humor: reformulating the semantic overlap

The Emoji Factor: Humanizing the Emerging Law of Digital Speech

Cultural Differences in Humor Perception, Usage, and Implications