Preterm birth and maternal smoking: risks related to gestational age and onset of delivery.

N. Kyrklund-Blomberg,S. Cnattingius

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70214-5

IF: 9.8

1998-10-01

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

From Research Conclusions to Real Change: Understanding the First Amendment's (Non)Response to the Negative Effects of Media on Children by Looking to the Example of Violent Video Game Regulations

Renee Newman Knake

Abstract:Through the careful examination of a case taken up by the U.S. Supreme Court during the 2010 Term, Schwarzenegger v. Entertainment Merchants Ass'n, this article assesses a new perspective on the issue of regulating children's access to mass media. The dominant influence of mass media on children is recognized by experts across many disciplines, including child development, communication theory, psychology, sociology, and medicine. Numerous studies demonstrate potential harm to children from exposure to mass media and marketing sources. Nevertheless, courts have been reluctant to recognize such consequences, primarily on the basis of First Amendment and free speech concerns. Indeed, in a significant line of cases the courts have invalidated every legislative effort to regulate children's access to violent video games. This legal reluctance presents a major barrier to the real world application of and benefit from research conclusions regarding the impact of media violence and consumer culture on children. While research of this nature has supported attempts at industry self-regulation or voluntary compliance with ethical guidelines, such efforts have achieved little success. The disconnect between law and social science has led scholars like Professor Barbara Bennett Woodhouse to propose a reframing of the issues. She calls for a paradigm shift from family law's traditional approach of the parent-child-state triangle to recognize the influence of what she terms "mass-media marketing." She proposes a new "child-centered approach to environmental ethics," or in her words "ecogenerism," and suggests that those who advocate for protection of children from the harms of mass media and marketing have much to learn from the environmental law and ethics movement. Woodhouse's proposal offers an appealing perspective for those who support regulation of children's access to harmful media. The real issue, however, is whether ecogenerism will evolve from academic theory to actual practice. This article tests her theory by revisiting the line of violent video game cases to evaluate whether her ecogenerist perspective can achieve any real change in the courts' decisions. Particular attention is devoted to challenges presented by First Amendment free speech protections with a primary focus on the Ninth Circuit's decision in Schwarzenegger to invalidate a California statute prohibiting the sale or rental of violent video games to minors, a case that the Supreme Court is poised to soon decide. While some speculate that the Supreme Court is unlikely to reverse the Ninth Circuit's decision given the uniform position of other courts on this issue, this article reveals that an ecogenerist perspective demands a reversal by the Court precisely for that reason. Should the Court affirm the Ninth Circuit's invalidation of the statute, the article concludes by proposing recommendations for future research and regulatory efforts from an ecogenerist perspective.
“Why Are Video Games So Special?”: The Supreme Court and the Case Against Medium Specificity

Jedd Hakimi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412019857982

IF: 2.18

2019-06-27

Games and Culture

Abstract:The 2011 U.S. Supreme Court case Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association adjudicated the State of California’s right to regulate the sale of “violent” video games and, in the process, effectively considered how video games should be apprehended as a cultural form under the law. The court’s decision cited the missteps of judicial film censorship in protecting video games as a form of expression under the First Amendment, placing video games into a cultural time line of expressive forms. Some media scholars contest the court’s approach for overvaluing the cultural aspects of video games and neglecting their distinct digital materiality. However, a close reading of the case and the circumstances that led the justices’ opinions helps articulate a crucial critique of overly materialist approaches to video games associated with media archaeology. The case details reflect the inextricability of materiality and experience in considering video games as a form of expression.

communication,cultural studies
Plasma Protein Binding and Erythrocyte Partitioning of Nicardipine In Vitro

S. Urien,E. Albengres,A. Comte,J. Kiechel,J. Tillement

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005344-198509000-00012

IF: 3.271

1985-09-01

Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology

Abstract:Summary: Using isotope techniques, equilibrium dialysis, and incubation experiments, we characterized the binding of nicardipine to isolated plasma proteins, human serum, blood cells, and platelets. Nicardipine was mainly bound to lipoproteins, orosomucoïd, albumin, and erythrocytes in human blood. Nicardipine, pindolol, and imipramine were found to share the same site on orosomucoïd. The determinants of nicardipine binding to lipoproteins were triglycerides, phospholipids, and cholesterol ester. Nicardipine partitioned into erythrocytes, showing a constant ratio of distribution between the intra- and extracellular compartments. Nicardipine partitioned less to erythrocytes when increasing amounts of binding plasma proteins were present in the extracellular compartment. In human blood, 12 to 18% of total nicardipine was present in erythrocytes. The overall binding of nicardipine in serum varied from 98 to 99.5% and correlated with serum orosomucoïd and serum lipid concentrations.
Blazing Angels or Resident Evil? Can Violent Video Games be a Force for Good?

Christopher J. Ferguson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018941

IF: 4.615

2010-06-01

Review of General Psychology

Abstract:Violent video games have been a source of controversy in the United States and elsewhere for several decades. Considerable concern has been raised in the public and scientific communities about the alleged deleterious effects of violent games. These concerns may coincide with periodic moral panics about media's influence, particularly on youth. This paper argues that the negative effects of violent games have been exaggerated by some elements of the scientific community, fitting with past cycles of media-focused moral panics. By contrast, potential positive effects of violent video game play have been ignored in the debate on violent games. The current paper considers research in several areas, including aggression, but also the nascent research fields of visuospatial cognition, social networking, and use as educational tools. It is argued that the debate on video game violence should be broadened to include both potential negative and positive effects.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Screen Violence and Youth Behavior.

Craig A. Anderson,Brad J. Bushman,Bruce D. Bartholow,Joanne Cantor,Dimitri Christakis,Sarah M. Coyne,Edward Donnerstein,Jeanne Funk Brockmyer,Douglas A. Gentile,C. Shawn Green,Rowell Huesmann,Tom Hummer,Barbara Krahé,Victor C. Strasburger,Wayne Warburton,Barbara J. Wilson,Michele Ybarra,Victor C Strasburger,Craig A Anderson,Barbara J Wilson,Sarah M Coyne,Douglas A Gentile,C Shawn Green,Brad J Bushman,Bruce D Bartholow

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1758T

2019-10-03

PEDIATRICS

Abstract:Violence in screen entertainment media (ie, television, film, video games, and the Internet), defined as depictions of characters (or players) trying to physically harm other characters (or players), is ubiquitous. The Workgroup on Media Violence and Violent Video Games reviewed numerous meta-analyses and other relevant research from the past 60 years, with an emphasis on violent video game research. Consistent with every major science organization review, the Workgroup found compelling evidence of short-term harmful effects, as well as evidence of long-term harmful effects. The vast majority of laboratory-based experimental studies have revealed that violent media exposure causes increased aggressive thoughts, angry feelings, physiologic arousal, hostile appraisals, aggressive behavior, and desensitization to violence and decreases prosocial behavior (eg, helping others) and empathy. Still, to more fully understand the potential for long-term harm from media violence exposure, the field is greatly in need of additional large-sample, high-quality, longitudinal studies that include validated measures of media violence exposure and measures of other known violence risk factors. Also, although several high-quality media violence intervention studies have been conducted, larger-scale studies with more comprehensive and longer-term assessments are needed to fully understand long-term effects and to inform the development of tools that will help to reduce problems associated with aggression and violence. The evidence that violent screen media constitutes a causal risk factor for increased aggression is compelling. Modern social-cognitive theories of social behavior provide useful frameworks for understanding how and why these effects occur.

pediatrics
Implementation and performance modeling of deterministic particle transport (Sweep3D) on the IBM Cell/B.E

O. Lubeck,M. Lang,R. Srinivasan,Greg Johnson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/SPR-2009-0266

Scientific Programming

Abstract:The IBM Cell Broadband Engine (BE) is a novel multi-core chip with the potential for the demanding floating point performance that is required for high-fidelity scientific simulations. However, data movement within the chip can be a major challenge to realizing the benefits of the peak floating point rates. In this paper, we present the results of implementing Sweep3D on the Cell/B.E. using an intra-chip message passing model that minimizes data movement. We compare the advantages/disadvantages of this programming model with a previous implementation using a master–worker threading strategy. We apply a previously validated micro-architecture performance model for the application executing on the Cell/B.E. (based on our previous work in Monte Carlo performance models), that predicts overall CPI (cycles per instruction), and gives a detailed breakdown of processor stalls. Finally, we use the micro-architecture model to assess the performance of future design parameters for the Cell/B.E. micro-architecture. The methodologies and results have broader implications that extend to multi-core architectures.
Goals and learning in microworlds

Craig S. Miller,J. Lehman,K. Koedinger

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2303_2

1999-07-01

Abstract:We explored the consequences for learning through interaction with an educational microworld called Electric Field Hockey (EFH). Like many microworlds, EFH is intended to help students develop a qualitative understanding of the target domain, in this case, the physics of electrical interactions. Through the development and use of a computer model that learns to play EFH, we analyzed the knowledge the model acquired as it applied the game-oriented strategies we observed physics students using. Through learning-by-doing on the standard sequence of tasks, the model substantially improved its EFH playing ability; however, it did so without acquiring any new qualitative physics knowledge. This surprising result led to an experiment that compared students’ use of EFH with standard-goal tasks against two alternative instructional conditions, specific-path and no-goal, each justified from a different learning theory. Students in the standard-goal condition learned less qualitative physics than did those in the two alternative conditions, which was consistent with the model. The implication for instructional practice is that careful selection and analysis of the tasks that frame microworld use is essential if these programs are to lead to the learning outcomes imagined for them. Theoretically, these results suggest a new interpretation for numerous empirical findings on the effectiveness of no-goal instructional tasks. The standing ‘‘reduced cognitive load’’ interpretation is contradicted by the success of the specific-path condition, and we offer an alternative knowledge-dependent interpretation.
A Judicial Teaching Point: The Lesson of the Late Justice John Paul Stevens in Sony V. Universal City Studios as a Response to Civil Lawfare

Mark W. Smith

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3537379

2019-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Gun-control proponents, unable to enact their favored gun control measures via democratic means, often engage in lawfare against gun manufacturers and distributors — i.e., warfare by means of litigation and other legal processes, designed to penalize financially such businesses with a view toward putting them out of business altogether. Courts presiding over these cases should take a lesson from the late Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens. He authored the 1984 decision in Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417 ( the “Betamax” case), in which movie production companies tried to use the courts — and not the legislature — to outlaw the selling of video cassette records, or VCRs, on the grounds that they could be used by criminals to infringe upon the studios’ copyrights. The Supreme Court’s ruling in that case, which refused to hold sellers of VCRs liable for the harms caused by third-party misuse of the product, is equally applicable to manufacturers of firearms that some seek to ban. Just as VCRs were widely and predominantly used for legitimate, unobjectionable purposes in the 1980s and 1990s, the same can be said for firearms today. Justice Stevens, who decades later advocated for the repeal of the Second Amendment, sat in the same seat as today’s judges before whom warfare against the gun industry is currently being waged. But when the studios sought to accomplish through the courts what they could not accomplish through the legislature (the imposition of financially devasting legal liability arising from the conduct of unaffiliated third parties), Justice Stevens and our highest court said, “No.” In 2005, Congress passed the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (“PLCAA”), which was inspired by the same sentiment implicit in the Justice Stevens’s Betamax ruling, i.e., the desire to stem the tide of liability suits against gunmakers and sellers for the criminal misuse of guns by individuals over whom the gun manufacturers had no control or relationship. Recently, litigants have tried (with some success) to exploit loopholes in the PLCAA. Such lawsuits are not necessarily meant to win in court. They are often motivated partially, if not entirely, by political desires to rid American society of gun manufacturers by intentionally and effectively driving them out of business due to the onerous cost of civil lawfare. If successful, the gun control lobby will have succeeded in accomplishing through the courts something that they were unable to accomplish in the legislative or political sphere: eliminating the manufacture and sale of firearms in the United States.The Betamax decision represents an important — but, until now, mostly overlooked — judicial teaching moment. Justice Stevens’ reasoning and the language and purpose of the PLCAA should be considered by today’s courts when deciding lawsuits against the gun industry for harms caused by criminal third parties.
Parents rate the ratings: a test of the validity of the American movie, television, and video game ratings

D A Walsh,D A Gentile,T M Van Brederode

Abstract:Background: Numerous studies have documented the potential effects on young audiences of violent content in media products, including movies, television programs, and computer and video games. Similar studies have evaluated the effects associated with sexual content and messages. Cumulatively, these effects represent a significant public health risk for increased aggressive and violent behavior, spread of sexually transmitted diseases, and pediatric pregnancy. In partial response to these risks and to public and legislative pressure, the movie, television, and gaming industries have implemented ratings systems intended to provide information about the content and appropriate audiences for different films, shows, and games. Methods: We conducted a panel study to test the validity of the current movie, television, and video game rating systems. Participants used the KidScore media evaluation tool, which evaluates films, television shows, and video and computer games on 10 aspects, including the appropriateness of the media product for children on the basis of age. Results: Results revealed that when an entertainment industry rates a product as inappropriate for children, parent raters agree that it is inappropriate for children. However, parent raters disagree with industry usage of many of the ratings designating material suitable for children of different ages. Products rated as appropriate for adolescents are of the greatest concern. The level of disagreement varies from industry to industry and even from rating to rating. Conclusions: Analysis indicates that the amount of violent content and portrayals of violence are the primary markers for disagreement between parent raters and industry ratings. Short-term and long-term recommendations are suggested.
Effects of Violent Video Games on Aggressive Behavior, Aggressive Cognition, Aggressive Affect, Physiological Arousal, and Prosocial Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Scientific Literature

Craig A. Anderson,Brad J. Bushman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00366

IF: 10.172

2001-09-01

Psychological Science

Abstract:Research on exposure to television and movie violence suggests that playing violent video games will increase aggressive behavior. A meta-analytic review of the video-game research literature reveals that violent video games increase aggressive behavior in children and young adults. Experimental and nonexperimental studies with males and females in laboratory and field settings support this conclusion. Analyses also reveal that exposure to violent video games increases physiological arousal and aggression-related thoughts and feelings. Playing violent video games also decreases prosocial behavior.

psychology, multidisciplinary
The Influence of Media Violence on Youth

Craig A. Anderson,Leonard Berkowitz,Edward Donnerstein,L. Rowell Huesmann,James D. Johnson,Daniel Linz,Neil M. Malamuth,Ellen Wartella

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2003.pspi_1433.x

2003-12-01

Psychological Science in the Public Interest

Abstract:Research on violent television and films, video games, and music reveals unequivocal evidence that media violence increases the likelihood of aggressive and violent behavior in both immediate and long-term contexts. The effects appear larger for milder than for more severe forms of aggression, but the effects on severe forms of violence are also substantial ( r = .13 to .32) when compared with effects of other violence risk factors or medical effects deemed important by the medical community (e.g., effect of aspirin on heart attacks). The research base is large; diverse in methods, samples, and media genres; and consistent in overall findings. The evidence is clearest within the most extensively researched domain, television and film violence. The growing body of video-game research yields essentially the same conclusions. Short-term exposure increases the likelihood of physically and verbally aggressive behavior, aggressive thoughts, and aggressive emotions. Recent large-scale longitudinal studies provide converging evidence linking frequent exposure to violent media in childhood with aggression later in life, including physical assaults and spouse abuse. Because extremely violent criminal behaviors (e.g., forcible rape, aggravated assault, homicide) are rare, new longitudinal studies with larger samples are needed to estimate accurately how much habitual childhood exposure to media violence increases the risk for extreme violence. Well-supported theory delineates why and when exposure to media violence increases aggression and violence. Media violence produces short-term increases by priming existing aggressive scripts and cognitions, increasing physiological arousal, and triggering an automatic tendency to imitate observed behaviors. Media violence produces long-term effects via several types of learning processes leading to the acquisition of lasting (and automatically accessible) aggressive scripts, interpretational schemas, and aggression-supporting beliefs about social behavior, and by reducing individuals' normal negative emotional responses to violence (i.e., desensitization). Certain characteristics of viewers (e.g., identification with aggressive characters), social environments (e.g., parental influences), and media content (e.g., attractiveness of the perpetrator) can influence the degree to which media violence affects aggression, but there are some inconsistencies in research results. This research also suggests some avenues for preventive intervention (e.g., parental supervision, interpretation, and control of children's media use). However, extant research on moderators suggests that no one is wholly immune to the effects of media violence. Recent surveys reveal an extensive presence of violence in modern media. Furthermore, many children and youth spend an inordinate amount of time consuming violent media. Although it is clear that reducing exposure to media violence will reduce aggression and violence, it is less clear what sorts of interventions will produce a reduction in exposure. The sparse research literature suggests that counterattitudinal and parental-mediation interventions are likely to yield beneficial effects, but that media literacy interventions by themselves are unsuccessful. Though the scientific debate over whether media violence increases aggression and violence is essentially over, several critical tasks remain. Additional laboratory and field studies are needed for a better understanding of underlying psychological processes, which eventually should lead to more effective interventions. Large-scale longitudinal studies would help specify the magnitude of media-violence effects on the most severe types of violence. Meeting the larger societal challenge of providing children and youth with a much healthier media diet may prove to be more difficult and costly, especially if the scientific, news, public policy, and entertainment communities fail to educate the general public about the real risks of media-violence exposure to children and youth.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Projected Health Outcomes Associated With 3 US Supreme Court Decisions in 2022 on COVID-19 Workplace Protections, Handgun-Carry Restrictions, and Abortion Rights

Adam Gaffney,David U Himmelstein,Samuel Dickman,Caitlin Myers,David Hemenway,Danny McCormick,Steffie Woolhandler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.15578

2023-06-01

Abstract:Importance: Several recent US Supreme Court rulings have drawn criticism from the medical community, but their health consequences have not been quantitatively evaluated. Objective: To model health outcomes associated with 3 Supreme Court rulings in 2022 that invalidated workplace COVID-19 vaccine or mask-and-test requirements, voided state handgun-carry restrictions, and revoked the constitutional right to abortion. Design, setting, and participants: This decision analytical modeling study estimated outcomes associated with 3 Supreme Court rulings in 2022: (1) National Federation of Independent Business v Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), which invalidated COVID-19 workplace protections; (2) New York State Rifle and Pistol Association Inc v Bruen, Superintendent of New York State Police (Bruen), which voided state laws restricting handgun carry; and (3) Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization (Dobbs), which revoked the constitutional right to abortion. Data analysis was performed from July 1, 2022, to April 7, 2023. Main outcomes and measures: For the OSHA ruling, multiple data sources were used to calculate deaths attributable to COVID-19 among unvaccinated workers from January 4 to May 28, 2022, and the share of these deaths that would have been prevented by the voided protections. To model the Bruen decision, published estimates of the consequences of right-to-carry laws were applied to 2020 firearm-related deaths (and injuries) in 7 affected jurisdictions. For the Dobbs ruling, the model assessed unwanted pregnancy continuations, resulting from the change in distance to the closest abortion facility, and then excess deaths (and peripartum complications) from forcing these unwanted pregnancies to term. Results: The decision model projected that the OSHA decision was associated with 1402 additional COVID-19 deaths (and 22 830 hospitalizations) in early 2022. In addition, the model projected that 152 additional firearm-related deaths (and 377 nonfatal injuries) annually will result from the Bruen decision. Finally, the model projected that 30 440 fewer abortions will occur annually due to current abortion bans stemming from Dobbs, with 76 612 fewer abortions if states at high risk for such bans also were to ban the procedure; these bans will be associated with an estimated 6 to 15 additional pregnancy-related deaths each year, respectively, and hundreds of additional cases of peripartum morbidity. Conclusions and relevance: These findings suggest that outcomes from 3 Supreme Court decisions in 2022 could lead to substantial harms to public health, including nearly 3000 excess deaths (and possibly many more) over a decade.
A review of Australian classification practices for commercial video games featuring simulated gambling

Daniel L. King,Paul H. Delfabbro,Jeffrey L. Derevensky,Mark D. Griffiths

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2012.661444

2012-08-01

International Gambling Studies

Abstract:This paper reviews Australian classification practices for commercial video games that contain simulated gambling. In the last decade, over 100 video games featuring gambling simulations have been classified as suitable for commercial sale to youth in Australia, with 69 of these video games rated ‘PG’ for Parental Guidance Recommended (i.e. suitable for ages 8+years) and the remaining 33 rated ‘G’ for General (i.e. suitable for all ages). A review of the literature suggests that consumer advice and warnings related to video game material are often inconsistent and/or not adequately provided. A public health approach suggests that the presence of gambling content in video games may present risks to younger players unfamiliar with how gambling operates. It is argued that there is a need for further academic debate on social responsibility issues of early childhood and adolescent exposure to, and involvement in, simulated gambling activities available in interactive gaming technologies.

substance abuse
Violence in E-rated video games

K M Thompson,K Haninger

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.5.591

IF: 11.816

2001-08-01

JAMA

Abstract:Context: Children's exposure to violence, alcohol, tobacco and other substances, and sexual messages in the media are a source of public health concern; however, content in video games commonly played by children has not been quantified. Objectives: To quantify and characterize the depiction of violence, alcohol, tobacco and other substances, and sex in video games rated E (for "Everyone"), analogous to the G rating of films, which suggests suitability for all audiences. Design: We created a database of all existing E-rated video games available for rent or sale in the United States by April 1, 2001, to identify the distribution of games by genre and to characterize the distribution of content descriptors associated with these games. We played and assessed the content of a convenience sample of 55 E-rated video games released for major home video game consoles between 1985 and 2000. Main outcome measures: Game genre; duration of violence; number of fatalities; types of weapons used; whether injuring characters or destroying objects is rewarded or is required to advance in the game; depiction of alcohol, tobacco and other substances; and sexual content. Results: Based on analysis of the 672 current E-rated video games played on home consoles, 77% were in sports, racing, or action genres and 57% did not receive any content descriptors. We found that 35 of the 55 games we played (64%) involved intentional violence for an average of 30.7% of game play (range, 1.5%-91.2%), and we noted significant differences in the amount of violence among game genres. Injuring characters was rewarded or required for advancement in 33 games (60%). The presence of any content descriptor for violence (n = 23 games) was significantly correlated with the presence of intentional violence in the game (at a 5% significance level based on a 2-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, t(53) = 2.59). Notably, 14 of 32 games (44%) that did not receive a content descriptor for violence contained acts of violence. Action and shooting games led to the largest numbers of deaths from violent acts, and we found a significant correlation between the proportion of violent game play and the number of deaths per minute of play. We noted potentially objectionable sexual content in 2 games and the presence of alcohol in 1 game. Conclusions: Content analysis suggests a significant amount of violence in some E-rated video games. The content descriptors provide some information to parents and should be used along with the rating, but the game's genre also appears to play a role in the amount of violent play. Physicians and parents should understand that popular E-rated video games may be a source of exposure to violence and other unexpected content for children and that games may reward the players for violent actions.
Effects of Viewing Violent Electronic Products on Children’s Psychological Development

Xinran Ma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54097/rj0z5236

2024-03-02

Abstract:Many years of research have shown that media exposure and violent TV shows are two dangerous factors that might lead to aggressive behavior in kids. Because television was the most common media that youngsters were exposed to, electronic gadgets were selected for the study. Violence is on the rise and fresh cartoons are produced by the media on a regular basis. As science and technology advance, children are interacting with technological products like animated movies more and more. In order to ascertain the impact of violent TV programs on children's psychological development—specifically, violence, prosocial conduct, social adjustment, and peer relationships—this study analyzes the body of research on the subject. Moreover, the progress of science and technology has brought children closer and closer to electronic products such as movie animation, and we need to study the impact of these increasing things on children in order to better nurture future human beings. Giving guidance to various groups of people at the end of the paper. The purpose of this article is to reveal the harmfulness of violent media and television programs to children and to warn people in order to better protect the designated population in the future.
Do Cultural Values Matter? A Cross-Cultural Study of the Third-Person Effect and Support for the Regulation of Violent Video Games

Seong Choul Hong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022115588950

2015-06-01

Abstract:This article aims to extend third-person effect research into a cross-cultural context. How and why the third-person perception (perceptual gaps between media effect on self and others) has dissimilar association with the willingness to support regulation of media content in the United States and South Korea is investigated. The survey results demonstrate a larger third-person perception among U.S. respondents than among Korean respondents. Regression and mediation analyses reveal that the different levels of third-person perception mainly result from the direct influence of nationality, while cultural values were not statistically significant in accounting for the third-person perception. In contrast, Koreans show a greater level of support for the censorship of violent video games than Americans. The national difference in behavioral intention is the direct effect of nationality on the intention to support regulation and by the indirect effect of cultural values such as collectivism. In addition, gender, age, religiosity, negative prejudice against violent video games, collectivism, and the presumption of media effects on others contributed to support for preemptive behavioral measures such as censorship. However, more frequent playing of violent video games decreases support for regulation. In addition, the implications for research on third-person perception and the intention to support media content regulation are discussed.

psychology, social
Finding Common Ground in Meta-Analysis “Wars” on Violent Video Games

Maya B. Mathur,Tyler J. VanderWeele

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850104

2019-06-12

Perspectives on Psychological Science

Abstract:Independent meta-analyses on the same topic can sometimes yield seemingly conflicting results. For example, prominent meta-analyses assessing the effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior have reached apparently different conclusions, provoking ongoing debate. We suggest that such conflicts are sometimes partly an artifact of reporting practices for meta-analyses that focus only on the pooled point estimate and its statistical significance. Considering statistics that focus on the distributions of effect sizes and that adequately characterize effect heterogeneity can sometimes indicate reasonable consensus between “warring” meta-analyses. Using novel analyses, we show that this seems to be the case in the video-game literature. Despite seemingly conflicting results for the statistical significance of the pooled estimates in different meta-analyses of video-game studies, all of the meta-analyses do in fact point to the conclusion that, in the vast majority of settings, violent video games do increase aggressive behavior but that these effects are almost always quite small.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Violent Video Games Exposed: A Blow by Blow Account of Senseless Violence in Games

Andrew Krantz,Vipul Shukla,Michele Knox,Karyssa Schrouder

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2016.1226744

2017-01-02

Abstract:Violent video game (VVG) use has repeatedly been found to be associated with hostile expectations about others, desensitization to violence, decreased empathy and prosocial behavior, and aggressive thoughts and behaviors. Although these research findings have been widely publicized, VVGs remain the most extensively played games and represent a multi-billion dollar industry. Although VVGs are typically rated "mature," indicating they are not suitable for youths, they are often purchased for youths. This may be in part because there is currently no system available to consumers that thoroughly describes the content of video games, and much of the public is unaware of the types of violence that characterize game play. The purpose of this paper is to describe the violent content of some of the top VVGs, based on sales. For the purposes of this issue, acts of senseless, unprovoked violence will be described in detail.
A Legislative/Legal History of Prescription Drug Advertising and Promotion Regulation

Stephen Li,Iris Gibbs

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18433/jpps32138

Abstract:Purpose: The communication by pharmaceutical companies of promotional messages about their products has long been controversial, but deemed to be necessary by the pharmaceutical industry so that health care professionals and in some cases patients/consumers can be made aware of the latest developments through the communication vehicles they are accustomed to seeing - in the case of health care professionals, through medical advertising, direct mail, visits by company representatives, and attendance at medical meetings, and in case of patients, through the news media and television advertising. On the other hand, critics argue that such promotion, which sometimes reduces complex medical issues to advertising slogans, is inappropriate for products intended to treat and cure diseases, and that health care professionals should learn about new products from peer-reviewed medical literature. Consequently, advertising, and promotional programs are heavily regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). However, the laws themselves raise constitutional issues of infringement on free speech. Over the past few years, a number of lawsuits have been decided that help clarify the role of the FDA and the extent of its authority in regulating what companies or their employees say about their products. These court decisions are important because they help define how health care professionals and patients/consumers receive medical information. Methods: This overview is intended to identify, in non-technical language, some of the more controversial and challenging issues involved in the FDA's efforts to regulate marketing communications by drug companies and how the courts view them. Results: The recent lawsuits often involve complex and far-reaching legal issues. But when examined in toto, as this paper does, they have reflected a view by the courts that truthful and non-misleading statements by drug companies about their products can be legally communicated even when the medical information is not formally approved by the FDA and included in the FDA-approved labeling. The lawsuits thus have led to an environment in which the FDA continues to oversee with great fervor the activities of drug companies in communicating medical information but at the same time having some flexibility in keeping health care professionals and patients up to date with th latest information about medical research and new therapeutic products. Conclusion: How pharmaceutical products are marketed has been deemed by the U.S. Congress to be important enough to need to be subject to federal regulation. The issues create a tension between the need for medical information to be accurate and balanced, and the guarantees of free speech. This review provides an important perspective on how this tension is being resolved, even as dramatic advances in both medical products and technology create new challenges.
The impact of electronic media violence: scientific theory and research

L Rowell Huesmann

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.09.005

Abstract:Since the early 1960s, research evidence has been accumulating that suggests that exposure to violence in television, movies, video games, cell phones, and on the Internet increases the risk of violent behavior on the viewer's part, just as growing up in an environment filled with real violence increases the risk of them behaving violently. In the current review this research evidence is critically assessed and the psychological theory that explains why exposure to violence has detrimental effects for both the short and long-term is elaborated. Finally the size of the "media violence effect" is compared with some other well-known threats to society to estimate how important a threat it should be considered.

Preterm birth and maternal smoking: risks related to gestational age and onset of delivery.

From Research Conclusions to Real Change: Understanding the First Amendment's (Non)Response to the Negative Effects of Media on Children by Looking to the Example of Violent Video Game Regulations

“Why Are Video Games So Special?”: The Supreme Court and the Case Against Medium Specificity

Plasma Protein Binding and Erythrocyte Partitioning of Nicardipine In Vitro

Blazing Angels or Resident Evil? Can Violent Video Games be a Force for Good?

Screen Violence and Youth Behavior.

Implementation and performance modeling of deterministic particle transport (Sweep3D) on the IBM Cell/B.E

Goals and learning in microworlds

A Judicial Teaching Point: The Lesson of the Late Justice John Paul Stevens in Sony V. Universal City Studios as a Response to Civil Lawfare

Parents rate the ratings: a test of the validity of the American movie, television, and video game ratings

Effects of Violent Video Games on Aggressive Behavior, Aggressive Cognition, Aggressive Affect, Physiological Arousal, and Prosocial Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Scientific Literature

The Influence of Media Violence on Youth

Projected Health Outcomes Associated With 3 US Supreme Court Decisions in 2022 on COVID-19 Workplace Protections, Handgun-Carry Restrictions, and Abortion Rights

A review of Australian classification practices for commercial video games featuring simulated gambling

Violence in E-rated video games

Effects of Viewing Violent Electronic Products on Children’s Psychological Development

Do Cultural Values Matter? A Cross-Cultural Study of the Third-Person Effect and Support for the Regulation of Violent Video Games

Finding Common Ground in Meta-Analysis “Wars” on Violent Video Games

Violent Video Games Exposed: A Blow by Blow Account of Senseless Violence in Games

A Legislative/Legal History of Prescription Drug Advertising and Promotion Regulation

The impact of electronic media violence: scientific theory and research