Abstract:When it is recognized that laboratory studies of learned helplessness with huma n subjects are basically studies of experimenter-induced failure, the relevance of numerous previous studies of failure induction and of the theoretical models that generated them becomes apparent. The present study adopted the assump tion that cognitive interference associated wit h anxiety is the source of the performance decrement s observe d i n helplessness studies . For susceptibl e subjects, failure experiences elicit a task-irrelevant, negative focus on self. As predicted from such a model, attentional redeployment in the form of an imagin ation exercise eliminated the impairment o f performance that typically follow s a helplessness induction. However, it was found that the effectiveness of the exercise depended on provision of a rationale to the subjects. As predicted, it was also found that subjects who received the exercise and rationale in the absence of a failure induction became debilitated, although this effect wa s only marginally significant. The results are discussed in terms of a cognitiveattentional interpretation of learned helplessness studies, and the likely role of demand characteristics i s noted. The experimental manipulations typically employed i n learned helplessnes s studie s with human subjects reliably produce impairment of subsequent task performanc e (Abramson, Seligman , & Teasdale, 1978) . However, Buchwald , Coyne , an d Col e (1978) argued that multiple meanings given to the term "learned helplessness" hav e obscured problems in the model's explanation for this impairment. The term has been simultaneously applie d t o (a) any demonstration o f impaired performance by subjects exposed to such a manipulation, (b) the specific underlying cognitive and motivational deficits postulated by the model, and (c ) the hypothetical expectation tha t reinforcement i s not contingen t upon response. Consequently , investigators have

Learned helplessness revisited: biased evaluation of goals and action potential are major risk factors for emotional disturbance

Persistence and disengagement in failing goals: commentary on Boddez, Van Dessel, & De Houwer

Learned helplessness at fifty: Insights from neuroscience.

Learned helplessness as experimenter-induced failure and its alleviation with attentional redeployment.

The Process of Self-Discovery: Learned Helplessness, Self-Efficacy, and Endogenous Overoptimism

Individual differences in naturalistic learning link negative emotionality to the development of anxiety

Lack of optimistic bias during social evaluation learning reflects reduced positive self-beliefs in depression and social anxiety, but via distinct mechanisms

Persistence and Disengagement in Personal Goal Pursuit

The Interactive Effect of Happiness Emotion Goals and Emotion Regulation Self-Efficacy on Anxiety and Depression

From Empathy to Apathy: The Bystander Effect Revisited

The Interactive Effect of Individual Differences in Goal Strength and Self-Discrepancies: Examining Negative Affective Outcomes

In My Grasp or out of My Hands? Belief About Where Life Satisfaction Comes from Predicts Motivation to Seek it

Impact Of Learned Helplessness On Cognitive Performance And Resting-State Connectivity: An fMRI Study

An analysis of learned helplessness: Continuous changes in performance, strategy, and achievement cognitions following failure.

Exploration on Helplessness of Motor Learning Using the Cognitive Mode

Why bother? Death, failure, and fatalistic withdrawal from life.

Assessing the relationship between the human learned helplessness depression model and anhedonia

On psychological growth and vulnerability: Basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle.

Neurocomputational Mechanisms Underlying Maladaptive Self-Belief Formation in Depression

The role of self-blame and worthlessness in the psychopathology of major depressive disorder

A negative emotional and economic judgment bias in major depression