Abstract:Differential privacy (DP), as a rigorous mathematical definition quantifying privacy leakage, has become a well-accepted standard for privacy protection. Combined with powerful machine learning (ML) techniques, differentially private machine learning (DPML) is increasingly important. As the most classic DPML algorithm, DP-SGD incurs a significant loss of utility, which hinders DPML's deployment in practice. Many studies have recently proposed improved algorithms based on DP-SGD to mitigate utility loss. However, these studies are isolated and cannot comprehensively measure the performance of improvements proposed in algorithms. More importantly, there is a lack of comprehensive research to compare improvements in these DPML algorithms across utility, defensive capabilities, and generalizability. We fill this gap by performing a holistic measurement of improved DPML algorithms on utility and defense capability against membership inference attacks (MIAs) on image classification tasks. We first present a taxonomy of where improvements are located in the ML life cycle. Based on our taxonomy, we jointly perform an extensive measurement study of the improved DPML algorithms, over twelve algorithms, four model architectures, four datasets, two attacks, and various privacy budget configurations. We also cover state-of-the-art label differential privacy (Label DP) algorithms in the evaluation. According to our empirical results, DP can effectively defend against MIAs, and sensitivity-bounding techniques such as per-sample gradient clipping play an important role in defense. We also explore some improvements that can maintain model utility and defend against MIAs more effectively. Experiments show that Label DP algorithms achieve less utility loss but are fragile to MIAs. ML practitioners may benefit from these evaluations to select appropriate algorithms. To support our evaluation, we implement a modular re-usable software, DPMLBench,(1) which enables sensitive data owners to deploy DPML algorithms and serves as a benchmark tool for researchers and practitioners.

Utility–Privacy Trade-Off in Distributed Machine Learning Systems

DPMLBench: Holistic Evaluation of Differentially Private Machine Learning

Not one but many Tradeoffs: Privacy Vs. Utility in Differentially Private Machine Learning

Rethinking Improved Privacy-Utility Trade-off with Pre-existing Knowledge for DP Training

Differentially-Private Deep Learning with Directional Noise

DP-LSSGD: A Stochastic Optimization Method to Lift the Utility in Privacy-Preserving ERM

Differential Privacy-preserving Distributed Machine Learning

Data-Driven Optimization for Utility Providers with Differential Privacy of Users' Energy Profile

Evaluating Differentially Private Machine Learning in Practice

Directional Privacy for Deep Learning

The Normal Distributions Indistinguishability Spectrum and its Application to Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning

Differentially-Private Deep Learning from an Optimization Perspective.

Correlated Privacy Mechanisms for Differentially Private Distributed Mean Estimation

When Deep Learning Meets Differential Privacy: Privacy,Security, and More

Optimal Differentially Private Model Training with Public Data

Local Differential Privacy for data collection and analysis

Exploring Machine Learning Privacy/Utility trade-off from a hyperparameters Lens

Customized Local Differential Privacy for Multi-Agent Distributed Optimization

A Theoretical Analysis of Efficiency Constrained Utility-Privacy Bi-Objective Optimization in Federated Learning

How to DP-fy ML: A Practical Guide to Machine Learning with Differential Privacy

Privacy at a Price: Exploring its Dual Impact on AI Fairness