Abstract:Problem Definition: As the usage of livestreaming as a shopping channel skyrocketed during Covid-19 lockdowns (especially in China), numerous brands started to leverage livestream selling to drive sales. This paper investigates a firm’s optimal livestream adoption strategies and implementation tactics and the implications of livestream adoption for influencers and consumers. Methodology/Results: We develop a game-theoretic model to understand the strategic interactions between the firm, influencer, and consumers. Our analysis yields several interesting and nontrivial insights. First, we find that livestream selling should only be adopted when the influencer can attract a considerable number of viewers (i.e., the social influence is large) and this requirement diminishes as the influencer becomes more capable of identifying the product quality accurately (i.e., the endorsement reliability is high). Second, we assert that livestream adoption needs to be accompanied by appropriate selections of both influencer and product. While a larger social influence is always preferred by the firm when selecting an influencer, a higher endorsement reliability may not be favorable. Furthermore, featuring products with a mediocre, rather than top-notch, quality can help exploit more value from livestream selling. Third, our analysis of commission fee design indicates that the influencer should be granted a reasonable revenue share because the influencer’s substantial “skin in the game” would reward the firm with more pricing flexibility. We further caution that introducing a slotting fee never benefits the firm and might even lead to a “lose-lose” outcome. Lastly, in search of good deals, it does not work for consumers to blindly follow influencers with a larger social influence or a higher endorsement reliability. Surprisingly, an increase in the influencer’s endorsement reliability can even lead to a “triple-worse” outcome for the firm, influencer, and consumers. Managerial Implications: Our paper lays out several important operational strategies firms have at their disposal to better experiment and invest in livestream selling, including pricing policy, influencer selection, product selection, and commission fee design.

Live commerce retailing with online influencers: Two business models

A Model of Livestream Selling with Online Influencers

The Value of Influencer Channel in an Emerging Livestreaming E-Commerce Model

Live-streaming selling modes on a retail platform

Brand livestream mode options: AI vs KOL livestream in the platform supply chain

Retailer's Information Sharing and Manufacturer's Channel Expansion in the Live-Streaming E-commerce Era

Retailer’s Information Sharing and Manufacturer’s Channel Expansion in the Live-Streaming E-commerce Era

Livestream e-commerce in a platform supply chain: A product-fit uncertainty reduction perspective

Reselling or agency selling? The strategic role of live streaming commerce in distribution contract selection

Live-streaming Selling Strategies for Competitive Firms

Optimal marketing strategies for live streaming rooms in livestream e-commerce

Live streaming e-commerce supply chain decisions considering dominant streamer under agency selling and reselling formats

Should manufacturers open live streaming shopping channels?

How The Livestream Marketing Model Influence the Consumer Decision-Making Process Amid the COVID-19?

Optimal Livestream Selling Strategy with Buy-Online-and-return-in-store

Optimal selling format considering price discount strategy in live-streaming commerce

Proliferation in live streaming commerce, and key opinion leader selection

How Livestream Selling Strategy Interacts with Product Line Design

Consumer engagement in live streaming commerce: Value co-creation and incentive mechanisms

Retailer service strategy on livestreaming platforms considering free riding behavior

Selling Through Social Media Influencers in Influencer Marketing: Participation-Based Contract Versus Sales-Based Contract