Abstract:Problem Definition: As the usage of livestreaming as a shopping channel skyrocketed during Covid-19 lockdowns (especially in China), numerous brands started to leverage livestream selling to drive sales. This paper investigates a firm’s optimal livestream adoption strategies and implementation tactics and the implications of livestream adoption for influencers and consumers. Methodology/Results: We develop a game-theoretic model to understand the strategic interactions between the firm, influencer, and consumers. Our analysis yields several interesting and nontrivial insights. First, we find that livestream selling should only be adopted when the influencer can attract a considerable number of viewers (i.e., the social influence is large) and this requirement diminishes as the influencer becomes more capable of identifying the product quality accurately (i.e., the endorsement reliability is high). Second, we assert that livestream adoption needs to be accompanied by appropriate selections of both influencer and product. While a larger social influence is always preferred by the firm when selecting an influencer, a higher endorsement reliability may not be favorable. Furthermore, featuring products with a mediocre, rather than top-notch, quality can help exploit more value from livestream selling. Third, our analysis of commission fee design indicates that the influencer should be granted a reasonable revenue share because the influencer’s substantial “skin in the game” would reward the firm with more pricing flexibility. We further caution that introducing a slotting fee never benefits the firm and might even lead to a “lose-lose” outcome. Lastly, in search of good deals, it does not work for consumers to blindly follow influencers with a larger social influence or a higher endorsement reliability. Surprisingly, an increase in the influencer’s endorsement reliability can even lead to a “triple-worse” outcome for the firm, influencer, and consumers. Managerial Implications: Our paper lays out several important operational strategies firms have at their disposal to better experiment and invest in livestream selling, including pricing policy, influencer selection, product selection, and commission fee design.

Self-broadcasting or cooperating with streamers? A perspective on live streaming sales of fresh products

Live streaming e-commerce supply chain decisions considering dominant streamer under agency selling and reselling formats

Understanding the Role of Live Streamers in Live-Streaming E-Commerce

A Model of Livestream Selling with Online Influencers

Live-streaming selling modes on a retail platform

Brands’ Livestream Selling with Influencers’ Converting Fans into Consumers: Game LAnalysis and Data Validation

Live-streaming Selling Strategies for Competitive Firms

Channel Choice in Live Streaming Commerce

Impact of streamers’ characteristics on sales performance of search and experience products: Evidence from Douyin

The Streamer's sales strategy choice considering sales effort

Proliferation in live streaming commerce, and key opinion leader selection

Effects of streamer effort and popularity on livestream retailing performance: a mixed-method study

Retailer's Information Sharing and Manufacturer's Channel Expansion in the Live-Streaming E-commerce Era

Research on the Influence of Spillover Effect on dual-channel supply chain under the Background of Live-Streaming Marketing

Retailer’s Information Sharing and Manufacturer’s Channel Expansion in the Live-Streaming E-commerce Era

Research on Low-Carbon Strategies of Supply Chains, Considering Livestreaming Marketing Modes and Power Structures

Live streaming sales: Streamer type choice and limited sales strategy for a manufacturer

A Tripartite View on Performance Matrices of Live Commerce.

The Impact of Live Streaming on Competitive E-Commerce

Should manufacturers open live streaming shopping channels?