Abstract:The present study investigated how Cantonese speakers learning English as a second language (L2) would comprehend English irony and whether their L2 proficiency and use would moderate their irony processing. Thirty Cantonese speakers with differing English proficiency (intermediate vs advanced) were asked to complete an irony comprehension task in which they had to determine if given comments in literal or ironic situations were positive or negative. The irony comprehension task was immediately followed by a stimulated recall session to further explore the participants' thought processes while responding to the irony comprehension items. The results revealed that the participants were faster and more accurate when processing positively-valenced comments (literal praise, ironic criticism), compared to negatively-valenced ones (literal criticism, ironic praise). The findings suggest that learners had greater difficulty identifying ironic praises than ironic criticisms, underscoring the role of valence in second language irony inferencing. The stimulated recall data suggested that the anticipation of irony may accelerate the identification of ironic criticisms. While proficiency facilitated the speed of irony comprehension, the duration of L2 use, especially in speaking, emerged as an important factor in moderating the accuracy of irony comprehension. Understanding irony in a second language (L2) can pose challenges. It goes beyond mere knowledge of vocabulary and grammar; it requires the ability to identify the speaker's intent, which can be hidden or indirect. For instance, when someone says "you are so smart" after a friend does something foolish, they are actually criticizing the friend using a seemingly positive remark. This is referred to as ironic criticism. Conversely, if someone says "you are a lousy cook" after thoroughly enjoying a delicious meal prepared by a friend, they are actually complimenting the friend using a seemingly negative phrase. This is known as ironic praise. In our study, we investigated the extent to which Cantonese speakers comprehend irony in L2 English. Participants were presented with comments and asked to determine whether they were praise or criticism, in both literal and ironic contexts. Subsequently, we examined their thought processes through additional questions. Our findings revealed that learners were quicker and more accurate in identifying comments containing positive words (literal praise and ironic criticism) compared to comments with negative words (literal criticism and ironic praise). Moreover, we observed that an expectation of irony facilitated the understanding of ironic criticism, whereas comprehending ironic praise proved more challenging. Additionally, while English proficiency contributed to faster comprehension of irony, the frequency of English usage, particularly in daily conversations, influenced the accuracy of understanding. Based on our results, we recommend that language teachers promote learners' awareness of understanding ironic praises and encourage the integration of the second language into their daily lives to enhance their ability to understand and appreciate the ironic nuances in L2.

Ecological factors in comprehension of irony

The role of mentalizing capacity and ecological language diversity on irony comprehension in bilingual adults

Isn't It Ironic? An Electrophysiological Exploration of Figurative Language Processing

L2 irony comprehension and the role of L2 proficiency and use

Brain correlates of discourse processing: An fMRI investigation of irony and conventional metaphor comprehension

How Does Understanding of Social Situations and Other's Intention Contribute to Idiom and Irony Comprehension in Autism Spectrum Disorder?

On the specificity of figurative language comprehension impairment in schizophrenia and its relation to cognitive skills but not psychopathological symptoms - Study on metaphor, humor and irony

DHH Students' Comprehension of Irony in Self-paced Reading

Looking at the brains behind figurative language--a quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on metaphor, idiom, and irony processing

Uncovering echoic mechanisms in verbal irony comprehension

Neurocognitive mechanisms of figurative language processing—Evidence from clinical dysfunctions

Saying What You Don’t Mean: Cognitive Mechanism of Verbal Irony

Investigating satirical discourse processing and comprehension: the role of cognitive, demographic, and pragmatic features

Verbal irony comprehension in older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

A Study of Chinese Learners’ Ability to Comprehend Irony

Children's processing of written irony: An eye-tracking study

Uighur College Students’ Irony Comprehension in Chinese

Irony detection in patients with borderline personality disorder: an experimental study examining schizotypal traits, response biases and empathy

Neural substrates of figurative language during natural speech perception: an fMRI study

Exploring the role of conventionality in children's interpretation of ironic remarks

Selective View of the Last 50 Years of the Experimental Psycholinguistics of Idiom, Metaphor, and Irony: A Commentary