Colonoscopy and endoscopic therapy of hemorrhage from viral colitis.

S. Rathgaber,D. Rex

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(93)70246-1

IF: 10.396

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

DHH Students' Comprehension of Irony in Self-paced Reading

Degao Li,Shaai Wang,Fan Zhang,Li Zhu,Tao Wang,Xiaolu Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enz009

2019-01-01

Abstract:Irony comprehension can be a kind of challenge to those who are relatively less skillful in reading. To examine how DHH college students (DCSs) were different from hearing college students (HCSs) in the reading of ironic discourses, we conducted two experiments in the self-paced reading task. In Experiment 1, the statement was either literally congruent with the preceding context or had to be understood in an ironic way in each trial; In Experiment 2, the statement was the same but the context was not across the two levels of discourse type. The DCSs generally had a poorer performance than the hearing participants. Although able to comprehend ironies, they had a significantly lower efficiency than their hearing counterparts. The results were consistently in agreement with the prediction of the graded salience hypothesis (Giora, R. (1997). Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 183-206. doi:10.1515/cogl.1997.8.3.183) and the parallel-constraint-satisfaction framework (Pexman, P. M. (2008). It's fascinating research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(4)286-290. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00591.x), and the DCSs' performance appears to indicate an amplified version of this support. It is implied that educational environments should be created in which deaf and DHH students are encouraged to do as much reading as possible. Exercises should be designed in helping them to improve vocabulary and syntactic skills in general and to improve skills of inference-making in particular.
Exploring the role of conventionality in children's interpretation of ironic remarks

Debra L Burnett

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000914000798

Abstract:Irony comprehension in seven- and eight-year-old children with typically developing language skills was explored under the framework of the graded salience hypothesis. Target ironic remarks, either conventional or novel/situation-specific, were presented following brief story contexts. Children's responses to comprehension questions were used to determine their understanding of the components of irony: speaker meaning, speaker attitude, and speaker intent. It was hypothesized that conventional remarks would be easier to comprehend than novel/situation-specific remarks because they are more likely to be familiar to the children. Results indicated that children demonstrated better comprehension of speaker meaning for conventional remarks than for novel/situation-specific remarks but no significant differences were found for inferring speaker attitude or speaker intent.
Children's On-Line Processing of Epistemic Modals.

Vincenzo Moscati,Likan Zhan,Peng Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000916000313

IF: 2.7007

2016-01-01

Journal of Child Language

Abstract:In this paper we investigated the real-time processing of epistemic modals in five-year-olds. In a simple reasoning scenario, we monitored children's eye-movements while processing a sentence with modal expressions of different force (might/must). Children were also asked to judge the truth-value of the target sentences at the end of the reasoning task. Consistent with previous findings (Noveck, 2001), we found that children's behavioural responses were much less accurate compared to adults. Their eye-movements, however, revealed that children did not treat the two modal expressions alike. As soon as a modal expression was presented, children and adults showed a similar fixation pattern that varied as a function of the modal expression they heard. It is only at the very end of the sentence that children's fixations diverged from the adult ones. We discuss these findings in relation to the proposal that children narrow down the set of possible outcomes in undetermined reasoning scenarios and endorse only one possibility among several (Acredolo & Horobin, 1987, Ozturk & Papafragou, 2015).
L2 irony comprehension and the role of L2 proficiency and use

Weiyi Li,Jookyoung Jung

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2023.2277777

2023-11-05

Language Awareness

Abstract:The present study investigated how Cantonese speakers learning English as a second language (L2) would comprehend English irony and whether their L2 proficiency and use would moderate their irony processing. Thirty Cantonese speakers with differing English proficiency (intermediate vs advanced) were asked to complete an irony comprehension task in which they had to determine if given comments in literal or ironic situations were positive or negative. The irony comprehension task was immediately followed by a stimulated recall session to further explore the participants' thought processes while responding to the irony comprehension items. The results revealed that the participants were faster and more accurate when processing positively-valenced comments (literal praise, ironic criticism), compared to negatively-valenced ones (literal criticism, ironic praise). The findings suggest that learners had greater difficulty identifying ironic praises than ironic criticisms, underscoring the role of valence in second language irony inferencing. The stimulated recall data suggested that the anticipation of irony may accelerate the identification of ironic criticisms. While proficiency facilitated the speed of irony comprehension, the duration of L2 use, especially in speaking, emerged as an important factor in moderating the accuracy of irony comprehension. Understanding irony in a second language (L2) can pose challenges. It goes beyond mere knowledge of vocabulary and grammar; it requires the ability to identify the speaker's intent, which can be hidden or indirect. For instance, when someone says "you are so smart" after a friend does something foolish, they are actually criticizing the friend using a seemingly positive remark. This is referred to as ironic criticism. Conversely, if someone says "you are a lousy cook" after thoroughly enjoying a delicious meal prepared by a friend, they are actually complimenting the friend using a seemingly negative phrase. This is known as ironic praise. In our study, we investigated the extent to which Cantonese speakers comprehend irony in L2 English. Participants were presented with comments and asked to determine whether they were praise or criticism, in both literal and ironic contexts. Subsequently, we examined their thought processes through additional questions. Our findings revealed that learners were quicker and more accurate in identifying comments containing positive words (literal praise and ironic criticism) compared to comments with negative words (literal criticism and ironic praise). Moreover, we observed that an expectation of irony facilitated the understanding of ironic criticism, whereas comprehending ironic praise proved more challenging. Additionally, while English proficiency contributed to faster comprehension of irony, the frequency of English usage, particularly in daily conversations, influenced the accuracy of understanding. Based on our results, we recommend that language teachers promote learners' awareness of understanding ironic praises and encourage the integration of the second language into their daily lives to enhance their ability to understand and appreciate the ironic nuances in L2.

linguistics
A Study of Chinese Learners’ Ability to Comprehend Irony

Rod Ellis,Yan Zhu,Natsuko Shintani,Carsten Roever

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.11.003

IF: 1.86

2021-01-01

Journal of Pragmatics

Abstract:The purpose of this study was to investigate Chinese University students' ability to recognize irony. To this end, we developed a test that included literal and ironic items and focused on the students' ability to identify which of the items were ironic. 112 first- and second-year Chinese university students completed the test, a C-test as a measure of language proficiency, and a language experience questionnaire. 24 native speakers completed the irony test and C-test to provide a baseline for comparison. Results showed that the learners' scores were markedly lower than the NS's on the ironic items but not on literal items. Both learners and NSs had difficulty with the positive irony items. The learners' response times were also markedly slower than the NSs. There were significant but relatively weak correlations between the learners' irony scores and their proficiency and the amount of time they had spent in an English-speaking country. Overall, the results of the study confirm the findings of previous studies, namely that irony is a late acquired aspect of L2 pragmatic competence. We concluded that unlike NSs, even those learners with advanced language proficiency rely on explicit processing strategies to detect irony and propose explicit instruction is needed to help learners acquire the ability to recognize irony.
Uighur College Students’ Irony Comprehension in Chinese

Xiaoli Chen,Degao Li,Xiaolu Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069211056128

2022-01-01

International Journal of Bilingualism

Abstract:Aims and objectives/purpose/research questions: Irony comprehension can be more demanding than literal comprehension in L1. This study aimed to seek an answer to how bilinguals perform in L2 in irony comprehension. Design/methodology/approach: Totally, 85 Uighur College students participated in a self-paced reading task in Chinese, with 81 Chinese native speakers as the controls. In Experiment 1, a scenario was followed by a commentary statement in which the critical word either was literally congruent with the context in meaning or could only be ironically understood. In Experiment 2, the same statement was preceded by three sentences which were either literally consistent with the critical word or created a context for the critical word to be understood ironically. Data and analysis: ANOVAs were conducted on participants reading times (RTs) to the critical words and commentary statement endings in the 14 pairs of discourses. They did not have different RTs for the critical words across the ironic and non-ironic conditions in L1, but had significantly longer RTs in the ironic condition than in the non-ironic condition in L2. Their RTs for the commentary statement endings were significantly longer in the ironic condition than in the non-ironic condition in both experiments, regardless of whether the materials were presented in L1 or L2. Findings/conclusions: Irony comprehension is similar in L2 to how it is in L1. However, salient meaning retrieval (in Experiment 1) and inference-making (in Experiment 2) in irony comprehension, as assumed by the Graded Salience Hypothesis, were more likely to be revealed in L2 than in L1. Originality: This seems to be the first study in the native and non-native domain of irony processing in the procedure of discourse reading. Significance/implications: L2 learners should do as many practices as possible to improve their reading proficiency in the target language.
Verbal irony comprehension in older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

Geneviève Gaudreau,Laura Monetta,Joël Macoir,Robert Laforce,Stéphane Poulin,Carol Hudon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034655

IF: 3.424

2013-11-01

Neuropsychology

Abstract:OBJECTIVE: The present study examined verbal irony comprehension in 31 aMCI and 33 healthy control (HC) subjects. Although nonliteral language impairments have been evidenced in individuals with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) or Alzheimer's disease (AD), verbal irony comprehension remained somewhat underinvestigated in these populations.METHOD: A task measured the capacity to attribute Second-order mental state (i.e., theory of mind; ToM) as well as the ability to distinguish an ironic statement from a lie. Subjects were asked to identify, in a short story, whether the final assertion was a lie or an ironic joke.RESULTS: Our results showed lower performance on a verbal irony comprehension task for aMCI individuals compared with those in the HC group. This pattern of results was related to Second-order ToM and executive functions.CONCLUSION: These findings have implications for the conceptualization of aMCI, and foster investigation of social language comprehension in neurodegenerative diseases such as prodromal AD. Results are discussed in light of actual linguistic theories. The importance of evaluating the role of underlying cognitive processes in verbal irony comprehension is also emphasized.

psychology, clinical,neurosciences
Prosodic and Visual Cues Facilitate Irony Comprehension by Mandarin-Speaking Children With Cochlear Implants

Qianxi Yu,Honglan Li,Shanpeng Li,Ping Tang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_jslhr-23-00701

2024-06-01

Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research

Abstract:Purpose: This study investigated irony comprehension by Mandarin-speaking children with cochlear implants, focusing on how prosodic and visual cues contribute to their comprehension, and whether second-order Theory of Mind is required for using these cues. Method: We tested 52 Mandarin-speaking children with cochlear implants (aged 3–7 years) and 52 age- and gender-matched children with normal hearing. All children completed a Theory of Mind test and a story comprehension test. Ironic stories were presented in three conditions, each providing different cues: (a) context-only, (b) context and prosody, and (c) context, prosody, and visual cues. Comparisons were conducted on the accuracy of story understanding across the three conditions to examine the role of prosodic and visual cues. Results: The results showed that, compared to the context-only condition, the additional prosodic and visual cues both improved the accuracy of irony comprehension for children with cochlear implants, similar to their normal-hearing peers. Furthermore, such improvements were observed for all children, regardless of whether they passed the second-order Theory of Mind test or not. Conclusions: This study is the first to demonstrate the benefits of prosodic and visual cues in irony comprehension, without reliance on second-order Theory of Mind, for Mandarin-speaking children with cochlear implants. It implies potential insights for utilizing prosodic and visual cues in intervention strategies to promote irony comprehension.

rehabilitation,audiology & speech-language pathology,linguistics
Uncovering echoic mechanisms in verbal irony comprehension

Ningning Cao,Ling Zhou,Shaojie Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2024.53

2024-10-09

Language and Cognition

Abstract:Whereas some studies suggest that ironic praise necessitates a longer processing time than ironic criticism, others posit that the two are processed at comparable speeds. We hypothesize that the presence of an echoic antecedent within the preceding context may at least partially account for these conflicting findings. To investigate this matter, we analyzed reading times and accuracy stemming from two types of contexts: echoic and non-echoic. Our results demonstrate that ironic criticism was judged to be more ironic in both echoic and non-echoic contexts, while ironic praise was rated as more ironic in an echoic context than in a non-echoic context. Additionally, echoing contexts facilitate the comprehension of ironic criticism, but cause ironic praise to be processed more slowly. There was also an observed asymmetry between the two forms of irony. Ironic criticism demonstrated high accuracy and was rated as more ironic than ironic praise. Furthermore, ironic criticism was read faster in an echoic context, whereas performance was similar in a non-echoic context for both types. These findings suggest that echoing context affects ironic criticism and ironic praise differently, implying that distinct mechanisms may be at work in understanding irony in echoic and non-echoic contexts.

psychology, experimental,linguistics
The role of mentalizing capacity and ecological language diversity on irony comprehension in bilingual adults

Mehrgol Tiv,Elisabeth O’Regan,Debra Titone

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-022-01349-4

2022-08-25

Abstract:Diverse bilingual experiences have implications for language comprehension, including pragmatic elements such as verbal irony. Irony comprehension is shaped by an interplay of linguistic, cognitive, and social factors, including individual differences in bilingual experience. We examined the relationship between individual differences related to bilingualism, specifically, the capacity to understand others' mental states and ambient exposure to language diversity, on irony comprehension. We tested 54 healthy bilingual adults, living in a linguistically diverse region—Montréal, Canada—on an irony comprehension task. This task involved reading positive and negative short stories that concluded with an ironic or literal statement, which were rated on appropriateness and perceived irony. While both irony forms were rated as less appropriate and more ironic than literal statements, ironic criticisms (following a negative context) were rated as more appropriate and higher in perceived irony than ironic compliments (following a positive context). As expected, these ratings varied as a function of individual differences in mentalizing and neighborhood language diversity. Greater mentalizing patterned with more appropriate ratings to ironic statements in high language diversity neighborhoods and with less appropriate ratings to ironic statements in low language diversity neighborhoods. Perceived irony ratings to ironic compliments increased with mentalizing as neighborhood language diversity increased. These results indicate that pragmatic language comprehension and its social cognitive underpinnings may be environmentally contextualized processes.

psychology, experimental
Do They Really Mean It? Children's Inference of Speaker Intentions and the Role of Age and Gender

K Rothermich,O Caivano,L J Knoll,V Talwar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830919878742

Abstract:Interpreting other people's intentions during communication represents a remarkable challenge for children. Although many studies have examined children's understanding of, for example, sarcasm, less is known about their interpretation. Using realistic audiovisual scenes, we invited 124 children between 8 and 12 years old to watch video clips of young adults using different speaker intentions. After watching each video clip, children answered questions about the characters and their beliefs, and the perceived friendliness of the speaker. Children's responses reveal age and gender differences in the ability to interpret speaker belief and social intentions, especially for scenarios conveying teasing and prosocial lies. We found that the ability to infer speaker belief of prosocial lies and to interpret social intentions increases with age. Our results suggest that children at the age of 8 years already show adult-like abilities to understand literal statements, whereas the ability to infer specific social intentions, such as teasing and prosocial lies, is still developing between the age of 8 and 12 years. Moreover, girls performed better in classifying prosocial lies and sarcasm as insincere than boys. The outcomes expand our understanding of how children observe speaker intentions and suggest further research into the development of teasing and prosocial lie interpretation.
How Does Understanding of Social Situations and Other's Intention Contribute to Idiom and Irony Comprehension in Autism Spectrum Disorder?

Nira Mashal,Naama Lellouche

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14101034

IF: 3.333

2024-10-19

Brain Sciences

Abstract:Background/Objectives: Figurative language is a central tool for enriching spoken and written languages, and it is important for building social relationships. Difficulties in figurative language understanding may impair social adjustment. Some studies have found more gaps in the understanding of irony and idioms among children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) compared to those of their peers with typical development (TD). To date, no studies have examined the relationship between the ability to understand social situations (as a separate ability) and the ability to understand irony and idioms. The present study examined the roles of theory of mind (ToM) and social situation understanding in the comprehension of idioms and ironic criticism. Methods: The current study included 58 participants aged 8–11, including 28 children with high-functioning ASD and 30 children with TD matched by age, gender, and nonverbal intelligence. All the participants completed a ToM questionnaire that assesses their understanding of others' intentions, as well as a questionnaire pertaining to their comprehension of social situations, ironic criticism, and idioms. Results: TD children outperformed the autistic children in idiom and irony understanding, as well as in ToM and social situation understanding. Understanding social situations and ToM contributed to idiom and irony understanding, with ToM ability uniquely contributing to irony (but not to idiom) understanding. Path analysis revealed that social cognitive abilities mediated the link between group affiliation and vocabulary, affecting figurative language comprehension. Conclusions: The present study demonstrates that social cognition skills influence the ability to understand ironic criticism and idioms, mediating the association between vocabulary and figurative language comprehension.

neurosciences
Isn't It Ironic? An Electrophysiological Exploration of Figurative Language Processing

Stefanie Regel,Thomas C. Gunter,Angela D. Friederici

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21411

2011-02-01

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract:Abstract Although the neurocognitive processes underlying the comprehension of figurative language, especially metaphors and idioms, have been studied extensively, less is known about the processing of irony. In two experiments using event-related brain potentials (ERPs), we examined the types of cognitive processes involved in the comprehension of ironic and literal sentences and their relative time course. The experiments varied in modality (auditory, visual), task demands (comprehension task vs. passive reading), and probability of stimulus occurrence. ERPs consistently revealed a large late positivity (i.e., P600 component) in the absence of an N400 component for irony compared to equivalent literal sentences independent of modality. This P600 was shown to be unaffected by the factors task demands and probability of occurrence. Taken together, the findings suggest that the observed P600 is related to irony processing, and might be a reflection of pragmatic interpretation processes. During the comprehension of irony, no semantic integration difficulty arises (absence of N400), but late inferential processes appear to be necessary for understanding ironic meanings (presence of P600). This finding calls for a revision of current models of figurative language processing.

psychology, experimental,neurosciences
Comprehending irony via sentence-final particles by Chinese children with autism spectrum disorders

Di Zhang,Zhibo Wang,Baopeng Ma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.12594

2024-02-07

Abstract:We examined the effects of sentence-final particles (SFPs) in comprehending different types of irony by Chinese-speaking children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). We tested 15 children with ASDs, along with another 15 typically developing (TD) children. In our test, by manipulating the use of the prototypical SFP / a /, participants were required to judge the speaker's attitude and real intention in ironic utterances of 16 stories and to further explain the language phenomenon. The results of a three-way analysis of variance showed a significant difference between the two groups: first, children with ASDs performed significantly worse than did their TD counterparts; second, while TD children relied more on SFPs to understand irony of compliment, children with ASDs only performed better with SFPs in comprehending irony of criticism. The differences are discussed in relation to theory of mind, the frequency of utterance, and rules of cognition.

psychology, social
Saying What You Don’t Mean: Cognitive Mechanism of Verbal Irony

黄彬瑶,王小潞

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1042.2013.02118

2013-01-01

Abstract:Irony refers to a phenomenon in which people say something they do not really mean.Numerous empirical studies have been conducted focusing on the processing models of irony and the factors which influence its processing.Relevant literature indicates that the understanding of ironic expressions complies more with the constraint-satisfaction model, a parallel model of language processing, in which all different stages are affected and restricted by such factors as types of irony, intonation, contexts and individual cognitive differences.Future research may be directed to issues like the unique nature of irony differentiating from other forms of non-literal language, the interactions between various influencing factors in irony processing, the combined use of different experimental paradigms, and the characteristics of Chinese irony compared with irony in other languages.
An Eye Tracker Study on the Understanding of Implicitness in French Elementary School Children

Maria Pia Bucci,Aikaterini Premeti,Béatrice Godart-Wendling

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14121195

IF: 3.333

2024-11-28

Brain Sciences

Abstract:Background: The aim of this study is to use an eye tracker to compare the understanding of three forms of implicitness (i.e., presupposition, conversational implicatures, and irony) in 139 pupils from the first to the fifth year of elementary school. Methods: The child was invited to read short texts composed of a context about some characters and a target sentence conveying one of the three kinds of implicitness. After that, there was a comprehension yes/no question to check whether the child had understood the implicit content of the target sentence. At the same time eye, movements were recorded by a remote system (Pro Fusion by Tobii). The number of correct answers, the duration, and the number of fixations on the texts were measured. Results: We showed that children's reading time is positively correlated with the accurate comprehension of implicitness, and that children similarly understand the three types of implicitness. Furthermore, the number and the duration of fixations depend both on the age of the children and on their good or poor understanding of the implicit contents. This fact is particularly noticeable for children in the first-grade class, for whom fixations are significantly longer and more frequent when they correctly understand sentences containing implicitness. Conclusion: These results argue in favor of the possibility of teaching the comprehension of some types of implicitness (presupposition, implicature, and irony) from an early age.

neurosciences
Role of sentence-final particles and prosody in irony comprehension in Cantonese-speaking children with and without Autism Spectrum Disorders

Jackie P W Li,Thomas Law,Gary Y H Lam,Carol K S To

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2012.734893

Abstract:English-speaking children with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) are less capable of using prosodic cues such as intonation for irony comprehension. Prosodic cues, in particular intonation, in Cantonese are relatively restricted while sentence-final particles (SFPs) may be used for this pragmatic function. This study investigated the use of prosodic cues and SFPs in irony comprehension in Cantonese-speaking children with and without ASD. Thirteen children with ASD (8;3-12;9) were language-matched with 13 typically developing (TD) peers. By manipulating prosodic cues and SFPs, 16 stories with an ironic remark were constructed. Participants had to judge the speaker's belief and intention. Both groups performed similarly well in judging the speaker's belief. For the speaker's intention, the TD group relied more on SFPs. The ASD group performed significantly poorer and did not rely on either cue. SFPs may play a salient role in Cantonese irony comprehension. The differences between the two groups were discussed by considering the literature on theory of mind.
Irony detection in patients with borderline personality disorder: an experimental study examining schizotypal traits, response biases and empathy

Anne Katrin Felsenheimer,Carolin Kieckhäfer,Alexander Michael Rapp

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40479-022-00194-w

2022-10-04

Abstract:Background: In verbal irony we often convey meanings that oppose the literal words. To look behind these words, we need to integrate perspectives of ourselves, others, and their beliefs about us. Although patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) experience problems in social cognition and schizotypal symptoms, research on irony comprehension mainly focused on the schizophrenic spectrum. Accounting for possible negative biases in BPD, the current study examined the detection of praising and critical irony in a text messaging interface. Methods: The cross-sectional study included 30 patients and 30 matched controls, who completed measures of cognitive and affective empathy (Interpersonal Reactivity Index, IRI), schizotypal (Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire; SPQ), and borderline symptoms (Borderline Symptom List; BSL-23) and the irony detection task. The irony task contained critical and praising remarks embedded in text messages. Asking for literality (ironic vs. literal) and intention ratings (critical to praising) of the stimuli, it allowed to analyze the sensitivity of literality detection as well as implicit and explicit response biases in a signal detection framework. Results: Borderline symptoms explained lower sensitivity for the detection of literal and ironic statements across groups. Whereas HC showed a negativity bias when implicitly asked about the literalness of the statement, patients with BPD perceived praising utterances as less praising when explicitly asked about their perceived intention. Neither empathy nor schizotypy explained outcomes beyond borderline symptoms. Conclusions: This was the first study to show lower detection of verbal irony in patients with BPD. While patients were less biased when asked about the literality of a statement, they perceived praising remarks as less positive on explicit measurements. The results highlight the importance of congruent, transparent communication in promoting epistemic trust in individuals with BPD.
Picture This: A Review of Research Relating to Narrative Processing by Moving Image Versus Language

Elspeth Jajdelska,Miranda Anderson,Christopher Butler,Nigel Fabb,Elizabeth Finnigan,Ian Garwood,Stephen Kelly,Wendy Kirk,Karin Kukkonen,Sinead Mullally,Stephan Schwan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01161

IF: 3.8

2019-06-26

Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract:Reading fiction for pleasure is robustly correlated with improved cognitive attainment and other benefits. It is also in decline among young people in developed nations, in part because of competition from moving image fiction. We review existing research on the differences between reading or hearing verbal fiction and watching moving image fiction, as well as looking more broadly at research on image or text interactions and visual versus verbal processing. We conclude that verbal narrative generates more diverse responses than moving image narrative. We note that reading and viewing narrative are different tasks, with different cognitive loads. Viewing moving image narrative mostly involves visual processing with some working memory engagement, whereas reading narrative involves verbal processing, visual imagery, and personal memory (<a href="#ref214">Xu et al., 2005</a>). Attempts to compare the two by creating equivalent stimuli and task demands face a number of challenges. We discuss the difficulties of such comparative approaches. We then investigate the possibility of identifying lower level processing mechanisms that might distinguish cognition of the two media and propose internal scene construction and working memory as foci for future research. Although many of the sources we draw on concentrate on English-speaking participants in European or North American settings, we also cover material relating to speakers of Dutch, German, Hebrew, and Japanese in their respective countries, and studies of a remote Turkish mountain community.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Ecological factors in comprehension of irony

Teresa Schubert

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00123-2

2022-10-19

Nature Reviews Psychology

Abstract:Living in a more linguistically diverse neighbourhood is associated with a stronger relationship between mentalizing capacity and comprehension of ironic statements, according to new research in Memory & Cognition . These findings suggest a strong effect of ecological influences on the interpretation of figurative language.

Colonoscopy and endoscopic therapy of hemorrhage from viral colitis.

DHH Students' Comprehension of Irony in Self-paced Reading

Exploring the role of conventionality in children's interpretation of ironic remarks

Children's On-Line Processing of Epistemic Modals.

L2 irony comprehension and the role of L2 proficiency and use

A Study of Chinese Learners’ Ability to Comprehend Irony

Uighur College Students’ Irony Comprehension in Chinese

Verbal irony comprehension in older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

Prosodic and Visual Cues Facilitate Irony Comprehension by Mandarin-Speaking Children With Cochlear Implants

Uncovering echoic mechanisms in verbal irony comprehension

The role of mentalizing capacity and ecological language diversity on irony comprehension in bilingual adults

Do They Really Mean It? Children's Inference of Speaker Intentions and the Role of Age and Gender

How Does Understanding of Social Situations and Other's Intention Contribute to Idiom and Irony Comprehension in Autism Spectrum Disorder?

Isn't It Ironic? An Electrophysiological Exploration of Figurative Language Processing

Comprehending irony via sentence-final particles by Chinese children with autism spectrum disorders

Saying What You Don’t Mean: Cognitive Mechanism of Verbal Irony

An Eye Tracker Study on the Understanding of Implicitness in French Elementary School Children

Role of sentence-final particles and prosody in irony comprehension in Cantonese-speaking children with and without Autism Spectrum Disorders

Irony detection in patients with borderline personality disorder: an experimental study examining schizotypal traits, response biases and empathy

Picture This: A Review of Research Relating to Narrative Processing by Moving Image Versus Language

Ecological factors in comprehension of irony