Editors' Note: Associations of Social Isolation and Loneliness With Later Dementia

Siegler,J. E.,Galetta,S.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000201560

IF: 9.9

2022-11-29

Neurology

Abstract:In their analysis of the UK Biobank cohort (n = 462,619 patients, with 4,998 developing all-cause dementia), Dr. Shen et al. illustrate the complex association between social isolation and loneliness and incident dementia. In addition to characterizing this relationship between clinical factors, the investigators support their findings with radiographic evidence. Socially isolated individuals not only had a higher risk of later dementia but also had smaller gray matter volumes in several frontal and temporal regions. Dr. Kawada contests the notion that social isolation may be causally related to smaller gray matter volumes and suggests other factors may be operative including male sex, metabolic changes, and genetics. In response, Shen et al. emphasize that no causation was implied by their study. The authors also performed a subgroup analysis of their data stratified by sex, with social isolation being independently associated with dementia in both women (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.09–1.40) and men (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.12–1.42). In a separate comment, Dr. Holwerda cites their published experience indicating loneliness (as opposed to social isolation) may be more strongly tied to incident dementia. Shen et al. counter that the study population and the duration of follow-up may account for these different observations. This exchange highlights the variability in methods for assessing physical and psychosocial behaviors and their association with dementia. Whether these symptoms are merely biomarkers of later cognitive decline or represent modifiable risk factors also deserves further scrutiny. In their analysis of the UK Biobank cohort (n = 462,619 patients, with 4,998 developing all-cause dementia), Dr. Shen et al. illustrate the complex association between social isolation and loneliness and incident dementia. In addition to characterizing this relationship between clinical factors, the investigators support their findings with radiographic evidence. Socially isolated individuals not only had a higher risk of later dementia but also had smaller gray matter volumes in several frontal and temporal regions. Dr. Kawada contests the notion that social isolation may be causally related to smaller gray matter volumes and suggests other factors may be operative including male sex, metabolic changes, and genetics. In response, Shen et al. emphasize that no causation was implied by their study. The authors also performed a subgroup analysis of their data stratified by sex, with social isolation being independently associated with dementia in both women (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.09–1.40) and men (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.12–1.42). In a separate comment, Dr. Holwerda cites their published experience indicating loneliness (as opposed to social isolation) may be more strongly tied to incident dementia. Shen et al. counter that the study population and the duration of follow-up may account for these different observations. This exchange highlights the variability in methods for assessing physical and psychosocial behaviors and their association with dementia. Whether these symptoms are merely biomarkers of later cognitive decline or represent modifiable risk factors also deserves further scrutiny.

clinical neurology