Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate and determine clinical outcomes and survival rates of straight and extended length subcrestal angulated (ELSA) implants (20–24 mm lengths) placed for immediate (up to 72 h post‐operative) or delayed rehabilitation (4 months post‐operative) of severely atrophic maxillae. Prosthetic treatment consisted of interim and definitive implant‐supported fixed implant‐supported prostheses with up to 3 years of function. Materials and Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted of 38 patients (five dropped out; final total was 33), treated between 2017 and 2019 in a private practice. Extended length subcrestal angulated (ELSA) implants and conventional endosseous straight implants (Southern Implants, Irene, South Africa) with (fixed) full arch prostheses were used to restore patients with edentulous maxillae immediately (within 72 hs) or delayed (4 months). ELSA implants have subcrestal angulations of 24° and 36° of the restorative platforms, external hexagon crestal anti‐rotation abutment connections, and lengths between 18 and 26 mm. Implant loading was determined by implant insertion torque values (as determined on the surgical units); 120 Ncm was the threshold level for immediate loading. Clinical and radiographic examinations were done that recorded the clinical outcomes of implants and prostheses. SPSS was used to process the data. Results Thirty‐three patients and 187 implants were included with follow‐up periods of at least 12 months (range 12–36 months). The mean age of the study population was 62.6 ± 8.4 years old (at the time of implant placement). Thirty‐three patients (86.8%) were followed for 12 months; 13 patients (39.4%) were followed for 24–35 months; 9 patients (27.3%) were followed for 36 months. In total, 13 implants in six patients failed secondary to sinus infections. Mean bone levels (MBLs) were respectively: 0.88 ± 2.12 mm at loading, –1.53 ± 2.03 mm at 12 months, –2.26 ± 1.45 mm at 24 months, and –2.54 ± 1.46 mm at 36 months. The ELSA implants showed significantly lower (p = 0.014) MBL at 36 months than did the conventional implants. One hundred thirty‐seven implants were placed and loaded within 72 h; 50 implants were placed and loaded 4 months post placement. The combined implant survival rates were 93.0% at 12 months, 91.1% at 24 months, and 100% at 36 months. The ELSA implants showed significantly lower (p = 0.014) MBLs at 36 months when compared to the conventional implants. Conclusions The results of this retrospective clinical chart review indicated that the use of ELSA implants placed into anterior maxillae and nasal crests with accentuated distal tilts (>30°) and simultaneous sinus augmentation provided favorable outcomes for prosthetic rehabilitation in patients with severe atrophic maxillae. ELSA implants placed with simultaneous sinus augmentation are an alternative option to zygomatic implants (ZI) when immediate loading is prescribed. Sinus infections were thought to be the proximate causes of all implant failures. Further long‐term clinical studies are warranted with larger patient populations.

Endoscopic Inferior Meatal Antrostomy (EIMA) for the Removal of Dental Implants Displaced into the Maxillary Sinus

The Rationale for Endoscopic Inferior Meatal Antrostomy

Endoscopic Inferior Meatal Antrostomy for Antrochoanal Polyps: A Long-Term Follow-Up

Clinical and Patient-Centered Outcomes Following Rehabilitation of Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla Using Six Implants Placed Simultaneously with Bilateral Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Retrospective Case Series.

Temporary Submucosal Inferior Maxillary Antrostomy: A Modification of the Inferior Antrostomy

Comparative Evaluation of Endo-sinus Bone Augmentation after Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation Without Grafting Using Two Radiographic Methods.

Displacement of a Dental Implant into the Maxillary Sinus after Internal Sinus Floor Elevation: Report of a Case and Review of Literature.

Evaluation of New Bone Formation after Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation and Simultaneous Implant Placement Without Grafting by Two Radiographic Methods

STIMA: Submucosal Temporary Inferior Maxillary Antrostomy: A Modification of Conventional Antrostomy, A Retrospective Review

Immediate rehabilitation of severely atrophic maxillae using conventional and extended length subcrestal angulated (ELSA) implants: A retrospective analysis of 187 implants in 33 patients with up to three years of function

Repositioning of the Bone Window in Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation with Simultaneous Implant Placement: A Retrospective Radiographic Study.

Efficacy of simultaneous placement of dental implants in osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation with and without bone augmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Accidental migration of a dental implant into the nasal cavity

Foreign bodies of dental iatrogenic origin displaced in the maxillary sinus - A safety and efficacy analysis of a retrospective study

Removal of the Residual Roots Displaced into the Maxillary Sinus Via Endoscopy

Histopathology of Recalcitrant Maxillary Sinusitis Necessitating Endoscopic Medial Maxillectomy

Characteristics and impacts of dental implant displacement into the maxillary sinus

The impact of maxillary dimensions on determining surgical approach of fungal ball in the maxillary sinus

[Extended Inferior Meatal Maxillary Antrostomy Through Inferior Turbinate Reversing Approach for Maxillary Lesions].

Clinical Outcomes of Implants Placed with Transcrestal Maxillary Sinus Elevation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Surgical Approach to Odontogenic Maxillary Sinusitis Caused by Tooth Root Displacement into the Maxillary Sinus: A Case Report