Histopathology of Recalcitrant Maxillary Sinusitis Necessitating Endoscopic Medial Maxillectomy

Vidit Talati,Ali M. Baird,Paolo Gattuso,Mary Allen‐Proctor,Peter Papagiannopoulos,Pete S. Batra,Peter Filip,Bobby A. Tajudeen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31262
IF: 2.97
2024-01-06
The Laryngoscope
Abstract:Recalcitrant maxillary sinusitis is a multifactorial disorder associated with heterogeneous disease processes that can persist after maxillary antrostomy. Endoscopic medial maxillectomy (EMM) is an increasingly utilized surgical intervention for recalcitrant maxillary sinusitis. Using structured histopathology and culture data, our study demonstrates increased fibrosis and positive cultures for Pseudomonas aeruginona and coagulase‐negative Staphylococcus species in patients who required EMM for recalcitrant maxillary sinusitis, which could suggest tissue architectural changes and bacterial infection as factors contributing to persistent sinus disease. Objectives Endoscopic medial maxillectomy (EMM) is an effective intervention for patients with recalcitrant maxillary sinusitis after previous middle meatal antrostomy. The pathophysiology of refractory maxillary sinusitis is incompletely understood. We aim to identify trends in structured histopathology (SHP) to better understand how tissue architecture changes contribute to refractory sinusitis and impaired mucociliary clearance. Methods All patients who underwent EMM or standard maxillary antrostomy for recalcitrant maxillary sinusitis of various forms were included. Retrospective chart review was conducted to collect information on demographics, disease characteristics, comorbid conditions, culture data, and SHP reports. Chi‐squared and logistic regression analyses were performed for SHP variables. Results Forty‐one patients who underwent EMM and 464 patients who underwent maxillary antrostomy were included. On average, the EMM cohort was 10 years older (60.9 years vs. 51.1 years; p = 0.001) and more often had a history of prior sinus procedures (73.2% vs. 40.9%; p
medicine, research & experimental,otorhinolaryngology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?