How Bottom-Line Mentality Leads to Abusive Supervision? Investigating the Mediating Effects of Anxiety
Xuan Zheng,Ling Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s436568
IF: 3.974
2023-11-02
Psychology Research and Behavior Management
Abstract:Xuan Zheng, Ling Zhang Department of Human Resources Management, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Ling Zhang, Department of Human Resource Management, College of Business, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, 100 Wudong Road, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China, Email Purpose: By integrating the theory of workplace anxiety with a self-regulatory theory, this study investigates the mediating role of workplace anxiety in the relationship between leader bottom-line mentality and abusive supervision targeting the follower, as well as the moderating effect of rules climate on leaders' emotion-behavior process. Methods: A total of 393 employees and 91 supervising managers participated in the multi-source, two-wave survey. To test our hypotheses, we performed the regression analysis and conducted bootstrapping analyses using the Hayes PROCESS Model. Results: Findings indicated that leader bottom-line mentality has a positive indirect relationship with abusive supervision via workplace anxiety. In addition, rules climate weakens abusive supervision for workplace anxiety, revealing a significant moderate effect. Conclusion: Leaders with high BLM encapsulate apprehension and tension, which are deficient in fostering workplace anxiety as an important affect process that facilitates abusive supervision. During this process, we identify rules climate as an important boundary condition for our model and theorization. Keywords: bottom-line mentality, workplace anxiety, abusive supervision, rules climate, self-regulation Bottom-line mentality (BLM) defines as "one-dimensional thinking that revolves around securing bottom-line outcomes to the neglect of competing priorities". 1,2 Bottom-line outcomes are typically financial in nature, and the competing priorities can include things such as moral and social norms, employee welfare, work quality, or justice concerns. 1–3 Despite it is ubiquitous in the workplace, prior research has predominantly linked it to undesirable or dysfunctional outcomes such as withdrawal from helping others, 4,5 decrease in personal performance, 6 and engagement in social undermining 1 or unethical pro-leader behavior. 7–9 Although the burgeoning research on BLM has helped to establish a solid foundation, 10–12 more work is needed to advance the BLM literature in specific ways. Nearly all of the empirical studies of BLM have focused on interpersonal process of BLM on other individuals, such as coworkers or subordinates. 1,7,13 However, applications of these evidences seldom depict how leaders' reaction to this belief translates into their leader behaviors. Furthermore, leader behaviors reflect their attributes and attitudes, 14 exploring whether and how leader BLM influences one's affect and behavior, which is vitally important to organizational function. 15 Leaders use different patterns of behavior to achieve their goals when influencing others. Enterprise leader behaviors are the characteristics of a habituated leadership style, which is gradually formed in long-term personal experience and work environment, and consciously or unconsciously plays a stable role in leadership practice, with a strong personalized color. The theoretical value and practical significance of BLM research lies in that it can better predict the actual leader behaviors and explain how and why the form of this leader behavior. Accordingly, our goal in this study is to provide a more balanced, or functional, view of the leader BLM concept. To do so, we draw on the theory of workplace anxiety (TWA) 16 to first adopt workplace anxiety to explain the indirect relationships between leader BLM and corresponding leader behaviors at work in the forms of abusive supervision, which is defined as "subordinates' perceptions of the extent to which supervisors engage in the sustained display of hostile verbal and nonverbal behaviors, excluding physical contact". 17 Specifically, leaders high in BLM tend to develop a narrow and also competitive mindset, prompting them to realize the scarcity of valuable resources. 2,18 While they put their own reputation and personal success as the first priority, other people are viewed as competitors for work accolades. 1,19 To ensure that they will eventually stand out, people high in BLM will pay close attention to monitoring their own performance and cues about those of others, 20,21 which not only leads to a strong sense of workplace anxiety 16 but also jeopardizes their ability to control their emotions and behaviors, 22 nudging them to be rude and even abusive a -Abstract Truncated-
psychology, clinical, multidisciplinary