Abstract:This study sheds light on the literature on knowledge-hiding behavior in organizations and highlights a better and deeper understanding of the reasons for giving rise to knowledge hiding. In recent decades, knowledge hiding has been subjected to numerous studies in systematic literature reviews and organizational management regarding its impact on outcomes such as individual and organizational performance; however, the mechanism by which knowledge hiding is influenced by antecedents and the process of leading knowledge hiding has not been actively verified. In addition, most previous studies have classified knowledge hiding into one-factor or three-factor dimensions: evasive hiding, playing dumb, and rationalized hiding. To address these issues and limitations, we aimed to conduct empirical research, which have focused on four new dimensions (playing dumb, evasive hiding, rationalized hiding, and procrastination) of knowledge-hiding behavior. Unlike previous research, we provide a research framework for the process of hiding knowledge and verify the significance of the research model, drawing on the social exchange theory and conservation of resources theory to explore and verify the process of hiding knowledge. Specifically, we argue that knowledge hiding is caused by exploitative leadership, and psychological distress as mediators in the relationship between these two variables. Moreover, the moderating and mediating effects of leader incivility were verified. To empirically test the research model, a survey was conducted with 287 employees from small- and medium-sized enterprises in China. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), SPSS PROCESS, and AMOS software were used for statistical analyzes. The findings provide evidence that exploitative leadership positively influences both psychological distress and the four dimensions of knowledge hiding. In addition, the mediating effect of psychological distress and the moderating effect of leader incivility were verified and shown to be statistically significant. Based on these findings, the theoretical and practical implications, limitations, and directions for future research are discussed. Overall, the most important contribution is expanding the research field, as this is the first empirical study on the four dimensions of knowledge hiding.

To share or not to share? A moderated mediation model of the relationship between perceived overqualification and knowledge sharing

The Mediation Of In-Group Identification Between Collectivism And Knowledge Sharing

Employee Commitment, Knowledge Sharing And Knowledge Integration: An Empirical Study Of Professional Staffs In Chinese Firms

An Empirical Study on the Relationship Between Knowledge Sharing and Affective Commitment of Professional Staff

Employees’ Trust and Their Knowledge Sharing and Integration: the Mediating Roles of Organizational Identification and Organization-Based Self-Esteem

An Empirical Study on Knowledge Sharing, Affective Commitment, Perceived Task Interdependence and Job Involvement in Chinese Accounting Firms

Motivating Knowledge Sharing in Knowledge Management Systems

Overqualification and counterproductive work behaviors: Examining a moderated mediation model

Perceived Overqualification And Its Outcomes: The Moderating Role Of Organizational Learning

The positive side of overqualification: examining perceived overqualification linkage with knowledge sharing and career planning

Perceived overqualification? Examining its nexus with cyberloafing and knowledge hiding behaviour: harmonious passion as a moderator

Unveiling the nexus between perceived overqualification and knowledge hiding: Moderated mediation analysis of job crafting and job boredom

Sharing or hiding? The influence of supervisor bottom-line mentality on employee knowledge behaviors

Perceived Overqualification and Cyberloafing: A Moderated-Mediation Model Based on Equity Theory

Exploring the effect of perceived overqualification on knowledge hiding: The role of psychological capital and person-organization fit

Fostering Knowledge Exchange in Digital Communities: Psychological Determinants of Sharing in Q&A Platforms

Capable Fish or Deficient Ponds? A Meta-Analysis of Consequences, Mechanisms, and Moderators of Perceived Overqualification

A Relational Model of Perceived Overqualification: the Moderating Role of Interpersonal Influence on Social Acceptance

Perceived Overqualification and Intensive Smartphone Use: A Moderated Mediation Model

With whom shall I share my knowledge? A recipient perspective of knowledge sharing.

Expanding the dimensions of knowledge hiding: testing a moderated mediation model and analyzing the mediating role of psychological distress using PLS-SEM