The Need to Get In, Not Out, of Generative Enactments: A Relational Argument for Frequency

Sarah Schoen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1551806X.2019.1653662
2019-11-25
Psychoanalytic Perspectives
Abstract:Atlas and Aron (2017/2019) invite us to think about the utility of enactments– not only as something that the analytic pair must recognize and work their way out of– but as a form of engagement with the patient's prospective potential that can only emerge in a rich dyadic field. But what of the problems generated by the analytic dyad's conscious and/or unconscious avoidance of getting involved enough with one another that those enactments—those "dramatic dialogues" –necessary for transformation can, in fact, develop? Using a clinical illustration, I build on my relational argument for frequency as a necessary (if not sufficient) condition for a psychoanalysis that relies on enactment as the mainstay of therapeutic action. It is frequency that stands a chance of exposing both analyst and patient to enough data that they find their way into , not only out of , those enactments that require contact with otherwise disavowed, yet potentially generative, aspects of self.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?