Abstract:Having reviewed certain similarities and differences between the various psychoanalytic models (historical reconstruction/development of the container and of the mind's metabolic and transformational function; the significance to be attributed to dream-type material; reality gradients of narrations; tolerability of truth/lies as polar opposites; and the form in which characters are understood in a psychoanalytic session), the author uses clinical material to demonstrate his conception of a session as a virtual reality in which the central operation is transformation in dreaming (de-construction, de-concretization, and re-dreaming), accompanied in particular by the development of this attitude in both patient and analyst as an antidote to the operations of transformation in hallucinosis that bear witness to the failure of the functions of meaning generation. The theoretical roots of this model are traced in the concept of the field and its developments as a constantly expanding oneiric holographic field; in the developments of Bion's ideas (waking dream thought and its derivatives, and the patient as signaller of the movements of the field); and in the contributions of narratology (narrative transformations and the transformations of characters and screenplays). Stress is also laid on the transition from a psychoanalysis directed predominantly towards contents to a psychoanalysis that emphasizes the development of the instruments for dreaming, feeling, and thinking. An extensive case history and a session reported in its entirety are presented so as to convey a living impression of the ongoing process, in the consulting room, of the unsaturated co-construction of an emotional reality in the throes of continuous transformation. The author also describes the technical implications of this model in terms of forms of interpretation, the countertransference, reveries, and, in particular, how the analyst listens to the patient's communications. The paper ends with an exploration of the concepts of grasping (in the sense of clinging to the known) and casting (in relation to what is as yet undefined but seeking representation and transformation) as a further oscillation of the minds of the analyst and the patient in addition to those familiar from classical psychoanalysis.

A theory of the setting: The transformation of unrepresented experience and play

Playing, Paradox, and Analytic Activity Between Knowing and Being

The play of transference: some reflections on enactment in the psychoanalytic situation

Playing And Becoming Psychoanalysis

The Analyst’s “Use” of Theory or Theories: The Play of Theory

Drama and Narration: The Architecture of Psychoanalytic Play

Psychoanalysis of the psychoanalytic setting 1

Transformations in dreaming and characters in the psychoanalytic field

Frame, setting, process, and movement

Time and The Psychoanalytic Situation

Contextualized Language and Transferential Aspects of Context

Play, Free Association, and Enactment

Playing in Time: A Discussion of Smadar Steinbock's "A Look at Chapter Four of Winnicott's Playing and Reality Through the Prism of its Modalities of Temporality"

Interpretation as Hypothesis

The Holding of the Future in the Mind of the Analyst as an Essential Psychic Need of the Patient: Reply to Steven Cooper and Peter Goldberg

The Role of the Patient-Analyst Match in the Process and Outcome of Psychoanalysis

Finding unconscious phantasy in the session: Recognizing form

The Analyst’s Private Space: Spontaneity, Ritual, Psychotherapeutic Action, and Self-Care

Enactive behaviour settings: situating agency, normativity and transformation

Meaning and change in psychotherapy

The Analyst's Act and the Child's Desire: A Retrospective Case Study