Comparison of spinous process–splitting laminectomy versus posterolateral fusion for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis

Daisuke Kurogochi,Masashi Uehara,Mutsuki Yui,Shota Ikegami,Hiroki Oba,Tetsuhiko Mimura,Takashi Takizawa,Takuma Fukuzawa,Koji Hayashi,Hidemi Kosaku,Terue Hatakenaka,Takayuki Kamanaka,Yoshinori Miyaoka,Hiromichi Misawa,Jun Takahashi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07298-5
IF: 2.721
2022-07-06
European Spine Journal
Abstract:Although several studies have recently shown that spinous process–splitting laminectomy (SPSL) maintains lumbar spinal stability by preserving posterior ligament components and paraspinal muscles as compared with conventional laminectomy, evidence is scarce on the treatment outcomes of SPSL limited to lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. We herein compare the surgical results and global alignment changes for SPSL versus posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF) without instrumentation for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.
clinical neurology,orthopedics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?